Signorelli Carlo, Chilelli Mario Giovanni, Giannarelli Diana, Basso Michele, Calegari Maria Alessandra, Anghelone Annunziato, Lucchetti Jessica, Minelli Alessandro, Angotti Lorenzo, Zurlo Ina Valeria, Schirripa Marta, Morelli Cristina, Dell'Aquila Emanuela, Cosimati Antonella, Gemma Donatello, Ribelli Marta, Emiliani Alessandra, Corsi Domenico Cristiano, Arrivi Giulia, Mazzuca Federica, Zoratto Federica, Morandi Maria Grazia, Santamaria Fiorenza, Saltarelli Rosa, Ruggeri Enzo Maria
Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;15(24):5758. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245758.
: Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) rarely receive third-line or further treatment. In this context, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two important novel therapeutic choices with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, with different toxicity profiles. This study is a subgroup analysis of our larger retrospective study, already published, whose objective was to assess the outcomes of patients when R and T were given sequentially. : The study involved thirteen Italian cancer centers on a 10-year retrospective observation (2012-2022). In this subgroup analysis, we focused our attention on the correlation between the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months) and survival outcomes in patients who had received the sequence regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil, or vice versa. : The initial study included 866 patients with mCRC who received sequential T/R, or R/T, or T or R alone. This analysis is focused on evaluating the impact of the duration of the first treatment in the sequence on clinical outcomes (OS, PFS) and includes 146 and 116 patients of the T/R and R/T sequences, respectively. Based on the duration of the first drug treatment, subgroups for the T/R sequence included 27 patients (18.4%) who received T for <3 months, 86 (58.9%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 33 (22.6%) treated for ≥6 months; in the reverse sequence (R as the first drug), subgroups included 18 patients (15.5%) who received their first treatment for <3 months, 62 (53.4%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 35 (31.0%) treated for ≥6 months. In patients who received their first drug treatment for a period of 3 to <6 months, the R/T sequence had a significantly longer median OS (13.7 vs. 10.8 months, = 0.0069) and a longer median PFS (10.8 vs. 8.5 months, = 0.0003) than the T/R group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with first drug treatment durations of <3 months and ≥6 months. : Our analysis seems to suggest that the administration of R for a period of 3 to <6 months before that of T can prolong both OS and PFS, as compared to the opposite sequence.
难治性转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者很少接受三线或更后续的治疗。在此背景下,瑞戈非尼(R)和曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶(T)是两种重要的新型治疗选择,在总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病控制方面有统计学意义的显著提高,且毒性特征不同。本研究是我们已发表的更大规模回顾性研究的亚组分析,其目的是评估序贯给予R和T时患者的结局。
该研究涉及13个意大利癌症中心,进行了为期10年的回顾性观察(2012 - 2022年)。在这个亚组分析中,我们关注首次药物治疗持续时间(<3个月、3至<6个月和≥6个月)与接受瑞戈非尼序贯曲氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶或反之的患者生存结局之间的相关性。
最初的研究包括866例接受序贯T/R、或R/T、或单独T或R的mCRC患者。本分析专注于评估序列中首次治疗持续时间对临床结局(OS、PFS)的影响,分别包括146例T/R序列和116例R/T序列的患者。基于首次药物治疗持续时间,T/R序列的亚组包括27例(18.4%)接受T治疗<3个月的患者、86例(58.9%)接受3至<6个月治疗的患者和33例(22.6%)接受≥6个月治疗的患者;在相反序列(R作为首次药物)中,亚组包括18例(15.5%)接受首次治疗<3个月的患者、62例(53.4%)接受3至<6个月治疗的患者和35例(31.0%)接受≥6个月治疗的患者。在接受首次药物治疗3至<6个月的患者中,R/T序列的中位OS显著长于T/R组(13.7 vs. 10.8个月,P = 0.0069),中位PFS也更长(10.8 vs. 8.5个月,P = 0.0003)。首次药物治疗持续时间<3个月和≥6个月的组间无统计学显著差异。
我们的分析似乎表明,与相反序列相比,在给予T之前给予R 3至<6个月可延长OS和PFS。