• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将牛津参与和活动问卷的日常活动领域作为一个独立量表进行施测:牛津日常活动量表。

Administering the Routine Activities domain of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire as a stand-alone scale: the Oxford Routine Activities Measure.

作者信息

Morley David, Dummett Sarah, Kelly Laura, Jenkinson Crispin

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,

出版信息

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018 Jul 25;9:239-243. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S160263. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/PROM.S160263
PMID:30100772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6065595/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recently validated Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) is a 23-item patient-reported outcome measure, theoretically grounded in the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The measure is specifically designed to assess participation and activity in people experiencing a range of health conditions. Initial validation of the Ox-PAQ identified three domains: Routine Activities (14 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items), and Social Engagement (4 items). The purpose of the analysis reported here was to assess whether the Routine Activities domain of Ox-PAQ could be validated for use as a stand-alone measure without compromising its psychometric integrity.

METHODS

Three hundred and seventy-three patients with a diagnosis of either chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease were administered the Ox-PAQ in an online survey. The 14 items of the Routine Activities domain of the Ox-PAQ were subject to factor analytic techniques and assessed for reliability and validity.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-one patients fully completed the survey, a completion rate of 91.4%. The 14 items loaded onto one single factor with an eigenvalue of 9.29 explaining 66.35% of variance. Reliability was confirmed through corrected item-total correlations ranging from 0.880 to 0.594 and a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.96. Validity was demonstrated through significant differences in scores between the three disease groups assessed.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that the Ox-PAQ Routine Activities domain can be legitimately adopted as a stand-alone measure, the Oxford Routine Activities Measure, where researchers wish to focus primarily on the activity component of the Ox-PAQ. It should, however, be emphasized that where a full assessment of all areas of activity and participation highlighted as important during the development of the Ox-PAQ is required, all three domains of the full measure should be administered.

摘要

背景

最近经过验证的牛津参与和活动问卷(Ox-PAQ)是一项包含23个条目的患者报告结局指标,理论基础为世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》。该指标专门设计用于评估患有一系列健康状况的人群的参与和活动情况。Ox-PAQ的初步验证确定了三个领域:日常活动(14个条目)、情绪幸福感(5个条目)和社会参与(4个条目)。此处报告的分析目的是评估Ox-PAQ的日常活动领域能否在不损害其心理测量完整性的情况下被验证为一项独立指标。

方法

在一项在线调查中,对373名诊断为慢性阻塞性肺疾病、多发性硬化症或帕金森病的患者进行了Ox-PAQ调查。对Ox-PAQ日常活动领域的14个条目进行因子分析技术处理,并评估其信度和效度。

结果

341名患者完全完成了调查,完成率为91.4%。14个条目加载到一个单一因子上,特征值为9.29,解释了66.35%的方差。通过校正的条目-总分相关性(范围为0.880至0.594)和克朗巴赫α值0.96确认了信度。通过评估的三个疾病组之间得分的显著差异证明了效度。

结论

结果表明,当研究人员希望主要关注Ox-PAQ的活动部分时,Ox-PAQ日常活动领域可以合法地作为一项独立指标采用,即牛津日常活动指标。然而,应该强调的是,在需要全面评估Ox-PAQ开发过程中突出的所有活动和参与领域时,应使用完整指标的所有三个领域。

