Ahn Daniel H, Bekaii-Saab Tanios S, Yuan Chengbo, Kurtinecz Milena, Pan Xiaoyun, Vassilev Zdravko, Pisa Federica, Ostojic Helene
Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Real World Evidence Oncology, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ 07981, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;17(6):969. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060969.
: Regorafenib (R) and Trifluridine/Tipiracil ± bevacizumab (T) are approved for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but their optimal sequence is unclear. This study describes the characteristics/clinical outcomes of patients with mCRC in U.S. clinical practice treated sequentially with R-T or T-R. : A retrospective cohort study of 818 patients treated with R-T or T-R between January 2015 and November 2022 was conducted using an electronic health record-derived database. The primary objective was to describe the demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker status of patients treated with R-T or T-R, stratified by treatment line/age. Secondary objectives were to evaluate/estimate the frequency of neutropenia and myelosuppression-related treatments, the number/type of subsequent therapies, time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and overall survival (OS). : Baseline characteristics were similar among patients who received R-T (n = 393) or T-R (n = 425). Lower rates of moderate/severe neutropenia (26%/12% vs. 32%/16%) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/erythropoietin use (22% vs. 24%) were observed with R-T versus T-R. The median TTD was 8.7 months and 8.5 months with R-T versus 8.1 months and 7.9 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. The median OS was 13.1 months and 11.6 months with R-T versus 11.5 months and 10.3 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. : This study did not show a statistically significant difference in OS with R-T versus T-R. Although limited by its retrospective nature, the study suggested R-T may be preferable to T-R given the observed reduction in neutropenia/myelosuppression-related treatments.
瑞戈非尼(R)和曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶±贝伐单抗(T)被批准用于治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌(mCRC),但其最佳用药顺序尚不清楚。本研究描述了美国临床实践中序贯接受R-T或T-R治疗的mCRC患者的特征/临床结局。:使用电子健康记录衍生数据库对2015年1月至2022年11月期间接受R-T或T-R治疗的818例患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要目的是描述接受R-T或T-R治疗的患者的人口统计学/临床特征和生物标志物状态,并按治疗线/年龄分层。次要目的是评估/估计中性粒细胞减少症和骨髓抑制相关治疗的频率、后续治疗的数量/类型、治疗中断时间(TTD)和总生存期(OS)。:接受R-T(n = 393)或T-R(n = 425)治疗的患者基线特征相似。与T-R相比,R-T治疗的中度/重度中性粒细胞减少症发生率(26%/12%对32%/16%)和粒细胞集落刺激因子/促红细胞生成素使用比例(22%对24%)较低。作为三线和四线治疗,R-T的中位TTD分别为8.7个月和8.5个月,而T-R分别为8.1个月和7.9个月。作为三线和四线治疗,R-T的中位OS分别为13.1个月和11.6个月,而T-R分别为11.5个月和10.3个月。:本研究未显示R-T与T-R在OS方面有统计学显著差异。尽管该研究受其回顾性性质的限制,但鉴于观察到的中性粒细胞减少症/骨髓抑制相关治疗的减少,该研究表明R-T可能比T-R更可取。