• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国社区临床实践中瑞戈非尼与曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶±贝伐单抗序贯治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌

Sequential Treatment with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil ± Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Community Clinical Practice in the USA.

作者信息

Ahn Daniel H, Bekaii-Saab Tanios S, Yuan Chengbo, Kurtinecz Milena, Pan Xiaoyun, Vassilev Zdravko, Pisa Federica, Ostojic Helene

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

Real World Evidence Oncology, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;17(6):969. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060969.

DOI:10.3390/cancers17060969
PMID:40149304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939964/
Abstract

: Regorafenib (R) and Trifluridine/Tipiracil ± bevacizumab (T) are approved for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but their optimal sequence is unclear. This study describes the characteristics/clinical outcomes of patients with mCRC in U.S. clinical practice treated sequentially with R-T or T-R. : A retrospective cohort study of 818 patients treated with R-T or T-R between January 2015 and November 2022 was conducted using an electronic health record-derived database. The primary objective was to describe the demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker status of patients treated with R-T or T-R, stratified by treatment line/age. Secondary objectives were to evaluate/estimate the frequency of neutropenia and myelosuppression-related treatments, the number/type of subsequent therapies, time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and overall survival (OS). : Baseline characteristics were similar among patients who received R-T (n = 393) or T-R (n = 425). Lower rates of moderate/severe neutropenia (26%/12% vs. 32%/16%) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/erythropoietin use (22% vs. 24%) were observed with R-T versus T-R. The median TTD was 8.7 months and 8.5 months with R-T versus 8.1 months and 7.9 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. The median OS was 13.1 months and 11.6 months with R-T versus 11.5 months and 10.3 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. : This study did not show a statistically significant difference in OS with R-T versus T-R. Although limited by its retrospective nature, the study suggested R-T may be preferable to T-R given the observed reduction in neutropenia/myelosuppression-related treatments.

摘要

瑞戈非尼(R)和曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶±贝伐单抗(T)被批准用于治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌(mCRC),但其最佳用药顺序尚不清楚。本研究描述了美国临床实践中序贯接受R-T或T-R治疗的mCRC患者的特征/临床结局。:使用电子健康记录衍生数据库对2015年1月至2022年11月期间接受R-T或T-R治疗的818例患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要目的是描述接受R-T或T-R治疗的患者的人口统计学/临床特征和生物标志物状态,并按治疗线/年龄分层。次要目的是评估/估计中性粒细胞减少症和骨髓抑制相关治疗的频率、后续治疗的数量/类型、治疗中断时间(TTD)和总生存期(OS)。:接受R-T(n = 393)或T-R(n = 425)治疗的患者基线特征相似。与T-R相比,R-T治疗的中度/重度中性粒细胞减少症发生率(26%/12%对32%/16%)和粒细胞集落刺激因子/促红细胞生成素使用比例(22%对24%)较低。作为三线和四线治疗,R-T的中位TTD分别为8.7个月和8.5个月,而T-R分别为8.1个月和7.9个月。作为三线和四线治疗,R-T的中位OS分别为13.1个月和11.6个月,而T-R分别为11.5个月和10.3个月。:本研究未显示R-T与T-R在OS方面有统计学显著差异。尽管该研究受其回顾性性质的限制,但鉴于观察到的中性粒细胞减少症/骨髓抑制相关治疗的减少,该研究表明R-T可能比T-R更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/04d5a649ec1e/cancers-17-00969-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/115eeb35670a/cancers-17-00969-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/7d1a223cc6bd/cancers-17-00969-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/5d82f5460de2/cancers-17-00969-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/bd26931ebf3c/cancers-17-00969-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/4d813a9af7df/cancers-17-00969-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/04d5a649ec1e/cancers-17-00969-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/115eeb35670a/cancers-17-00969-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/7d1a223cc6bd/cancers-17-00969-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/5d82f5460de2/cancers-17-00969-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/bd26931ebf3c/cancers-17-00969-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/4d813a9af7df/cancers-17-00969-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4a/11939964/04d5a649ec1e/cancers-17-00969-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Sequential Treatment with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil ± Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Community Clinical Practice in the USA.美国社区临床实践中瑞戈非尼与曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶±贝伐单抗序贯治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;17(6):969. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060969.
2
Survival Outcomes with Regorafenib and/or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Sequencing to Rechallenge with Third-Line Regimens in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-World Subgroup Comparison from the ReTrITA Study.瑞戈非尼和/或曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶序贯用于转移性结直肠癌三线方案再挑战的生存结局:来自ReTrITA研究的多中心回顾性真实世界亚组比较
Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 4;31(12):7793-7808. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31120574.
3
Association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib.接受曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶或瑞戈非尼治疗的化疗难治性转移性结直肠癌患者的左右侧性与生存率之间的关联
Oncologist. 2024 Dec 6;29(12):e1669-e1679. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae235.
4
Retrospective Correlation between First Drug Treatment Duration and Survival Outcomes in Sequential Treatment with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Subgroup Analysis.瑞戈非尼与曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶序贯治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌中首次药物治疗持续时间与生存结果的回顾性相关性:一项真实世界亚组分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;15(24):5758. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245758.
5
Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study.三线及以上治疗转移性结直肠癌时regorafenib 联合替氟尿苷/盐酸拓扑替康的治疗环境和结局:一项真实世界的多中心回顾性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jun 4;30(6):5456-5469. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30060413.
6
Real-World Activity and Safety of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.真实世界中使用曲氟尿苷替匹嘧啶联合贝伐珠单抗治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性。
Target Oncol. 2022 Nov;17(6):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s11523-022-00916-8. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
7
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶联合贝伐单抗对比曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶单药治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Apr 30;15(2):612-629. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-98. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
8
Propensity Score Analysis of Regorafenib Versus Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapy (REGOTAS): A Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study.regorafenib 对比氟尿嘧啶替加氟/盐酸伊立替康在标准化疗失败的转移性结直肠癌患者中的倾向性评分分析(REGOTAS):日本结直肠癌学会多中心观察性研究。
Oncologist. 2018 Jan;23(1):7-15. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0275. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Oncology Center.替氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶与瑞戈非尼治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的回顾性研究:一家三级肿瘤中心的报告
Oncologist. 2021 Dec;26(12):e2161-e2169. doi: 10.1002/onco.13942. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
10
A Real-World Comparison of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.美国瑞戈非尼与曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌的真实世界比较
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Feb 22;21(3):257-264. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7082.

