Suppr超能文献

人际暴力风险因素:荟萃分析的伞式综述。

Risk factors for interpersonal violence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

机构信息

Professor of Forensic Psychiatry,Department of Psychiatry,University of Oxford,UK.

Registrar in General and Older Adult Psychiatry,Department of Psychiatry,University of Oxford,UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;213(4):609-614. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.145. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interpersonal violence is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The strength and population effect of modifiable risk factors for interpersonal violence, and the quality of the research evidence is not known.AimsWe aimed to examine the strength and population effect of modifiable risk factors for interpersonal violence, and the quality and reproducibility of the research evidence.

METHOD

We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of risk factors for interpersonal violence. A systematic search was conducted to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses in general population samples. Effect sizes were extracted, converted into odds ratios and synthesised, and population attributable risk fractions (PAF) were calculated. Quality analyses were performed, including of small study effects, adjustment for confounders and heterogeneity. Secondary analyses for aggression, intimate partner violence and homicide were conducted, and systematic reviews (without meta-analyses) were summarised.

RESULTS

We identified 22 meta-analyses reporting on risk factors for interpersonal violence. Neuropsychiatric disorders were among the strongest in relative and absolute terms. The neuropsychiatric risk factor that had the largest effect at a population level were substance use disorders, with a PAF of 14.8% (95% CI 9.0-21.6%), and the most important historical factor was witnessing or being a victim of violence in childhood (PAF = 12.2%, 95% CI 6.5-17.4%). There was evidence of small study effects and large heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

National strategies for the prevention of interpersonal violence may need to review policies concerning the identification and treatment of modifiable risk factors.Declarations of interestJ.R.G. is an NIHR Senior Investigator. The views expressed within this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

摘要

背景

人际暴力是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。可改变的人际暴力风险因素的强度和人群效应,以及研究证据的质量尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在检查可改变的人际暴力风险因素的强度和人群效应,以及研究证据的质量和可重复性。

方法

我们对一般人群样本中人际暴力风险因素的系统评价和荟萃分析进行了伞式审查。进行了系统搜索以确定系统评价和荟萃分析。提取了效应大小,转换为优势比并进行了综合,并计算了人群归因风险分数(PAF)。进行了质量分析,包括小研究效应、混杂因素的调整和异质性。进行了攻击性、亲密伴侣暴力和凶杀的二次分析,并对没有荟萃分析的系统评价进行了总结。

结果

我们确定了 22 项针对人际暴力风险因素的荟萃分析。神经精神障碍是相对和绝对意义上最强的。在人群水平上影响最大的神经精神风险因素是物质使用障碍,其 PAF 为 14.8%(95%CI 9.0-21.6%),最重要的历史因素是在童年时期目睹或成为暴力的受害者(PAF=12.2%,95%CI 6.5-17.4%)。有证据表明存在小研究效应和较大的异质性。

结论

预防人际暴力的国家战略可能需要审查关于识别和治疗可改变的风险因素的政策。

利益声明

J.R.G.是英国国家卫生研究院的高级研究员。本文中表达的观点是作者的观点,不一定代表 NHS、NIHR 或英国卫生部和社会保健部的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验