Mukhopadhyay Pradip, Ghosh Sujoy, Bhattacharjee Kingshuk, Pandit Kaushik, Mukherjee Partha Sarathi, Chowdhury Subhankar
Department of Endocrinology, IPGMER, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Senior Medical Scientific Liaison, Biocon Limited, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):303-307. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_639_17.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is fairly common in India. International Diabetes Federation (IDF) has defined it as the presence of central obesity with region/ethnicity-specific waist circumference as a mandatory defining criterion along with the presence of two other features from dysglycemia, systolic and/or diastolic hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and low high-density lipoprotein. Although obesity is not prevalent in rural parts of India, especially among the underprivileged population, other individual components of the syndrome are not infrequent among these lean/nonobese persons. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of MetS in rural West Bengal. We also examined that if those persons above the recommended cutoff for waist are excluded, and thus only lean/nonobese persons are included, and the same definition of MetS (herein termed as lean MetS) is applied (three out of four criteria), what will be the prevalence of MetS and will it be lower in the nontribal population compared to the tribal population?
A population-based study was done in the rural area of West Bengal comprising 205 [corrected] peoples from scheduled tribe (ST) population and 200 [corrected] people from the neighborhood community from non-ST population to compare the metabolic health with respect to anthropologic and biochemical parameters.
The prevalence of MetS from rural areas of West Bengal was found to be 21.48% as per IDF criterion, but applying NCEP ATP III criteria, the overall prevalence of MetS rose to 31.1%. The prevalence of normal waist/lean MetS was 12.8%, and there was no significant difference between nontribals versus tribal cohort (14.6% of the nontribes versus 11.6% of the tribal cohort, = 0.436).
A significant number of persons with nonobese/lean MetS exist in the rural area. We suggest that if region-specific waist criteria are not satisfied, the diagnosis should still be sorted by NCEP ATP III criteria.
代谢综合征(MetS)在印度相当常见。国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)将其定义为存在中心性肥胖,并以特定地区/种族的腰围作为强制性定义标准,同时伴有血糖异常、收缩压和/或舒张压高血压、高甘油三酯血症以及低高密度脂蛋白这其他两项特征。尽管肥胖在印度农村地区并不普遍,尤其是在弱势群体中,但该综合征的其他个体组成部分在这些瘦/非肥胖人群中并不罕见。在本研究中,我们评估了西孟加拉邦农村地区代谢综合征的患病率。我们还研究了如果排除那些腰围超过推荐临界值的人,从而仅纳入瘦/非肥胖人群,并应用相同的代谢综合征定义(在此称为瘦型代谢综合征)(四项标准中的三项),代谢综合征的患病率将会是多少以及非部落人群中的患病率是否会低于部落人群?
在西孟加拉邦农村地区进行了一项基于人群的研究,包括205名来自特定部落(ST)人群的人和200名来自非ST人群的邻里社区的人,以比较人类学和生化参数方面的代谢健康状况。
根据IDF标准,西孟加拉邦农村地区代谢综合征的患病率为21.48%,但应用美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗组第三次报告(NCEP ATP III)标准时,代谢综合征的总体患病率升至31.1%。正常腰围/瘦型代谢综合征的患病率为12.8%,非部落人群与部落人群队列之间无显著差异(非部落人群为14.6%,部落人群队列为11.6%,P = 0.436)。
农村地区存在大量非肥胖/瘦型代谢综合征患者。我们建议,如果不满足特定地区的腰围标准,仍应根据NCEP ATP III标准进行诊断。