Brown Tyo Mirinda, McCurry Mary K
About the Authors Mirinda Brown Tyo, MSN, TCRN, is a PhD student, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth College of Nursing, Dartmouth, Massachusetts. Mary K. McCurry, PhD, RNC, ANP, ACNP, is an associate professor and adult gerontology PCNP track coordinator, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth College of Nursing. For more information, contact Mirinda Brown Tyo at
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):11-17. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000375.
This study explored teaching strategies used to promote clinical reasoning in nursing education and identify outcomes used to evaluate effectiveness.
The integrative review framework by Whittemore and Knafl (2005) was used in this study.
Strategies included simulation (n = 10); active learning strategies such as case studies, reflection, journaling, and collaborative learning (n = 13); teaching strategies such as think aloud or case studies with simulation (n = 12); and experiential or clinical experiences (n = 2). Although most studies used exams, worksheets (n = 19), or observations by clinical instructors (n = 2) to measure effectiveness, some studies (n = 8) also used surveys to measure student satisfaction, engagement, or perception; three studies measured the student's ability to use the instrument.
Improving clinical thinking requires development of innovative, effective teaching strategies. Instruments that can accurately evaluate teaching and learning strategies are needed to advance this educational initiative and improve quality of care.
本研究探讨了用于促进护理教育中临床推理的教学策略,并确定了用于评估有效性的结果。
本研究采用了惠特莫尔和克纳夫(2005年)的综合综述框架。
策略包括模拟(n = 10);主动学习策略,如案例研究、反思、日志记录和协作学习(n = 13);教学策略,如大声思考或带有模拟的案例研究(n = 12);以及体验式或临床经验(n = 2)。尽管大多数研究使用考试、工作表(n = 19)或临床教师的观察(n = 2)来衡量有效性,但一些研究(n = 8)也使用调查来衡量学生的满意度、参与度或认知;三项研究测量了学生使用该工具的能力。
提高临床思维需要开发创新、有效的教学策略。需要能够准确评估教学和学习策略的工具来推进这一教育举措并提高护理质量。