Oper Dent. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):200-209. doi: 10.2341/17-356-L. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
The aim of this study was to determine whether using a silane-containing universal adhesive as a silane primer in glass-ceramic/resin cement systems affects biaxial flexural strength (BFS) and bonded interface integrity after loading. Glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar/Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) disc-shaped specimens (6.5±0.1mm in diameter, 0.5±0.1mm thick) were etched with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 seconds and divided into four groups of 30 specimens, to be treated as follows: 1) One bottle silane primer (RCP); 2) Separate application of silane and adhesive (RCP+SB); 3) Silane-containing universal adhesive (SBU); 4) No treatment (C). After silanization, all specimens were resin cement- coated and polymerized for 40 seconds. Each specimen layer was measured, as well as each assembly's thickness, using a digital caliper and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Specimens were stored for 24 hours and submitted to a BFS test (1.27 mm/min). BFS values were calculated using the bilayer disc-specimen solution. Bonded interfaces were analyzed on fractured fragments using SEM. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05) were applied, as well as the Weibull analysis. Factor "silane treatment" was statistically significant ( p<0.0001). RCP+SB (372.2±29.4 MPa) and RCP (364.2±29.5 MPa) produced significantly higher BFS than did the C (320.7±36.3 MPa) or SBU (338.0±27.1 MPa) groups. No differences were found in the Weibull modulus ( m: RCP: 10.1-17.3; RCP+SB: 10.1-17.0; SBU: 12.3-22.4; C: 7.4-12.9). Bonded interface analysis exhibited ceramic-cement separation (SBU, C) and voids within the resin cement layer (all groups). Neither the ceramic/cement system's BFS nor its bonded interface stability were improved by SBU after loading.
本研究旨在确定在玻璃陶瓷/树脂水门汀系统中使用含硅烷的通用粘结剂作为硅烷底漆是否会影响双轴弯曲强度(BFS)和负载后的粘结界面完整性。制备玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD,义获嘉伟瓦登特,列支敦士登)圆盘形试件(直径 6.5±0.1mm,厚度 0.5±0.1mm),用 5%氢氟酸(HF)蚀刻 20 秒,然后将其分为 4 组,每组 30 个试件,分别用如下方法处理:1)一瓶硅烷底漆(RCP);2)硅烷和粘结剂单独应用(RCP+SB);3)含硅烷的通用粘结剂(SBU);4)不处理(C)。硅烷化后,所有试件均涂覆树脂水门汀并用 40 秒聚合。使用数字卡尺和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)测量每个试件层和每个组件的厚度。试件储存 24 小时后,进行 BFS 测试(1.27mm/min)。使用双层圆盘试件溶液计算 BFS 值。用 SEM 分析断裂碎片的粘结界面。应用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05),以及威布尔分析。“硅烷处理”因子具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。RCP+SB(372.2±29.4MPa)和 RCP(364.2±29.5MPa)组的 BFS 明显高于 C(320.7±36.3MPa)或 SBU(338.0±27.1MPa)组。威布尔模数(m:RCP:10.1-17.3;RCP+SB:10.1-17.0;SBU:12.3-22.4;C:7.4-12.9)之间无差异。粘结界面分析显示陶瓷-水泥分离(SBU、C)和树脂水门汀层内有空隙(所有组)。负载后,SBU 并未改善陶瓷/水泥系统的 BFS 或粘结界面稳定性。