Hanke Jasmin S, Dogan Günes, Wert Leonard, Ricklefs Marcel, Heimeshoff Jan, Chatterjee Anamika, Feldmann Christina, Haverich Axel, Schmitto Jan D
Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1728-S1736. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.115.
Pump thrombosis is the most severe and acute complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy and treatment remains challenging. Whilst lysis therapy is often not successful, the exchange of the occluded LVAD is currently the most applied therapeutic treatment for this event. With this study we examine the effects of minimal-invasive LVAD exchange on the rate re-thrombosis and outcomes as well as adverse events in the study group.
Between February 2004 and December 2015 more than 600 LVADs were implanted at our institution. We retrospectively studied a patient cohort of 41 patients who underwent LVAD exchange because of pump thrombosis at a single institution. Outcomes, rates of re-thrombosis and adverse events were analyzed.
Between February 2004 and December 2015, 87 exchanges of LVADs were performed at a single center. In 41 cases pump thrombosis was the reason for LVAD exchange. A total of 28 patient years (10,276 days) were analyzed. Average ICU stay was 15.8±20.4 days and average in-hospital stay 38.1±37.3 days after LVAD exchange. After thirty days the survival rate was 80.5%, 75.6% after 6 months and 70.7% one year after LVAD exchange. Out of the study cohort, three patients have successfully undergone heart transplantation. Twelve patients suffered a stroke postoperatively (29%). Twelve patients needed postoperative dialysis (29%). No technical complications of the VAD were recorded in the study group. Two patients underwent successful LVAD explantation due to myocardial recovery. One year after LVAD exchange, 14 patients underwent re-exchange due to pump thrombosis (34%). Eight patients suffered from a LVAD related infection out of which two patients were treated by pump exchange. A total of 12 patients died during the complete one year follow up of this study (29%). Four patients died in the second, two in the third and one in the fourth year after LVAD exchange. The remaining 17 patients are still ongoing on the device. It is generally feasible to treat pump thrombosis via LVAD exchange. Yet, the exchange procedure is not without risk and the risk of re-thrombosis (34%), stroke (29%), postoperative dialysis (29%) and perioperative complications remains high.
泵血栓形成是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗最严重且急性的并发症,治疗仍具有挑战性。虽然溶栓治疗通常不成功,但目前对于该情况最常用的治疗方法是更换阻塞的LVAD。在本研究中,我们探讨了微创LVAD更换对再血栓形成率、结局以及研究组不良事件的影响。
2004年2月至2015年12月期间,我们机构植入了600多个LVAD。我们回顾性研究了在单一机构因泵血栓形成而接受LVAD更换的41例患者队列。分析了结局、再血栓形成率和不良事件。
2004年2月至2015年12月期间,在单一中心进行了87次LVAD更换。在41例中,泵血栓形成是LVAD更换的原因。共分析了28患者年(10276天)。LVAD更换后,平均重症监护病房停留时间为15.8±20.4天,平均住院时间为38.1±37.3天。30天后生存率为80.5%,6个月后为75.6%,LVAD更换后1年为70.7%。在研究队列中,3例患者成功接受了心脏移植。12例患者术后发生中风(29%)。12例患者术后需要透析(29%)。研究组未记录VAD的技术并发症。2例患者因心肌恢复成功进行了LVAD取出。LVAD更换1年后,14例患者因泵血栓形成接受了再次更换(34%)。8例患者发生LVAD相关感染,其中2例患者通过更换泵进行治疗。在本研究的整个1年随访期间,共有12例患者死亡(29%)。4例患者在LVAD更换后第2年死亡,2例在第3年死亡,1例在第4年死亡。其余17例患者仍在使用该装置。通过LVAD更换治疗泵血栓形成总体上是可行的。然而,更换过程并非没有风险,再血栓形成风险(34%)、中风风险((29%)、术后透析风险(29%)和围手术期并发症仍然很高。