• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Learning in complex, multi-component cognitive systems: Different learning challenges within the same system.在复杂的多组件认知系统中学习:同一系统内的不同学习挑战。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jun;45(6):1093-1106. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000630. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
2
The relationship between response consistency in picture naming and storage impairment in people with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.语义变异型原发性进行性失语患者图片命名反应一致性与存储障碍之间的关系。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Jan;33(1):13-34. doi: 10.1037/neu0000485. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
The way in which foreign words are learned determines their use in isolation and within sentences.外来词的学习方式决定了它们在孤立和句子中的使用方式。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Feb;46(2):364-379. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000721. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.幸存的盲目分解:复杂单词识别时间进程的分布分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.物体命名中的语义语境和视觉特征效应:一项使用动脉自旋标记的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1571-83. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21114.
6
More is not necessarily better: How different aspects of sensorimotor experience affect recognition memory for words.多并不一定好:感觉运动经验的不同方面如何影响单词的识别记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Oct;49(10):1572-1587. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001265. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing.在词汇处理过程中,整合启动迅速且不受控制地发生。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):112-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014677.
8
Activation of semantic information at the sublexical level during handwriting production: Evidence from inhibition effects of Chinese semantic radicals in the picture-word interference paradigm.手写过程中次词汇层面语义信息的激活:来自图片-单词干扰范式中汉语语义部首抑制效应的证据。
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Aug;58(4):294-303. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12377.
9
Semantic and phonological schema influence spoken word learning and overnight consolidation.语义和语音图式影响口语学习及夜间巩固。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jun;71(6):1469-1481. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1329325. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
10
A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.生物医学自然语言处理中词嵌入的比较。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Nov;87:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the mechanisms of written word production: Insights from the written blocked cyclic naming paradigm.探究书面文字生成机制:来自书面阻断循环命名范式的见解。
Read Writ. 2019 Jan;32(1):65-94. doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9742-4. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
2
The paca that roared: Immediate cumulative semantic interference among newly acquired words.哇哇叫的树鼠:新习得词汇即时累加的语义干扰
Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
3
Strategic origins of early semantic facilitation in the blocked-cyclic naming paradigm.在分组循环命名范式中早期语义促进的策略起源。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1659-1668. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000399. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
4
Cognitive control during selection and repair in word production.词汇生成过程中选择与修复阶段的认知控制
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(7):886-903. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1157194. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
The Novel Object and Unusual Name (NOUN) Database: A collection of novel images for use in experimental research.新物体与异常名称(NOUN)数据库:用于实验研究的新图像集合。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1393-1409. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0647-3.
6
Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production.片段重叠是有帮助还是有损害?来自口语和书面语产出中阻断式循环命名的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):500-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0900-x.
7
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
8
The literate brain: the relationship between spelling and reading.有文化素养的大脑:拼写与阅读的关系。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1180-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21507. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
9
The dark side of incremental learning: a model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production.增量学习的阴暗面:言语产生中词汇通达过程中累积语义干扰的模型。
Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):227-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
10
Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory.独特特征在词义计算中具有特殊地位:对语义记忆理论的启示
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):643-58. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.643.

在复杂的多组件认知系统中学习:同一系统内的不同学习挑战。

Learning in complex, multi-component cognitive systems: Different learning challenges within the same system.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jun;45(6):1093-1106. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000630. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000630
PMID:30035563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6344326/
Abstract

Using word learning as an example of a complex system, we investigated how differences in the structure of the subcomponents in which learning occurs can have significant consequences for the challenge of integrating new information within such systems. Learning a new word involves integrating information into the two key stages/subcomponents of processing within the word production system. In the first stage, multiple semantic features are mapped onto a single word. Conversely, in the second stage, a single word is mapped onto multiple segmental features. We tested whether the unitary goal of word learning leads to different local outcomes in these two stages because of their reversed mapping patterns. Neurotypical individuals ( = 17) learned names and semantic features for pictures of unfamiliar objects presented in semantically related, segmentally related and unrelated blocks. Both similarity types interfered with word learning. However, feature learning was differentially affected within the two subcomponents of word production. Semantic similarity facilitated learning semantic features (i.e., features unique to each item), whereas segmental similarity facilitated learning segmental features (i.e., features common to several items in a block). These results are compatible with an incremental learning model in which learning not only strengthens certain associations but also weakens others according to the local goals of each subcomponent. More generally, they demonstrate that the same overall learning goal can lead to opposite learning outcomes in the subcomponents of a complex system. The general principles uncovered may extend beyond word learning to other complex systems with multiple subcomponents. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

以词汇学习为例,我们研究了在复杂系统中,学习发生的子组件结构差异如何对系统整合新信息的挑战产生重大影响。学习一个新单词涉及将信息整合到单词产生系统的两个关键阶段/子组件中。在第一阶段,多个语义特征被映射到一个单词上。相反,在第二阶段,一个单词被映射到多个音段特征上。我们测试了由于映射模式的反转,词汇学习的单一目标是否会导致这两个阶段出现不同的局部结果。神经典型个体(= 17)学习了陌生物体图片的名称和语义特征,这些图片在语义上相关、音段上相关和不相关的块中呈现。这两种相似性类型都干扰了词汇学习。然而,在单词产生的两个子组件中,特征学习受到了不同的影响。语义相似性促进了语义特征(即每个项目独有的特征)的学习,而音段相似性促进了音段特征(即一个块中几个项目共有的特征)的学习。这些结果与增量学习模型一致,该模型认为,学习不仅会根据每个子组件的局部目标加强某些关联,还会削弱其他关联。更一般地说,它们表明,同一总体学习目标可以在复杂系统的子组件中导致相反的学习结果。所揭示的一般原则可能会扩展到具有多个子组件的其他复杂系统。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。