Kamal Rasha, Hamed Soha, Mansour Sahar, Mounir Yasmine, Abdel Sallam Sahar
1 Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine - Kasr ElAiny Hospital, (women' s imaging unit), Cairo University , Giza , Egypt.
2 Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University , Beni Suef , Egypt.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Oct;91(1090):20170571. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170571. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
Although ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal of all female malignancies, debate still exists concerning the benefits and harms of the screening programs and their impact on long-term survival and mortality from the disease. The most widely tested screening strategies have focused on transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and on algorithms that measure serum levels or interval changes of cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) either individually or in combination. Transvaginal ultrasound can identify size and morphology changes of the ovary that may signal a developing malignancy; yet, it is still accused of having a low specificity. There is preliminary evidence that screening can improve survival, but the impact of screening on mortality from OC is still unclear and warrants further validation. In spite of having many published prospective studies, up to-date, none have been able to demonstrate conclusively a reduction in mortality from OC both in the screened general or high-risk population. Data from the US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial has not shown survival or mortality benefits in the general population. Most prospective trials have reported a decrease in stage at detection (with the exception of the PLCO trial), thereby allowing treatment to be initiated when the disease is most curable. Research is in progress to develop new diagnostic tests and novel biomarkers, which when used in combination can increase the accuracy and outcomes of screening. In this review article, we will discuss the debate provoked on OC screening programs and the impact of using ultrasound on the reduction of OC-related mortality.
尽管卵巢癌是所有女性恶性肿瘤中致死率最高的,但关于筛查项目的利弊及其对该疾病长期生存和死亡率的影响仍存在争议。最广泛测试的筛查策略集中在经阴道超声(TVU)以及测量癌抗原125(CA-125)血清水平或其间隔变化的算法上,这些算法可以单独使用或联合使用。经阴道超声可以识别卵巢大小和形态的变化,这些变化可能预示着恶性肿瘤的发展;然而,它仍然被指责特异性较低。有初步证据表明筛查可以提高生存率,但筛查对卵巢癌死亡率的影响仍不明确,需要进一步验证。尽管有许多已发表的前瞻性研究,但截至目前,尚无一项研究能够确凿地证明在筛查的普通人群或高危人群中卵巢癌死亡率有所降低。美国前列腺、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌(PLCO)筛查试验的数据并未显示普通人群在生存或死亡率方面有获益。大多数前瞻性试验报告称检测时的分期有所降低(PLCO试验除外),从而能够在疾病最可治愈时开始治疗。目前正在进行研究以开发新的诊断测试和新型生物标志物,联合使用时可提高筛查的准确性和效果。在这篇综述文章中,我们将讨论卵巢癌筛查项目引发的争议以及使用超声对降低卵巢癌相关死亡率的影响。