• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生存分析揭示了早期语音处理如何影响阅读时的眼球运动。

Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(7):1316-1344. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000648. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000648
PMID:30047769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6348047/
Abstract

Numerous studies have provided evidence that readers generate phonological codes while reading. However, a central question in much of this research has been how early these codes are generated. Answering this question has implications for the roles that phonological coding might play for skilled readers, especially whether phonological codes affect the identification of most words, which can only be the case if these codes are generated rapidly. To investigate the time course of phonological coding during silent reading, the present series of experiments examined survival analyses of first-fixation durations on phonologically related (homophones, pseudohomophones) and orthographic control (orthographically matched words and nonwords) stimuli that were either embedded in sentences in place of correct targets (Experiments 1 and 2) or presented as parafoveal previews for correct targets using the boundary paradigm (Experiments 3 and 4). Survival analyses revealed a discernible difference between processing the phonologically related versus the orthographic control items by as early as 160 ms from the start of fixation on average (160-173 ms across experiments). Because only approximately 18% of first fixation durations were shorter than these mean estimates and follow-up tests revealed that earlier divergence point estimates were associated with shorter gaze durations (e.g., more rapid word identification), results suggest that skilled readers rapidly generate phonological codes during normal, silent reading and that these codes may affect the identification of most words. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

大量研究提供了证据,表明读者在阅读时会生成语音码。然而,这方面的大部分研究的一个核心问题是这些代码是在何时生成的。回答这个问题对于熟练读者的语音编码可能起到的作用具有重要意义,特别是语音编码是否会影响大多数单词的识别,而这只有在这些编码能够快速生成的情况下才有可能。为了探究默读过程中语音编码的时间进程,本系列实验通过首次注视持续时间的生存分析,考察了在句子中嵌入的语音相关(同音字、伪同音字)和正字法控制(正字法匹配的单词和非单词)刺激物的情况(实验 1 和 2),或者使用边界范式(实验 3 和 4)为正确目标呈现作为旁注的预视刺激物。生存分析显示,在注视开始后的 160 毫秒左右,就可以明显区分处理语音相关与正字法控制项目之间的差异(实验中平均为 160-173 毫秒)。因为只有大约 18%的首次注视持续时间短于这些平均估计值,并且后续测试表明,较早的发散点估计值与较短的注视时间(例如,更快的单词识别)相关,结果表明,熟练读者在正常默读时会快速生成语音码,并且这些码可能会影响大多数单词的识别。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/6a518723d00f/nihms972694f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/48d2d6f903e7/nihms972694f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/306deb9cb8c8/nihms972694f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/af4c2cf8bd36/nihms972694f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/e10e7127aa7f/nihms972694f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/ac832932f239/nihms972694f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/1c233f2eb99a/nihms972694f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/6a518723d00f/nihms972694f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/48d2d6f903e7/nihms972694f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/306deb9cb8c8/nihms972694f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/af4c2cf8bd36/nihms972694f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/e10e7127aa7f/nihms972694f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/ac832932f239/nihms972694f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/1c233f2eb99a/nihms972694f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ac/6348047/6a518723d00f/nihms972694f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.生存分析揭示了早期语音处理如何影响阅读时的眼球运动。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(7):1316-1344. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000648. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
2
The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.预视有效性在阅读中眼动的可预测性和频率效应方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):110-127. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000561. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
3
Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.语音代码在单词注视之前就已组装完成:来自句子阅读中边界范式的证据。
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):299-310. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00442-5.
4
Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences.汉字语音编码的使用:来自阅读句子时副中央凹预视加工的证据。
Brain Lang. 2004 Nov;91(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.02.005.
5
Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.视副区对转位字母词和非词的加工:对视副区词汇激活的否定证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):191-212. doi: 10.1037/a0025983. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
6
Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements.默读过程中的元音处理:来自眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):416-24. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.416.
7
Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.探究中文阅读中的词长效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1831-1841. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000589.
8
Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.反向预览效益效应:强制注视强调了副中央凹视觉对高效阅读的重要性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Dec;42(12):2039-2067. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000270. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
9
Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers.正字法和语音预视的益处:熟练和不太熟练的聋人读者的副中央凹加工
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(11):2237-52. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.780085. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.大写字母与句法复杂度相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jun;46(6):1146-1164. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000780. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Parafoveal N400 effects reveal that word skipping is associated with deeper lexical processing in the presence of context-driven expectations.旁中央凹N400效应表明,在存在上下文驱动预期的情况下,跳读单词与更深入的词汇加工相关。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jan;87(1):76-93. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02984-6. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
The role of orthographic and phonological processing during reading Chinese sentences: Evidence from eye movements.阅读中文句子时正字法和语音加工的作用:来自眼动的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1148815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148815. eCollection 2023.
3
Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinct.阅读过程中的中央凹旁视退化仅在其在感知上不明显时才会降低预视成本。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Feb;74(2):254-276. doi: 10.1177/1747021820959661. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.读者是否会在扫视过程中整合语音代码?一项贝叶斯荟萃分析及对未发表文献的调查。
J Cogn. 2019 Oct 4;2(1):43. doi: 10.5334/joc.87.

本文引用的文献

1
On using distributional analysis techniques for determining the onset of the influence of experimental variables.关于使用分布分析技术来确定实验变量影响的起始点。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr 21:1-32. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310262.
2
The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.视觉单词快速识别过程中语义启动的起始与时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):881-902. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000377. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
3
The Word Frequency Effect on Saccade Targeting during Chinese Reading: Evidence from a Survival Analysis of Saccade Length.中文阅读过程中词频对眼跳目标选择的影响:来自眼跳长度生存分析的证据
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 6;8:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00116. eCollection 2017.
4
Skilled adult readers activate the meanings of high-frequency words using phonology: Evidence from eye tracking.熟练的成年读者利用语音激活高频词汇的含义:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):334-346. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0661-4.
5
Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.反向预览效益效应:强制注视强调了副中央凹视觉对高效阅读的重要性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Dec;42(12):2039-2067. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000270. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
6
Phonological activation of word meanings in grade 5 readers.五年级读者对词义的语音激活
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(4):524-41. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000184. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Estimating the divergence point: a novel distributional analysis procedure for determining the onset of the influence of experimental variables.估计分歧点:一种用于确定实验变量影响开始的新分布分析程序。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 8;5:1432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01432. eCollection 2014.
8
Phonological coding during reading.阅读过程中的语音编码。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1534-55. doi: 10.1037/a0037830. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
9
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
10
Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.句子阅读过程中的跳词现象:词汇性对副中央凹加工的影响
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):201-13. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0494-1.