Suppr超能文献

评估羟基磷灰石/生物活性玻璃和氟磷灰石/生物活性玻璃纳米复合泡沫作为骨组织细胞支架的抗菌性能。

Evaluation of antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass and fluorapatite/bioactive glass nanocomposite foams as a cellular scaffold of bone tissue.

作者信息

Seyedmajidi Seyedali, Rajabnia Ramazan, Seyedmajidi Maryam

机构信息

Dental Materials Research Center, Institute of Health, Babol University of Medical Silences, Babol, Iran.

Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Institute of Health, Babol University of Medical Silences, Babol, Iran.

出版信息

J Lab Physicians. 2018 Jul-Sep;10(3):265-270. doi: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_167_17.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Infection is a serious problem for patients after implantation surgery, which is difficult to treat with antibiotic therapy. The present study was developed to evaluate and compare the antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass (HA/BG) and fluorapatite/bioactive glass (FA/BG) nanocomposite foams as a cellular scaffold for use in bone defects by two macrodilution and disk diffusion methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

, and were cultured in brain heart infusion broth medium with nanocomposite powder for 5 days, and their bioactivity levels were evaluated by daily culturing on solid agar medium plates. To carry out the disk diffusion test, a disc form of nanocomposite foams was used on agar medium with 48 h incubation.

RESULTS

None of two nanocomposites even at their highest concentration (200 mg/mL) did not prevent the growth of two and microorganisms. However, HA/BG nanocomposite on the 3 day at a concentration of 200 mg/mL and on 4 and 5 day at a concentration of 100 mg/mL and FA/BG nanocomposite on the 4 day at a concentration of 100 mg/mL and on the 5 day at a concentration of 50 mg/mL could be able to kill microorganism. In the disc diffusion test, none of the nanocomposites could create a nongrowth zone. Both tested biomaterials showed increased antibacterial properties over time and concentration increase.

CONCLUSION

HA/BG and FA/BG nanocomposites, due to their biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties, are good choices for implantation instead of damaged bone tissue in tissue engineering.

摘要

目的与目标

感染是植入手术后患者面临的严重问题,难以通过抗生素治疗。本研究旨在通过两种宏观稀释法和纸片扩散法评估和比较羟基磷灰石/生物活性玻璃(HA/BG)和氟磷灰石/生物活性玻璃(FA/BG)纳米复合泡沫作为用于骨缺损的细胞支架的抗菌性能。

材料与方法

[具体材料与方法部分未完整给出,无法准确翻译]在含有纳米复合粉末的脑心浸液肉汤培养基中培养5天,并通过每日在固体琼脂培养基平板上培养来评估其生物活性水平。为进行纸片扩散试验,将纳米复合泡沫圆盘形式用于琼脂培养基,孵育48小时。

结果

两种纳米复合材料即使在最高浓度(200mg/mL)下也均未阻止两种[具体微生物名称未完整给出]微生物的生长。然而,HA/BG纳米复合材料在第3天浓度为200mg/mL时以及第4天和第5天浓度为100mg/mL时,以及FA/BG纳米复合材料在第4天浓度为100mg/mL时和第5天浓度为50mg/mL时能够杀死[具体微生物名称未完整给出]微生物。在纸片扩散试验中,没有一种纳米复合材料能形成无生长区。两种测试的生物材料均随着时间和浓度增加显示出增强的抗菌性能。

结论

HA/BG和FA/BG纳米复合材料由于其生物相容性和抗菌性能,是组织工程中替代受损骨组织进行植入的良好选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/101f/6052815/c1c73460987f/JLP-10-265-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验