The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, Grays Inn Road, London, UK.
MACVIA-France and Foundation FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France.
Rhinology. 2019 Feb 1;57(1):49-56. doi: 10.4193/Rhin18.076.
The 2nd Rhinology Future Debate, organized by EUFOREA (European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airways diseases) was held in Brussels in December 2017. One of these debates addressed the position of MP-AzeFlu in allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment. The current article summarizes this debate; reviewing recent data, and exploring how this has been interpreted by experts and incorporated into AR management guidelines and a clinical decision support system (CDSS). The Allergic Rhinitis & its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guideline position MP-AzeFlu firstline for the treatment of AR, and in preference to intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) during the first 2 weeks of treatment. The AR CDSS recommends MP-AzeFlu as one of the firstline treatments for patients with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score lower than 5/10 cm, and in preference (along with INS) for those with a VAS score equal or higher than5/10 cm. Panellists agreed that AR management should be kept as simple as possible, with some preferring a one treatment fits all approach, while others preferred a step-up approach. The need to change the AR management mentality was acknowledged, accepting that most patients use their medication as needed and use multiple treatments; AR medications are needed which have a very fast onset of action and which target breakthrough symptoms. Panellists agreed that MP-AzeFlu has a role to play here, since it has a 5 minute onset-of-action, provides clinically-relevant symptom relief in 15 mins and AR control in less than 3 days, targets nasal hyper-reactivity (NHR) which likely contributes to uncontrolled AR and breakthrough symptoms, and provides more effective AR symptom relief than INS monotherapy or INS + oral antihistamine. Finally, experts considered it likely that MP-AzeFlu should have a greater impact on asthma control than INS in co-morbid patients, but clinical data is required to back up existing pharmacoeconomic evidence. The next Rhinology Future Debate will be in held in Brussels in Dec 2019.
第二届鼻科学未来辩论会由 EUFOREA(欧洲过敏和气道疾病研究与教育论坛)组织,于 2017 年 12 月在布鲁塞尔举行。其中一场辩论涉及 MP-AzeFlu 在过敏性鼻炎(AR)治疗中的地位。本文总结了这场辩论;回顾了最新数据,并探讨了专家如何对此进行解读以及将其纳入 AR 管理指南和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)。过敏性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响(ARIA)指南将 MP-AzeFlu 列为 AR 的一线治疗药物,在治疗的前 2 周内优于鼻内皮质类固醇(INS)。AR CDSS 建议将 MP-AzeFlu 作为视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分低于 5/10cm 的患者的一线治疗药物之一,并且对于 VAS 评分等于或高于 5/10cm 的患者,与 INS 联合使用。小组成员一致认为,AR 管理应尽可能简单,一些人更喜欢一种治疗方法适用于所有患者,而另一些人则更喜欢逐步治疗。需要改变 AR 管理理念,承认大多数患者按需使用药物并使用多种治疗方法;需要具有非常快速作用的药物来治疗突破性症状。小组成员一致认为 MP-AzeFlu 可以发挥作用,因为它的起效时间为 5 分钟,在 15 分钟内提供临床相关的症状缓解,在不到 3 天内控制 AR,针对鼻高反应性(NHR),这可能导致 AR 未得到控制和突破性症状,并且比 INS 单一疗法或 INS+口服抗组胺药更有效地缓解 AR 症状。最后,专家认为,在合并患者中,MP-AzeFlu 对哮喘控制的影响可能大于 INS,但需要临床数据来支持现有的药物经济学证据。下一届鼻科学未来辩论将于 2019 年 12 月在布鲁塞尔举行。