• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and social responsibility: perspectives from the social sciences.跨代表观遗传继承与社会责任:来自社会科学的视角
Environ Epigenet. 2018 Jul 31;4(2):dvy019. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvy019. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
A task that remains before us: Reconsidering inheritance as a biosocial phenomenon.我们面前还有一项任务:重新将继承视为一种生物社会现象。
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Jan;97:189-194. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
Transgenerational impacts of early life adversity: from health determinants, implications to epigenetic consequences.代际传递的早期生活逆境影响:从健康决定因素、影响到表观遗传后果。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Sep;164:105785. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105785. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
4
Present and future challenges for the investigation of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance.探讨跨代表观遗传遗传的当前和未来挑战。
Environ Int. 2023 Feb;172:107776. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107776. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
5
Epigenetic Inheritance: Impact for Biology and Society-recent progress, current questions and future challenges.表观遗传继承:对生物学和社会的影响——近期进展、当前问题与未来挑战
Environ Epigenet. 2022 Nov 5;8(1):dvac021. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvac021. eCollection 2022.
6
Enacting biosocial complexity: Stress, epigenetic biomarkers and the tools of postgenomics.制定生物社会复杂性:压力、表观遗传生物标志物和后基因组学工具。
Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Aug;54(4):598-625. doi: 10.1177/03063127231222613. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Transgenerational epigenetics and environmental justice.跨代表观遗传学与环境正义。
Environ Epigenet. 2017 Aug 3;3(3):dvx011. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvx011. eCollection 2017 Jul.
8
Transgenerational inheritance: how impacts to the epigenetic and genetic information of parents affect offspring health.跨代遗传:父母的表观遗传和遗传信息如何影响后代的健康。
Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Sep 11;25(5):518-540. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz017.
9
Behavioral Epigenetics: Perspectives Based on Experience-Dependent Epigenetic Inheritance.行为表观遗传学:基于经验依赖性表观遗传继承的观点。
Epigenomes. 2019 Aug 23;3(3):18. doi: 10.3390/epigenomes3030018.
10
Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters.为什么表观遗传学不是(一个)生物社会科学,以及为什么这很重要。
Clin Epigenetics. 2022 Nov 11;14(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13148-022-01366-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome Engineering, Chemical Exposure, and the Germline: An Ethical Synthesis.基因组工程、化学物质暴露与生殖系:一种伦理综合论述
Hastings Cent Rep. 2025 Mar;55(2):39-51. doi: 10.1002/hast.4977.
2
Black community member perceptions and ethics recommendations on epigenomic research.黑人社区成员对表观基因组研究的看法及伦理建议。
Clin Epigenetics. 2025 Feb 22;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01840-0.
3
Unaltered hepatic wound healing response in male rats with ancestral liver injury.雄性大鼠肝损伤后肝创面愈合反应未改变。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 10;14(1):6353. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41998-w.
4
Maternal epigenetic responsibility: what can we learn from the pandemic?母体的表观遗传学责任:我们能从大流行中学到什么?
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10094-z. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
Genomics and justice: mitigating the potential harms and inequities that arise from the implementation of genomics in medicine.基因组学与正义:减轻基因组学在医学应用中产生的潜在危害和不公平现象。
Hum Genet. 2022 May;141(5):1099-1107. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02453-w. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
6
Exploring the Ethics of Implementation of Epigenomics Technologies in Cancer Screening: A Focus Group Study.探索表观基因组学技术在癌症筛查中应用的伦理问题:一项焦点小组研究
Epigenet Insights. 2021 Dec 9;14:25168657211063618. doi: 10.1177/25168657211063618. eCollection 2021.
7
"It's Never Too Early": Preconception Care and Postgenomic Models of Life.“永远不嫌早”:孕前保健与后基因组生命模型
Front Sociol. 2020 Apr 21;5:21. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00021. eCollection 2020.
8
Herbert Spencer, Sociological Theory, and the Professions.赫伯特·斯宾塞、社会学理论与专业职业
Front Sociol. 2019 Dec 10;4:77. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00077. eCollection 2019.
9
Communicating science: epigenetics in the spotlight.科学传播:表观遗传学成为焦点。
Environ Epigenet. 2020 Nov 18;6(1):dvaa015. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvaa015. eCollection 2020.
10
Epigenetics Underlying Susceptibility and Resilience Relating to Daily Life Stress, Work Stress, and Socioeconomic Status.与日常生活压力、工作压力和社会经济地位相关的易感性和恢复力背后的表观遗传学
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 20;11:163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00163. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Transgenerational epigenetics and environmental justice.跨代表观遗传学与环境正义。
Environ Epigenet. 2017 Aug 3;3(3):dvx011. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvx011. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
The biosocial genome? Interdisciplinary perspectives on environmental epigenetics, health and society.生物社会基因组?环境表观遗传学、健康与社会的跨学科视角。
EMBO Rep. 2017 Oct;18(10):1677-1682. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744953. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
Responsibility in the age of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) and epigenetics.健康与疾病的发育起源(DOHaD)时代及表观遗传学背景下的责任
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018 Feb;9(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000654. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Race in an epigenetic time: thinking biology in the plural.种族在表观遗传时代:多元思考生物学。
Br J Sociol. 2017 Sep;68(3):389-409. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12248. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
5
Epigenetic inheritance and the responsibility for health in society.表观遗传继承与社会中的健康责任。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jan;5(1):11-12. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30400-4.
6
Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists' Work and Lives.生命科学研究中的不可持续增长、过度竞争与生命价值:博士和博士后科学家工作与生活中评价方式的狭隘化
Minerva. 2016;54:175-200. doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9292-y. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
The ambiguous nature of epigenetic responsibility.表观遗传责任的模糊性质。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Aug;42(8):534-41. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103295. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
8
Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.全球对遗传歧视的恐惧和担忧趋势:系统文献综述。
J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr;61(4):275-82. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Behavioral Microbiomics: A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Microbial Influence on Behavior.行为微生物组学:微生物对行为影响的多维度研究方法。
Front Microbiol. 2015 Nov 27;6:1359. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01359. eCollection 2015.
10
Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist.关注纳米技术?成为一名综合社会科学家。
Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Oct;45(5):642-64. doi: 10.1177/0306312715598666.

