Madhiwalla Neha, Ghoshal Rakhi, Mavani Padmaja, Roy Nobhojit
a Co-ordinator, Centre for Studies in Ethics and Rights , Anusandhan Trust , Mumbai , India.
b Senior Programme Officer, Centre for Studies in Ethics and Rights , Anusandhan Trust , Mumbai , India.
Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):36-47. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1502021. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
This paper draws on findings from a qualitative study of two government hospitals in Mumbai, India, which aimed to provide a better understanding of the institutional drivers of disrespect and abuse (D&A) in childbirth. The paper describes the structural context, in which government hospital providers can exercise considerable power over patients, yet may be themselves vulnerable to violence and external influence. Decisions that affect care are made by a bureaucracy, which does not perceive problems with the same intensity as providers who are directly attending to patients. Within this context, while contrasting organisational cultures had evolved at the two hospitals, both were characterised by social/professional inequality and hierarchical functioning, and marginalising women. This context generates invisible pressures on subordinate staff, and creates interpersonal conflicts and ambiguity in the division of roles and responsibilities that manifest in individual actions of D&A. Services are organised around the internal logic of the institution, rather than being centred on women. This results in conditions that violate women's privacy, and disregards their choice and consent. The structural environment of resource constraints, poor management and bureaucratic decision-making leads to precarious situations, endangering women's safety. With the institution's functioning based on hierarchies and authority, rather than adherence to universal standards or established protocols, irrational, harmful practices endorsed by senior staff are institutionalised and reproduced. A deeper focus on organisational culture, embedded in the discourse of D&A, would help to evolve effective strategies to address D&A as systemic problems.
本文借鉴了对印度孟买两家政府医院的定性研究结果,该研究旨在更好地理解分娩过程中不尊重和虐待行为的制度驱动因素。本文描述了这样一种结构背景:在政府医院中,医护人员对患者拥有相当大的权力,但他们自身可能容易遭受暴力和外部影响。影响医疗护理的决策由官僚机构做出,而该机构对问题的感知强度与直接照顾患者的医护人员不同。在此背景下,虽然两家医院形成了不同的组织文化,但两者都具有社会/职业不平等和等级运作的特点,并且将女性边缘化。这种背景给下属员工带来无形的压力,在角色和责任划分上产生人际冲突和模糊性,这些在不尊重和虐待的个体行为中表现出来。服务是围绕机构的内部逻辑组织的,而不是以女性为中心。这导致了侵犯女性隐私、无视她们的选择和同意的情况。资源匮乏、管理不善和官僚决策的结构环境导致了不稳定的局面,危及女性的安全。由于机构的运作基于等级制度和权威,而非遵循普遍标准或既定规程,高级员工认可的不合理、有害做法被制度化并不断重现。更深入地关注嵌入在不尊重和虐待话语中的组织文化,将有助于制定有效的策略,将不尊重和虐待作为系统性问题加以解决。