Tsai Yun-Ning, Huang Yi-Chia, Lin Sunny Jui-Shan, Lee Shen-Ming, Cheng Yung-Yen, Chang Yu-Hsin, Su Yi-Chang
Graduate Institute of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Chander Clinic, Taipei 10646, Taiwan.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Jul 5;2018:9018271. doi: 10.1155/2018/9018271. eCollection 2018.
This study aimed to clarify whether it is appropriate to choose any measurement location for pulse diagnosis research.
A total of 37 subjects were recruited and measured for pulse pressure waves at 18 locations (9 per hand of "three positions and nine indicators"). These data were Fourier-transformed to the frequency spectrum, and the harmonics of C0-C10 of each location were obtained. Box plots of the harmonics were generated using SPSS v.22.0 and R v.3.4.1. Data were compared with multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with a randomized block design.
The results showed that certain harmonics were different at different positions and different indicators; the harmonics of the same indicator at different positions (except for C8 and C10) and those of different indicators for the same position (except for C4 and C5) were significantly different (p<0.05).
In future researches of pulse diagnosis, due to the significant differences between positions and indicators, it is recommended that the measurement position should be carefully chosen instead of choosing any measurement location to ensure the integrity of the acquired information for further analyzing physiological or pathological status.
本研究旨在阐明在脉诊研究中选择任意测量部位是否合适。
共招募37名受试者,在“三部九候”的每只手18个部位(每只手9个部位)测量脉压波。对这些数据进行傅里叶变换得到频谱,获取每个部位C0 - C10的谐波。使用SPSS v.22.0和R v.3.4.1生成谐波的箱线图。采用随机区组设计的多变量方差分析(MANOVA)对数据进行比较。
结果表明,不同部位和不同诊法的某些谐波存在差异;同一诊法在不同部位(C8和C10除外)的谐波以及同一部位不同诊法(C4和C5除外)的谐波有显著差异(p<0.05)。
在未来的脉诊研究中,由于部位和诊法之间存在显著差异,建议仔细选择测量部位,而不是任意选择测量部位,以确保所获取信息的完整性,便于进一步分析生理或病理状态。