Suppr超能文献

优化三线转移性结直肠癌患者使用替氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶和瑞戈非尼的治疗顺序。

Optimizing Treatment Sequence for Late-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib.

机构信息

Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Dec;17(4):274-279. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment sequencing for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been highly debated. The thymidine-based nucleoside trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib have demonstrated clinical benefits in randomized phase III trials compared with placebo. However, limited data are available on the most optimal therapy sequence involving TAS-102 and regorafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the present retrospective, observational, real-life study, clinical data on mCRC patients treated with TAS-102 or an alternative salvage treatment at the Medical University of Vienna and University Hospital Zurich were collected from January 2013 to December 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients whose disease had progressed during fluoropyrimidine-based therapy (FBT) with or without an antibody were included. The disease control rate in patients treated with TAS-102 after FBT-based treatment was 24% compared with 35% in patients treated with regorafenib after FBT-based treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-7.47; P = .449). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients treated with TAS-102 was 2.8 months (quartile, 2.0-4.8 months) and 15.9 months, respectively. When the data were analyzed according to the subgroups of patients with or without an FBT-free period, the TAS-102-treated patients with a previous FBT-free interval had a PFS of 3.1 months and OS of 17.7 months compared with a PFS of 2.2 months and OS of 8.1 months for patients who received TAS-102 immediately after FBT.

CONCLUSION

Our results have confirmed the efficacy of TAS-102 and regorafenib in the real-life setting. The treatment sequence analysis showed a tendency for longer PFS and OS for TAS-102-treated patients after an FBT-free interval. Prospective randomized data are needed to gain more information about the most beneficial therapy sequence in the salvage treatment of mCRC.

摘要

背景

对于难治性转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的治疗顺序一直存在高度争议。基于胸苷的核苷三氟胸苷/替匹嘧啶(TAS-102)和多激酶抑制剂瑞戈非尼在随机 III 期试验中与安慰剂相比显示出临床获益。然而,关于涉及 TAS-102 和瑞戈非尼的最佳治疗顺序的有限数据。

患者和方法

在这项回顾性、观察性、真实世界的研究中,从 2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月,收集了在维也纳医科大学和苏黎世大学医院接受 TAS-102 或替代挽救治疗的 mCRC 患者的临床数据。

结果

共纳入 85 例在氟嘧啶类药物治疗(FBT)基础上进展的患者,其中 41 例接受了抗体治疗,44 例未接受抗体治疗。在 FBT 治疗基础上接受 TAS-102 治疗的患者疾病控制率为 24%,而在 FBT 治疗基础上接受瑞戈非尼治疗的患者疾病控制率为 35%(调整后的优势比,1.75;95%置信区间,0.41-7.47;P=0.449)。接受 TAS-102 治疗的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为 2.8 个月(四分位距,2.0-4.8 个月)和 15.9 个月。当根据有或无 FBT 无进展期的患者亚组进行数据分析时,与 FBT 后立即接受 TAS-102 治疗的患者相比,先前有 FBT 无进展期的 TAS-102 治疗患者的 PFS 为 3.1 个月,OS 为 17.7 个月,而接受 TAS-102 治疗的患者的 PFS 为 2.2 个月,OS 为 8.1 个月。

结论

我们的结果证实了 TAS-102 和瑞戈非尼在真实环境中的疗效。治疗顺序分析显示,在 FBT 无进展期后接受 TAS-102 治疗的患者的 PFS 和 OS 有延长的趋势。需要前瞻性随机数据来获得有关 mCRC 挽救治疗中最有益治疗顺序的更多信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验