Hall Johanna E, Patel Dhruv P, Thomas John W, Richards Catherine A, Rogers Philip E, Pruitt Christopher M
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine.
Children's of Alabama.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Sep;34(9):603-606. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001559.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of certified child life specialists (CCLSs) on the emotional responses of children undergoing laceration repair in the emergency department (ED).
Patients 4 to 12 years of age who required laceration repair by suturing were prospectively enrolled at an urban tertiary pediatric ED. Certified child life specialists are not available at all times in our institution, allowing for a priori categorization of subjects into 2 comparison groups, those with and those without CCLS involvement. Subjects requiring anxiolysis, pharmacologic sedation, narcotics, or physical restraint were excluded. The Children's Emotional Manifestation Scale, a previously validated Likert-like tool, was used to quantify the patients' distress, with a higher score reflecting a more emotional child. Just before placement of the first suture, subjects were scored by trained independent observers. Baseline data included age, sex, race, type of local anesthetic, length and location of laceration, and analgesics administered. The primary endpoint of emotional score was compared with a 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test, with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Two hundred one patients constituted the final study cohort, with 103 (51%) having CCLS involvement. Study groups did not differ in regards to any baseline demographic or clinical characteristics. The median emotional score for patients with child life services was 7 (interquartile range, 6-9) versus 9 (interquartile range, 7.5-12) for those without (P < 0.0005).
Certified child life specialist involvement is associated with less emotional distress for children undergoing laceration repair in the ED.
本研究旨在评估认证儿童生活专家(CCLS)对急诊科(ED)接受裂伤修复的儿童情绪反应的影响。
前瞻性纳入一家城市三级儿科急诊科中4至12岁需要缝合进行裂伤修复的患者。我们机构并非随时都有认证儿童生活专家,这使得可以将受试者预先分为两个比较组,即有CCLS参与和没有CCLS参与的组。排除需要抗焦虑、药物镇静、使用麻醉剂或身体约束的受试者。儿童情绪表现量表是一种先前经过验证的类似李克特量表的工具,用于量化患者的痛苦程度,分数越高表明儿童情绪反应越强烈。在缝合第一针之前,由训练有素的独立观察者对受试者进行评分。基线数据包括年龄、性别、种族、局部麻醉剂类型、裂伤的长度和位置以及使用的镇痛药。情绪评分的主要终点采用双尾曼-惠特尼U检验进行比较,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
201名患者构成了最终研究队列,其中103名(51%)有CCLS参与。研究组在任何基线人口统计学或临床特征方面均无差异。接受儿童生活服务的患者的情绪评分中位数为7(四分位间距,6 - 9),而未接受服务的患者为9(四分位间距,7.5 - 12)(P<0.0005)。
在急诊科接受裂伤修复的儿童中,认证儿童生活专家的参与与较少的情绪困扰相关。