Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Clinical Trial Planning and Management, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Br J Surg. 2018 Dec;105(13):1793-1798. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10960. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
Treatment of supraclavicular nodes remains controversial among patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This study assessed the outcomes of patients who underwent oesophagectomy with or without supraclavicular lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant treatment.
This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and clinically negative supraclavicular nodes who underwent oesophagectomy after neoadjuvant treatment between January 2005 and December 2015 were included. Overall and relapse-free survival were compared between patients who did or did not undergo supraclavicular nodal dissection. Propensity score matching was used to correct for differences in prognostic factors between the groups.
Some 223 patients underwent supraclavicular lymphadenectomy. The prevalence of pathologically confirmed supraclavicular metastasis was 10·3 per cent, and these patients had poor 5-year relapse-free (7 per cent) and overall (14 per cent) survival. Only two of 55 patients who did not undergo supraclavicular lymphadenectomy had recurrent disease in the supraclavicular region without distant metastasis. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0·95, 95 per cent c.i. 0·61 to 1·47; P = 0·821) or overall survival (HR 0·86, 0·52 to 1·40; P = 0·544). Similarly, no significant difference in relapse-free or overall survival was observed between the propensity score-matched groups.
For patients with clinically negative supraclavicular lymph nodes, prophylactic supraclavicular lymphadenectomy may be omitted when neoadjuvant treatment is administered.
在食管鳞癌患者中,锁骨上淋巴结的治疗仍存在争议。本研究评估了新辅助治疗后接受或不接受锁骨上淋巴结清扫术的食管鳞癌患者的结局。
这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入了 2005 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受新辅助治疗后行食管切除术且临床检查锁骨上淋巴结阴性的食管鳞癌患者。比较了行或不行锁骨上淋巴结清扫术患者的总生存和无复发生存。采用倾向评分匹配校正两组间预后因素的差异。
223 例患者行锁骨上淋巴结清扫术。病理证实锁骨上转移的发生率为 10.3%,这些患者的 5 年无复发生存率(7%)和总生存率(14%)较差。55 例未行锁骨上淋巴结清扫术的患者中仅有 2 例出现锁骨上区域复发而无远处转移。两组间无复发生存率(风险比(HR)0.95,95%置信区间 0.61 至 1.47;P=0.821)或总生存率(HR 0.86,0.52 至 1.40;P=0.544)差异均无统计学意义。同样,倾向评分匹配组间无复发生存或总生存差异亦无统计学意义。
对于临床检查锁骨上淋巴结阴性的患者,当给予新辅助治疗时,可省略预防性锁骨上淋巴结清扫术。