Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(7):1316-1344. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000648. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
Numerous studies have provided evidence that readers generate phonological codes while reading. However, a central question in much of this research has been how early these codes are generated. Answering this question has implications for the roles that phonological coding might play for skilled readers, especially whether phonological codes affect the identification of most words, which can only be the case if these codes are generated rapidly. To investigate the time course of phonological coding during silent reading, the present series of experiments examined survival analyses of first-fixation durations on phonologically related (homophones, pseudohomophones) and orthographic control (orthographically matched words and nonwords) stimuli that were either embedded in sentences in place of correct targets (Experiments 1 and 2) or presented as parafoveal previews for correct targets using the boundary paradigm (Experiments 3 and 4). Survival analyses revealed a discernible difference between processing the phonologically related versus the orthographic control items by as early as 160 ms from the start of fixation on average (160-173 ms across experiments). Because only approximately 18% of first fixation durations were shorter than these mean estimates and follow-up tests revealed that earlier divergence point estimates were associated with shorter gaze durations (e.g., more rapid word identification), results suggest that skilled readers rapidly generate phonological codes during normal, silent reading and that these codes may affect the identification of most words. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
大量研究提供了证据,表明读者在阅读时会生成语音码。然而,这方面的大部分研究的一个核心问题是这些代码是在何时生成的。回答这个问题对于熟练读者的语音编码可能起到的作用具有重要意义,特别是语音编码是否会影响大多数单词的识别,而这只有在这些编码能够快速生成的情况下才有可能。为了探究默读过程中语音编码的时间进程,本系列实验通过首次注视持续时间的生存分析,考察了在句子中嵌入的语音相关(同音字、伪同音字)和正字法控制(正字法匹配的单词和非单词)刺激物的情况(实验 1 和 2),或者使用边界范式(实验 3 和 4)为正确目标呈现作为旁注的预视刺激物。生存分析显示,在注视开始后的 160 毫秒左右,就可以明显区分处理语音相关与正字法控制项目之间的差异(实验中平均为 160-173 毫秒)。因为只有大约 18%的首次注视持续时间短于这些平均估计值,并且后续测试表明,较早的发散点估计值与较短的注视时间(例如,更快的单词识别)相关,结果表明,熟练读者在正常默读时会快速生成语音码,并且这些码可能会影响大多数单词的识别。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。