Suppr超能文献

二线化疗失败后 ≥ 75 岁转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者采用 2/1 方案应用regorafenib 的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib With 2/1 Schedule for Patients ≥ 75 Years With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) After Failure of 2 Lines of Chemotherapy.

机构信息

Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Dec;17(4):307-312. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the CORRECT (patients with metastatic COloRectal Cancer treated with REgorafenib or plaCebo after failure of standard Therapy) trial, regorafenib was proven to extend survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed after all available therapies. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 54% of patients, and data on the activity and tolerability of regorafenib in elderly patients were scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an alternative schedule, 2-week-on treatment and 1 week-off (2/1 schedule), of regorafenib for elderly patients with mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients ≥ 75 years with mCRC who progressed after oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy received regorafenib on a 2/1 schedule. Potentially frail subjects were identified by G8 screening tool and excluded. The 2-month disease-control rate was the primary endpoint, and the secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate.

RESULTS

Between February 2014 and May 2017, 23 patients with mCRC were recruited at our institution. No partial or complete responses were observed, and the stable disease and disease-control rate were 52.2%. The median PFS was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval, 3.8-6.3 months), and the median OS was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval, 6.9-10.6 months). Adverse events were uncommon, and the most frequent grade 3 toxicity adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (9%) and fatigue (9%). Toxicity-related dose reductions and discontinuations occurred in 5 and 2 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib administered with a modified 2/1 schedule to patients who were aged ≥ 75 years and non-frail with treatment-refractory mCRC seems to be tolerable and achieve encouraging results in terms of PFS and OS.

摘要

背景

在 CORRECT 试验(先前标准治疗失败后接受瑞戈非尼或安慰剂治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者)中,瑞戈非尼被证明可以延长先前所有治疗方案均失败后进展的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的生存期。54%的患者发生 3 级至 4 级毒性,关于瑞戈非尼在老年患者中的活性和耐受性的数据很少。本研究旨在评估 2 周治疗和 1 周停药(2/1 方案)的瑞戈非尼替代方案在 mCRC 老年患者中的疗效和安全性。

患者和方法

先前接受奥沙利铂和伊立替康为基础的化疗后进展的 mCRC 且年龄≥75 岁的患者接受瑞戈非尼 2/1 方案治疗。使用 G8 筛查工具识别可能体弱的患者并排除。2 个月疾病控制率是主要终点,次要终点包括安全性、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率。

结果

2014 年 2 月至 2017 年 5 月,在我院共招募了 23 名 mCRC 患者。未观察到部分或完全缓解,稳定疾病和疾病控制率为 52.2%。中位 PFS 为 4.8 个月(95%置信区间,3.8-6.3 个月),中位 OS 为 8.9 个月(95%置信区间,6.9-10.6 个月)。不良事件少见,最常见的 3 级毒性不良事件为手足皮肤反应(9%)和乏力(9%)。分别有 5 例和 2 例患者因毒性相关而减少剂量和停药。

结论

对治疗难治性 mCRC 且年龄≥75 岁且非体弱的患者采用改良的 2/1 方案给予瑞戈非尼似乎是可耐受的,并在 PFS 和 OS 方面取得了令人鼓舞的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验