• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻对目击者记忆的影响:一项现场研究。

Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study.

作者信息

Vredeveldt Annelies, Charman Steve D, den Blanken Aukje, Hooydonk Maren

机构信息

Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.

Department of Psychology Florida International University Miami USA.

出版信息

Appl Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jul-Aug;32(4):420-428. doi: 10.1002/acp.3414. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1002/acp.3414
PMID:30069079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6055797/
Abstract

Eyewitnesses to crimes are regularly under the influence of drugs, such as cannabis. Yet there is very little research on how the use of cannabis affects eyewitness memory. In the present study, we assessed the effects of cannabis on eyewitness recall and lineup identification performance in a field setting. One hundred twenty visitors of coffee shops in Amsterdam viewed a videotaped criminal event, were interviewed about the event, and viewed a target-present or target-absent lineup. Witnesses under the influence of cannabis remembered significantly fewer correct details about the witnessed event than did sober witnesses, with no difference in incorrect recall. Cannabis use was not significantly associated with lineup identification performance, but intoxicated witnesses were significantly better at judging whether their lineup identification was accurate. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

犯罪的目击者经常受到毒品的影响,比如大麻。然而,关于使用大麻如何影响目击者记忆的研究却非常少。在本研究中,我们在实地环境中评估了大麻对目击者回忆及列队辨认表现的影响。120名阿姆斯特丹咖啡店的顾客观看了一段犯罪事件的录像,接受了关于该事件的询问,并观看了一个有目标人物或无目标人物的列队。受大麻影响的目击者记住的关于所目睹事件的正确细节明显少于清醒的目击者,错误回忆方面则没有差异。大麻使用与列队辨认表现没有显著关联,但醉酒的目击者在判断自己的列队辨认是否准确方面明显更出色。我们讨论了这些发现的理论和实际意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e1/6055797/35befe3c9e74/ACP-32-420-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e1/6055797/80a4f78ec597/ACP-32-420-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e1/6055797/73b521c6c61b/ACP-32-420-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e1/6055797/35befe3c9e74/ACP-32-420-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e1/6055797/80a4f78ec597/ACP-32-420-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e1/6055797/73b521c6c61b/ACP-32-420-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e1/6055797/35befe3c9e74/ACP-32-420-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study.大麻对目击者记忆的影响:一项现场研究。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jul-Aug;32(4):420-428. doi: 10.1002/acp.3414. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.身份确认后反馈会影响后续目击者的识别表现。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Dec;16(4):387-98. doi: 10.1037/a0021034.
3
Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.预先识别信心与不同编码条件下目击者辨认的准确性有关。
Law Hum Behav. 2021 Dec;45(6):524-541. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000452. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.决策偏差对预测目击证人列队辨认选择的重要性:迈向列队辨认技能测试
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jan 28;4(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0150-3.
5
Sleep and eyewitness memory: Fewer false identifications after sleep when the target is absent from the lineup.睡眠与目击证人记忆:当列队辨认中没有目标人物时,睡眠后错误指认的情况减少。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0182907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182907. eCollection 2017.
6
The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.事前指示对目击证人辨认的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Feb 28;8(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00471-4.
7
Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups.数字侦探:网络侦查降低了警方列队辨认中的目击证人识别准确率。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 15;12:640513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640513. eCollection 2021.
8
Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.目击证据:提高其证据价值。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Nov;7(2):45-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
9
Lineup administrators' expectations: their impact on eyewitness confidence.列队管理员的期望:它们对目击者信心的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Jun;25(3):299-315. doi: 10.1023/a:1010750028643.
10
The role of experimenter familiarity in children's eyewitness identification.实验者熟悉程度在儿童目击证人辨认中的作用。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 26;31(2):147-160. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2175071. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Chilling and Blurring Negative Memories: An Experimental Memory Training Study.消除和模糊负面记忆:一项实验性记忆训练研究。
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jan-Feb;16(1):95-106. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2023.5539.2. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
2
The way we remember and report: an experiment testing cultural differences in eyewitness memory.我们记忆和报告的方式:一项测试目击者记忆文化差异的实验。
Memory. 2025 Jul;33(6):644-653. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2025.2505213. Epub 2025 May 15.
3
Interviewing in virtual environments: Towards understanding the impact of rapport-building behaviours and retrieval context on eyewitness memory.

本文引用的文献

1
Witness memory and alcohol: The effects of state-dependent recall.目击证人记忆与酒精:状态依存性回忆的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Apr;41(2):202-215. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000224. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
2
Witnesses stumbling down memory lane: The effects of alcohol intoxication, retention interval, and repeated interviewing.证人在回忆中蹒跚:酒精中毒、记忆间隔及反复询问的影响
Memory. 2017 Apr;25(4):531-543. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1191652. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications.
虚拟环境下的访谈:理解建立融洽关系行为和检索背景对目击者记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):404-421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01362-7. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Cannabis increases susceptibility to false memory.大麻会增加产生虚假记忆的可能性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4585-4589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920162117. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
False memory formation in cannabis users: a field study.大麻使用者的虚假记忆形成:一项现场研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Dec;236(12):3439-3450. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05309-w. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
盲态顺序列队辨认管理既能减少错误辨认,也能降低对这些错误辨认的信心。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Oct;40(5):477-87. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000197. Epub 2016 May 26.
4
Telling true from false: cannabis users show increased susceptibility to false memories.辨别真假:大麻使用者对错误记忆的易感性增加。
Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;20(6):772-7. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.36. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Cross-sectional and prospective relation of cannabis potency, dosing and smoking behaviour with cannabis dependence: an ecological study.横断面和前瞻性研究大麻效力、剂量和吸烟行为与大麻依赖的关系:一项生态学研究。
Addiction. 2014 Jul;109(7):1101-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12508. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
6
Validation of self-reported cannabis dose and potency: an ecological study.自我报告的大麻剂量和效力的验证:一项生态学研究。
Addiction. 2013 Oct;108(10):1801-8. doi: 10.1111/add.12226. Epub 2013 May 30.
7
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电:为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
8
Intoxicated witnesses and suspects: an archival analysis of their involvement in criminal case processing.醉酒证人与嫌疑人:对其卷入刑事案件处理的档案分析。
Law Hum Behav. 2013 Feb;37(1):54-9. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000010. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
9
Neurophysiological and cognitive effects of smoked marijuana in frequent users.频繁使用者吸食大麻的神经生理和认知效应。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 Sep;96(3):333-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
10
Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification.指示偏差和列队辨认展示会调节管理人员知识对目击者辨认的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Feb;33(1):70-82. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9136-x. Epub 2008 Jul 2.