跨代表观遗传继承与社会责任:来自社会科学的视角

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and social responsibility: perspectives from the social sciences.

作者信息

Meloni Maurizio, Müller Ruth

机构信息

Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Munich Center for Technology in Society (MCTS), Technical University of Munich, Augustenstraße 46, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Epigenet. 2018 Jul 31;4(2):dvy019. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvy019. eCollection 2018 Apr.

DOI:10.1093/eep/dvy019
PMID:30090643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6070063/
Abstract

Research in environmental epigenetics explores how environmental exposures and life experiences such as food, toxins, stress or trauma can shape trajectories of human health and well-being in complex ways. This perspective resonates with social science expertise on the significant health impacts of unequal living conditions and the profound influence of social life on bodies in general. Environmental epigenetics could thus provide an important opportunity for moving beyond long-standing debates about nature versus nurture between the disciplines and think instead in 'biosocial' terms across the disciplines. Yet, beyond enthusiasm for such novel interdisciplinary opportunities, it is crucial to also reflect on the scientific, social and political challenges that a biosocial model of body, health and illness might entail. In this paper, we contribute historical and social science perspectives on the political opportunities and challenges afforded by a biosocial conception of the body. We will specifically focus on what it means if biosocial plasticity is not only perceived to characterize the life of individuals but also as possibly giving rise to semi-stable traits that can be passed on to future generations. That is, we will consider the historical, social and political valences of the scientific proposition of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. The key question that animates this article is if and how the notion of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance creates new forms of responsibilities both in science and in society. We propose that, ultimately, interdisciplinary conversation and collaboration is essential for responsible approaches to transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in science and society.

摘要

环境表观遗传学的研究探讨了诸如食物、毒素、压力或创伤等环境暴露和生活经历如何以复杂的方式塑造人类健康和幸福的轨迹。这一观点与社会科学专业知识相呼应,即不平等的生活条件对健康有重大影响,以及社会生活总体上对身体有深远影响。因此,环境表观遗传学可能提供一个重要机会,超越学科间关于先天与后天的长期争论,转而以跨学科的“生物社会”视角进行思考。然而,除了对这种新颖的跨学科机会充满热情之外,反思身体、健康和疾病的生物社会模型可能带来的科学、社会和政治挑战也至关重要。在本文中,我们从历史和社会科学的角度探讨了身体的生物社会概念所带来的政治机遇和挑战。我们将特别关注如果生物社会可塑性不仅被认为是个体生命的特征,而且可能产生可遗传给后代的半稳定性状意味着什么。也就是说,我们将考虑跨代表观遗传继承这一科学命题的历史、社会和政治意义。本文所探讨的关键问题是跨代表观遗传继承的概念是否以及如何在科学和社会中创造新的责任形式。我们认为,最终,跨学科的对话与合作对于科学和社会中负责任地对待跨代表观遗传继承至关重要。