Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Nov;48(11):1571-1589. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001102. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
Long-term semantic memory (LTM) is known for affecting recall during working memory (WM) tasks. However, the way LTM intervenes in WM remains unknown. Moreover, the available findings are incongruent concerning how attention modulates the impact of LTM on WM. To examine this issue, the involvement of LTM representations in a complex span task was manipulated through variations of the associative relatedness of memory items, while the attentional demand of the concurrent task was varied. Children and young adults were also compared, because children are less efficient in using refreshing for maintenance than adults. Despite the impact of the three main factors on recall performance, which was better for related than unrelated words, with the low rather than the high demanding concurrent task and for adults than children, there was no interaction between associative relatedness and attentional demand, neither in children nor in adults. We replicated these results in a second experiment with a more attention-demanding concurrent task. Moreover, analyses of recall latency showed that adults were faster than children at recalling words and both age groups were faster for related (vs. unrelated) words, but there was no effect of the concurrent attentional demand on recall latency and no interaction. Finally, errors were mostly omissions and transpositions, both more prevalent under high concurrent attentional demand. The present findings suggest that the availability of attention does not modulate the effect of LTM on WM. We discuss how WM models can account for this finding and how LTM can act on WM functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
长时语义记忆(LTM)以影响工作记忆(WM)任务中的回忆而闻名。然而,LTM 如何干预 WM 的方式仍不清楚。此外,关于注意力如何调节 LTM 对 WM 的影响,现有的发现是不一致的。为了研究这个问题,通过记忆项目的联想相关性的变化来操纵 LTM 表示在复杂跨度任务中的参与,同时变化并发任务的注意力需求。还比较了儿童和年轻人,因为儿童在使用刷新来维持方面的效率低于成年人。尽管三个主要因素对回忆表现有影响,相关词的表现优于不相关词,低需求而不是高需求的并发任务以及成人优于儿童,但联想相关性和注意力需求之间没有相互作用,无论是在儿童还是在成人中。我们在第二个实验中用一个更需要注意力的并发任务重复了这些结果。此外,回忆潜伏期的分析表明,成人比儿童更快地回忆单词,两个年龄组对相关词(与不相关词相比)都更快,但并发注意力需求对回忆潜伏期没有影响,也没有相互作用。最后,错误主要是遗漏和错位,在高并发注意力需求下更常见。本研究结果表明,注意力的可用性不会调节 LTM 对 WM 的影响。我们讨论了 WM 模型如何解释这一发现以及 LTM 如何作用于 WM 功能。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。