Lopes Raquel Marianna, Scaramucci Tais, Aranha Ana Cecilia Corrêa
Department of Restorative Dentistry; School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry; School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil,
Am J Dent. 2018 Aug;31(4):177-183.
To evaluate the effect of desensitizing dentifrices on dentin wear and tubule occlusion using a three-phase, single blind, crossover in situ trial.
The dentifrices containing Arginine and calcium carbonate (1,450 ppmF) and Novamin, (~1,426 ppmF) were tested in two conditions: A: abrasion and B: erosion/abrasion. A dentifrice without desensitizing agents was used as control (1,450 ppmF). In each study phase, 10 volunteers used intra-oral appliances containing dentin specimens (pre-treated with EDTA, to simulate hypersensitive dentin), which were either submitted to erosion with a cola-like drink (pH 2.6), 4×/day (2 minutes), followed by toothbrushing, using electric toothbrushes, with standard pressure (2×/ day, 5 seconds), or toothbrushing only. Dentin surface loss (SL, in µm) was determined with optical profilometry at the 3rd and 5th days of cycling. Dentin surface was analyzed with environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), post EDTA and post cycling, and the dentin tubules were counted using Image J software. Data were statistically analyzed (α= 0.05).
For condition A and B, there were no significant differences in SL among toothpastes in both experimental times. There were also no significant differences between times within groups. For ESEM, in A, Toothpaste with Novamin was the only dentifrice that showed significantly less opened tubules post cycling than post EDTA. In B, Toothpaste with Novamin and control toothpaste presented less opened tubules post cycling. In conclusion, toothbrushing with the tested dentifrices promoted similar levels of dentin loss; however, for tubule occlusion, the toothpaste with Novamin was the only toothpaste effective for both conditions, abrasion and erosion/abrasion.
Ideally, desensitizing dentifrices should promote obliteration of the dentin tubules or nerve desensitization, without further contributing to the progression of dentin wear.
采用三相、单盲、交叉原位试验评估脱敏牙膏对牙本质磨损和小管封闭的影响。
对含有精氨酸和碳酸钙(1450 ppmF)以及Novamin(约1426 ppmF)的牙膏在两种条件下进行测试:A:磨损;B:侵蚀/磨损。使用不含脱敏剂的牙膏作为对照(1450 ppmF)。在每个研究阶段,10名志愿者使用含有牙本质标本(用乙二胺四乙酸预处理以模拟过敏牙本质)的口腔装置,这些标本要么每天4次(每次2分钟)用类似可乐的饮料(pH 2.6)进行侵蚀,然后使用电动牙刷以标准压力(每天2次,每次5秒)刷牙,要么仅刷牙。在循环的第3天和第5天用光学轮廓仪测定牙本质表面损失(SL,单位为微米)。在乙二胺四乙酸处理后和循环后,用环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)分析牙本质表面,并用Image J软件对牙本质小管进行计数。对数据进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。
对于条件A和B,在两个实验时间点,各牙膏之间的SL均无显著差异。组内不同时间点之间也无显著差异。对于ESEM,在条件A下,含Novamin的牙膏是唯一一种在循环后显示开放小管明显少于乙二胺四乙酸处理后的牙膏。在条件B下,含Novamin的牙膏和对照牙膏在循环后开放小管较少。总之,使用测试牙膏刷牙导致的牙本质损失水平相似;然而,对于小管封闭,含Novamin的牙膏是唯一对磨损和侵蚀/磨损这两种情况均有效的牙膏。
理想情况下,脱敏牙膏应促进牙本质小管闭塞或神经脱敏,而不会进一步导致牙本质磨损的进展。