Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Fargo, North Dakota, U.S.A.
Department of Research, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2668-2674. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
To evaluate the effect of preconditioning according to intraoperative workflow on initial tension and elongation behavior for femoral adjustable loop devices (ALDs) and closed loop devices (CLDs) in suspensory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with tibial screw fixation in a biomechanical in vitro study.
Three ACLR groups with tibial screw fixation were biomechanically tested in a full-construct setup using porcine tibias. Groups (n = 8 per group) varied by femoral fixation method and consisted of a CLD (group 3) and ALD fixation with (group 2) and without simulated intraoperative preconditioning (group 1). The change in tension after screw insertion and the displacement to restore the initial loading situation were measured. Grafts underwent dynamic cycling (1,000 cycles at 0.75 Hz) using both a position and a force control mode.
Data are presented as mean [standard deviation]. Placement of an interference screw induced a graft tension loss of 62% (49.4 [0.4] N vs 19.0 [10.0] N, P < .001) by introducing a laxity of 0.53 [0.26] mm. Intraoperative preconditioning led to a higher initial load level (228.3 [19.8] N) compared with unconditioned ALD (156.1 [25.5] N, P < .001) and CLD groups (156.6 [12.8] N, P < .001) with less force decrease over position-controlled cyclic loading. Furthermore, initial (-0.22 [0.16] mm) and dynamic elongation (0.88 [0.23] mm) were reduced compared with the unconditioned ALD (0.65 [0.35] mm, P < .001; and 1.56 [0.19] mm, P < .001) and CLD groups (0.16 [0.26] mm, P < .001; and 1.64 [0.24] mm, P < .001).
ACLR with femoral ALD fixation and intraoperative preconditioning allows for restoration of time-zero screw-imparted slack and leads to significantly reduced cyclic elongation in accordance with native ACL function. Both ALD and CLD control groups behaved similarly, with total elongation less than 3 mm including time-zero slack.
Although the clinical relevance of time-zero graft tension loss is uncertain, the use of an ALD in concert with tibial screw fixation may be favorable to allow for tension optimization.
在使用胫骨螺钉固定的前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)中,通过生物力学体外研究评估术中工作流程下的预处理对股骨可调环装置(ALD)和闭环装置(CLD)的初始张力和伸长行为的影响。
使用猪胫骨在完整构建装置中对 3 组 ACLR 胫骨螺钉固定进行生物力学测试。各组(每组 8 例)根据股骨固定方法不同,包括 CLD(第 3 组)和 ALD 固定,有(第 2 组)和无(第 1 组)模拟术中预处理。测量螺钉插入后张力的变化和恢复初始加载情况的位移。使用位置和力控制模式对移植物进行动态循环(0.75 Hz 时 1000 次循环)。
数据表示为平均值[标准差]。置入干扰螺钉会导致移植物张力损失 62%(49.4 [0.4] N 比 19.0 [10.0] N,P <.001),导致松弛度增加 0.53 [0.26] mm。与未预处理的 ALD (228.3 [19.8] N)和 CLD 组(228.3 [19.8] N)相比,术中预处理可使初始负载水平更高(156.1 [25.5] N,P <.001),在位置控制循环加载过程中力的下降较少。此外,与未预处理的 ALD 组(0.65 [0.35] mm,P <.001;0.88 [0.23] mm,P <.001)和 CLD 组(0.16 [0.26] mm,P <.001;0.88 [0.23] mm,P <.001)相比,初始(-0.22 [0.16] mm)和动态伸长(0.88 [0.23] mm)减少。
在前交叉韧带重建中,股骨 ALD 固定和术中预处理可恢复零时螺钉引起的松弛,并根据前交叉韧带的功能显著减少循环伸长。ALD 和 CLD 对照组的行为相似,总伸长小于 3 毫米,包括零时松弛。
尽管零时移植物张力损失的临床相关性尚不确定,但 ALD 与胫骨螺钉固定联合使用可能有利于张力优化。