Suppr超能文献

I 级运动员等距大腿中部拉伸最大力量的缩放:我们是否符合假设?

Scaling isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength in division I Athletes: are we meeting the assumptions?

机构信息

Department of Human Movement Sciences, Carroll University , Waukesha, WI, USA.

Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University , Joondalup, Australia.

出版信息

Sports Biomech. 2020 Aug;19(4):532-546. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2018.1498910. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

Abstract

This study examined the validity of various scaling methods, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak force using various scaling methods, and the relationships between IMTP peak force and countermovement jump height.  Fifty-one collegiate baseball and soccer athletes performed two maximal IMTPs.  Absolute peak force was compared between teams and when data were scaled using ratio (RS), traditional allometric (ALLO), and fitted allometric (ALLO) scaling.  ALLO and ALLO validity was violated because different derived exponents existed for baseball ( = 0.20) and soccer ( = 1.20).  Soccer athletes produced greater RS peak force compared to baseball ( = 0.012), while no difference existed with absolute, ALLO or ALLO (all > 0.05) peak force.  Moderate relationships existed between body mass and absolute ( = 0.402, = 0.003) and RS ( = -0.328, = 0.019) peak force, while trivial relationships existed with ALLO and ALLO (both < -0.10, > 0.05).  Trivial relationships existed between countermovement jump height and absolute, RS, ALLO, and ALLO (all < 0.20, > 0.05) peak force.  The current dataset violated allometric scaling assumptions, making it inappropriate to use ALLO and ALLO scaling.  Practitioners must understand the assumptions, limitations, and purpose of scaling methods.

摘要

本研究检验了各种标度方法的有效性,包括使用各种标度方法的等长大腿中部拉(IMTP)峰值力,以及 IMTP 峰值力与反向跳跃高度之间的关系。51 名大学生棒球和足球运动员进行了两次最大 IMTP。对团队和使用比率(RS)、传统等比(ALLO)和拟合等比(ALLO)标度法对数据进行标度时的绝对峰值力进行了比较。ALLO 和 ALLO 有效性受到违反,因为棒球( = 0.20)和足球( = 1.20)存在不同的衍生指数。与棒球相比,足球运动员产生的 RS 峰值力更大( = 0.012),而在绝对、ALLO 或 ALLO 方面不存在差异(所有 > 0.05)峰值力。体重与绝对( = 0.402, = 0.003)和 RS( = -0.328, = 0.019)峰值力之间存在中度关系,而与 ALLO 和 ALLO 之间存在微小关系(两者均 < -0.10, > 0.05)。反向跳跃高度与绝对、RS、ALLO 和 ALLO 峰值力之间存在微小关系(所有 < 0.20, > 0.05)。当前数据集违反了等比缩放假设,因此不适合使用 ALLO 和 ALLO 缩放。从业者必须了解缩放方法的假设、限制和目的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验