相似文献

1
Administering the Routine Activities domain of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire as a stand-alone scale: the Oxford Routine Activities Measure.将牛津参与和活动问卷的日常活动领域作为一个独立量表进行施测:牛津日常活动量表。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018 Jul 25;9:239-243. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S160263. eCollection 2018.
2
Measuring improvement in health-status with the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ).使用牛津参与和活动问卷(Ox-PAQ)衡量健康状况的改善情况。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 May 17;10:153-156. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S198619. eCollection 2019.
3
The Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ): development of a short form and index measure.牛津参与和活动问卷(Ox-PAQ):简表及指数测量方法的开发
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jul 29;10:227-232. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S210416. eCollection 2019.
4
Validation of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire.牛津参与和活动问卷的验证
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Jun 15;7:73-80. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S96822. eCollection 2016.
5
The Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire: study protocol.《牛津参与与活动问卷:研究方案》
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2013 Dec 11;5:1-6. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S53762. eCollection 2013.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire in Older People.《牛津老年人参与和活动问卷土耳其语版本的信度与效度》
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Dec;24(4):282-289. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0074. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
7
Development of an Exercise-Specific Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire: The PDQ-Exercise.开发一种针对帕金森病的运动特异性问卷:PDQ-Exercise。
Mov Disord. 2021 Sep;36(9):2156-2161. doi: 10.1002/mds.28644. Epub 2021 May 15.
8
A disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life for use in adults with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: its development and validation.一种用于免疫性血小板减少性紫癜成人患者的特定疾病健康相关生活质量测量方法:其开发与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Feb 22;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-11.
9
Predictors of activity and participation across neurodegenerative conditions: a comparison of people with motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.神经退行性疾病中活动和参与的预测因素:运动神经元病、多发性硬化症和帕金森病患者的比较
BMC Neurol. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1024-5.
10
A disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: psychometric testing in an open-label clinical trial.慢性免疫性血小板减少性紫癜成年患者健康相关生活质量的疾病特异性测量:一项开放标签临床试验中的心理测量测试
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):950-962. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Intervention Promoting Physical Activity in People Newly Diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease: Feasibility and Acceptability of the Knowledge, Exercise-Efficacy and Participation (KEEP) Intervention.数字干预促进新诊断帕金森病患者的身体活动:知识、运动效能和参与(KEEP)干预的可行性和可接受性。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(6):1193-1210. doi: 10.3233/JPD-240071.
2
Proposing a Core Outcome Set for Physical Activity and Exercise Interventions in People With Rare Neurological Conditions.为罕见神经系统疾病患者的体育活动和运动干预提出核心结局集。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 21;2:705474. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.705474. eCollection 2021.
3
Use of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.牛津参与和活动问卷在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的应用。
Chron Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;16:1479973119862218. doi: 10.1177/1479973119862218.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire.牛津参与和活动问卷的验证
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Jun 15;7:73-80. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S96822. eCollection 2016.
2
Effects of a Community-Based, Post-Rehabilitation Exercise Program in COPD: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With Embedded Process Evaluation.一项基于社区的慢性阻塞性肺疾病康复后运动计划的效果:一项包含过程评估的随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 May 11;5(2):e63. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5435.
3
Development of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire: constructing an item pool.牛津参与和活动问卷的编制:构建项目池。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 May 21;6:145-55. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S82121. eCollection 2015.
4
Effects of candesartan in acute stroke on activities of daily living and level of care at 6 months.坎地沙坦治疗急性卒中对6个月时日常生活活动能力及护理水平的影响。
J Hypertens. 2015 Jul;33(7):1487-91. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000581.
5
Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估中风患者的扩展康复服务(EXTRAS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 May 5;16:205. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0704-3.
6
An occupational therapy intervention for residents with stroke related disabilities in UK care homes (OTCH): cluster randomised controlled trial.英国养老院中风相关残疾居民的职业治疗干预(OTCH):整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2015 Feb 5;350:h468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h468.
7
Evaluating the psychometric properties of an e-based version of the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire.评估39项帕金森病问卷电子版本的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Jan 23;13:5. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0193-1.
8
How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review.一般健康状况量表(如 EQ-5D 和 SF-36)在精神分裂症中的有效性和反应性如何?系统评价。
Value Health. 2011 Sep-Oct;14(6):907-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
9
Advancing the argument for validity of the Alberta Context Tool with healthcare aides in residential long-term care.推进阿尔伯塔省情境工具在住宅长期护理中医疗助手的有效性论证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jul 18;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-107.
10
Refinement and validation of the Parental Illness Impact Scale.父母疾病影响量表的修订与验证。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010 Mar;16(3):181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 25.