Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Institute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT), Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Surg Today. 2023 Jun;53(6):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s00595-022-02544-1. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
The supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLNs) have been regarded as regional nodes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan and eastern Asian countries, whereas their involvement has been regarded as distant metastasis in Western countries. The importance of thorough dissection of the lymphatic chain along the recurrent laryngeal nerve, including the cervical paraesophageal nodes, has become well understood; therefore, the contemporary clinical question is whether prophylactic SCLN dissection (SLND) in addition to cervical paraesophageal node dissection is beneficial for patients with ESCC. We analyzed studies comparing esophagectomy with SLND vs. esophagectomy without SLND, in both of which cervical paraesophageal node dissection had been completed, based on a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Our meta-analysis focused on two long-term outcomes: 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates; and three short-term outcomes: pneumonia, recurrent nerve palsy, and anastomotic leakage. Four studies, with a collective total of 1584 patients were included in the review. No significant differences were found between esophagectomy with SLND vs. esophagectomy without SLND in the meta-analysis of both long-term (3-year and 5-year OS; risk ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.94-1.26, P = 0.28, and risk ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.96-1.35, P = 0.15, respectively) and short-term outcomes. Based on our analysis, no clear data support prophylactic SLND on the cervical paraesophageal node dissection.
锁骨上淋巴结(SCLN)在日本和东亚国家被认为是食管鳞癌(ESCC)的区域淋巴结,而在西方国家则被认为是远处转移。彻底解剖沿喉返神经的淋巴链,包括颈侧食管旁淋巴结的重要性已得到充分认识;因此,目前的临床问题是,除了颈侧食管旁淋巴结清扫术(SLND)外,预防性 SCLN 清扫术(SLND)是否对 ESCC 患者有益。我们根据对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库的全面文献检索,分析了比较食管切除术加 SLND 与食管切除术不加 SLND 的研究,其中均完成了颈侧食管旁淋巴结清扫术。我们的荟萃分析主要关注两个长期结果:3 年和 5 年总生存率(OS)率;以及三个短期结果:肺炎、喉返神经麻痹和吻合口漏。综述共纳入了 4 项研究,共 1584 例患者。SLND 与食管切除术不加 SLND 的荟萃分析显示,两组在长期(3 年和 5 年 OS;风险比 1.09,95%CI 0.94-1.26,P=0.28 和风险比 1.14,95%CI 0.96-1.35,P=0.15)和短期结果方面均无显著差异。根据我们的分析,没有明确的数据支持在颈侧食管旁淋巴结清扫术的基础上进行预防性 SLND。