Wagner Claire M, Antillón Federico, Uwinkindi François, Thuan Tran Van, Luna-Fineman Sandra, Anh Pham Tuan, Huong Tran Thanh, Valverde Patricia, Eagan Arielle, Binh Pham Van, Quang Tien Nguyen, Johnson Sonali, Binagwaho Agnes, Torode Julie
Claire M. Wagner, Arielle Eagan, and Agnes Binagwaho, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Sonali Johnson and Julie Torode, Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, Switzerland; Federico Antillón, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediatrica; and Universidad Francisco Marroquín; Patricia Valverde, Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala; François Uwinkindi and and Arielle Eagan, Rwanda Biomedical Center; Agnes Binagwaho, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda; Tran Van Thuan, Pham Tuan Anh, Tran Thanh Huong, Pham Van Binh, and Nguyen Tien Quang, National Cancer Hospital of Viet Nam; Tran Van Thuan and Tran Thanh Huong, National Institute for Cancer Control; Tran Thanh Huong, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam; Sandra Luna-Fineman, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado, Denver, CO; and Agnes Binagwaho and Arielle Eagan, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Jul;4:1-14. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00082.
Purpose The global burden of cancer is slated to reach 21.4 million new cases in 2030 alone, and the majority of those cases occur in under-resourced settings. Formidable changes to health care delivery systems must occur to meet this demand. Although significant policy advances have been made and documented at the international level, less is known about the efforts to create national systems to combat cancer in such settings. Methods With case reports and data from authors who are clinicians and policymakers in three financially constrained countries in different regions of the world-Guatemala, Rwanda, and Vietnam, we examined cancer care programs to identify principles that lead to robust care delivery platforms as well as challenges faced in each setting. Results The findings demonstrate that successful programs derive from equitably constructed and durable interventions focused on advancement of local clinical capacity and the prioritization of geographic and financial accessibility. In addition, a committed local response to the increasing cancer burden facilitates engagement of partners who become vital catalysts for launching treatment cascades. Also, clinical education in each setting was buttressed by international expertise, which aided both professional development and retention of staff. Conclusion All three countries demonstrate that excellent cancer care can and should be provided to all, including those who are impoverished or marginalized, without acceptance of a double standard. In this article, we call on governments and program leaders to report on successes and challenges in their own settings to allow for informed progression toward the 2025 global policy goals.
目的 仅在2030年,全球癌症负担预计将达到2140万例新发病例,其中大多数病例发生在资源匮乏地区。必须对医疗保健提供系统进行重大变革以满足这一需求。尽管在国际层面已取得并记录了重大政策进展,但对于在这些地区建立国家癌症防治系统的努力却知之甚少。方法 通过来自危地马拉、卢旺达和越南这三个世界不同地区财政受限国家的临床医生和政策制定者撰写的病例报告和数据,我们研究了癌症护理项目,以确定能形成强大护理提供平台的原则以及每种情况下所面临的挑战。结果 研究结果表明,成功的项目源自公平构建且持久的干预措施,这些措施侧重于提升当地临床能力以及优先考虑地理和经济可及性。此外,当地对不断增加的癌症负担做出的坚定回应促进了合作伙伴的参与,这些合作伙伴成为启动治疗链的重要催化剂。而且,每个地区的临床教育都得到了国际专业知识的支持,这有助于专业人员的发展和员工的留用。结论 所有这三个国家都表明,应向所有人,包括贫困或边缘化人群,提供优质癌症护理,而不应采用双重标准。在本文中,我们呼吁各国政府和项目负责人报告其所在地区的成功经验和挑战,以便朝着2025年全球政策目标取得明智进展。