引用本文的文献

1
Redefining the Use of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil Without Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings from the ReTrITA Study.重新定义瑞戈非尼和曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶在不使用贝伐单抗治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌中的应用:ReTrITA研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;17(12):2037. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122037.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study.三线及以上治疗转移性结直肠癌时regorafenib 联合替氟尿苷/盐酸拓扑替康的治疗环境和结局:一项真实世界的多中心回顾性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jun 4;30(6):5456-5469. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30060413.
2
A Real-World Comparison of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.美国瑞戈非尼与曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌的真实世界比较
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Feb 22;21(3):257-264. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7082.
3
Survival improvement for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer over twenty years.
二十年来转移性结直肠癌患者的生存改善情况。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Feb 13;7(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41698-023-00353-4.
4
Phase II dose titration study of regorafenib in progressive unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.regorafenib 治疗进展期不可切除转移性结直肠癌的 II 期剂量滴定研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24057-0.
5
Survival and Toxicities of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib before TAS-102 or Vice Versa: A Mono-Institutional Real-Practice Study.瑞戈非尼在TAS-102之前治疗或反之治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的生存情况和毒性:一项单机构实际应用研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 11;12(2):596. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020596.
6
A randomised phase 2 study comparing different dose approaches of induction treatment of regorafenib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients (REARRANGE trial).一项比较regorafenib 在先前治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者中不同剂量诱导治疗方法的随机 2 期研究(REARRANGE 试验)。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Dec;177:154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.037. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
7
Influence of precedent drug on the subsequent therapy in the sequence of trifluridine/tipiracil with/out bevacizumab and regorafenib for unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer.三氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶联合/不联合贝伐珠单抗序贯regorafenib 治疗不可切除或复发性结直肠癌中前期药物对后续治疗的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 2;17(6):e0269115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269115. eCollection 2022.
8
Sequential Treatment With Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Regorafenib in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: An AGEO Prospective "Real-World Study".曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶与瑞戈非尼序贯治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌患者:一项AGEO前瞻性“真实世界研究”。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022 Jun;21(2):132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
9
Precision medicine for metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice.临床实践中转移性结直肠癌的精准医学
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jan 19;14:17588359211072703. doi: 10.1177/17588359211072703. eCollection 2022.
10
Retrospective Study of Regorafenib Versus TAS-102 Efficacy and Safety in Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients: A Multi-institution Real Life Clinical Data.瑞戈非尼与TAS-102治疗化疗难治性转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者疗效及安全性的回顾性研究:一项多机构真实世界临床数据研究
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021 Sep;20(3):227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 10.