• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的安全性和有效性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。

Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

作者信息

Zhu Ping, Zhou Xin, Zhang Chenliang, Li Huakang, Zhang Zhihui, Song Zhiyuan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5
PMID:30111289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6094581/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of an ultra-thin, Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) compared with durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs).

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of O-SES versus DP-DES. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate risk ratio (RR) by means of a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six RCTs with a total of 6949 patients were selected. All included trials were rated as low risk of bias. The O-SES significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.98; I = 0%; 10 fewer per 1000 [from 1 fewer to 18 fewer]; high quality) compared with the DP-DES. There was no significant difference between O-SES and DP-DES in the prevention of stent thrombosis (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.52-1.08), cardiac death (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.63-1.36), target lesion revascularization (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86-1.42) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78-1.21).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, O-SES resulted in significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction than DP-DES and had a trend toward reduction in stent thrombosis.

摘要

背景

奥西罗生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(O-SES)是新一代生物可降解聚合物药物洗脱支架,其支柱厚度是目前最薄的,旨在改善冠状动脉疾病患者的经皮治疗。我们对随机临床试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,比较超薄的奥西罗生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(O-SES)与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架(DP-DES)的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索Medline、Embase和CENTRAL数据库,查找比较O-SES与DP-DES安全性和疗效的随机对照试验。配对的评审员独立筛选文献、评估纳入研究的偏倚风险并提取数据。我们使用Mantel-Haenszel方法通过随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)。

结果

选择了6项RCT,共6949例患者。所有纳入试验的偏倚风险均被评为低风险。与DP-DES相比,O-SES显著降低了心肌梗死风险(RR 0.78,95%置信区间[CI] 0.62-0.98;I² = 0%;每1000例减少10例[从减少1例到减少18例];高质量)。在预防支架血栓形成(RR:0.75;95% CI:0.52-1.08)、心源性死亡(RR:0.93;95% CI:0.63-1.36)、靶病变血运重建(RR 1.10,95% CI 0.86-1.42)和靶血管血运重建(RR 0.97,95% CI 0.78-1.21)方面,O-SES与DP-DES之间无显著差异。

结论

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,O-SES导致心肌梗死发生率显著低于DP-DES,且有降低支架血栓形成的趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/08bb5f1dec75/12872_2018_902_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/960531582b46/12872_2018_902_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/1bdedc56ff75/12872_2018_902_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/8aa1d7a0ef35/12872_2018_902_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/34fa4c77b0e5/12872_2018_902_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/30c7a7ffbf27/12872_2018_902_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/08bb5f1dec75/12872_2018_902_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/960531582b46/12872_2018_902_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/1bdedc56ff75/12872_2018_902_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/8aa1d7a0ef35/12872_2018_902_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/34fa4c77b0e5/12872_2018_902_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/30c7a7ffbf27/12872_2018_902_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3652/6094581/08bb5f1dec75/12872_2018_902_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的安全性和有效性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5.
2
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.用于经皮冠状动脉血运重建的超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架对比:BIOSCIENCE试验的2年结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003255. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255.
3
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
4
Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建中,生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱超微支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的非选择性应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006741. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006741.
5
Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable or Durable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT.薄、极薄或超薄支架,生物可降解或耐用聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架:BIO-RESORT 的 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1650-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.054. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:随机 BIOFLOW V 试验 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019.
7
A comparison of the ultrathin Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent with contemporary drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超薄Orsiro Hybrid西罗莫司洗脱支架与当代药物洗脱支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jan;19(1 Pt A):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:来自 COMPARE II 试验的最终 5 年报告(管腔生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1215-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中比较超薄可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的亚组分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331.
10
Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中小血管病变患者应用超薄壁支架与薄壁药物洗脱支架的长期疗效:BIOSCIENCE 随机试验的亚组分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e008024. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008024. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in all-comers.在所有患者中比较耐用型与可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架。
Open Heart. 2025 Mar 3;12(1):e003104. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003104.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Two Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice: Genoss DES Stents Versus Orsiro Stents From a Prospective Registry.两种超薄可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在实际临床中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性注册研究中Genoss药物洗脱支架与Orsiro支架的对比
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70060. doi: 10.1002/clc.70060.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Three Different New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in the Randomised BIO-RESORT Trial at 3 Years.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial.冠状动脉血运重建患者中应用超薄可生物吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(BIOFLOW V):一项随机试验
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1843-1852. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32249-3. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
2
Coronary balloon angioplasty, stents, and scaffolds.冠状动脉球囊血管成形术、支架和支架。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):781-792. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31927-X.
3
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent to Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents.
在随机化的BIO-RESORT试验中三种不同新一代药物洗脱支架3年的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jan;9(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00539-x. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
4
Ultrathin-strut versus thin-strut stent healing and outcomes in preclinical and clinical subjects.超细支撑与细支撑支架在临床前和临床研究对象中的愈合情况及结果
EuroIntervention. 2024 May 20;20(10):e669-e680. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00563.
5
Vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal hyperplasia, an update.内膜增生中的血管平滑肌细胞,最新进展
Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1081881. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1081881. eCollection 2022.
6
Clinical Use of Hydrogen Sulfide to Protect Against Intimal Hyperplasia.硫化氢预防内膜增生的临床应用
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 11;9:876639. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.876639. eCollection 2022.
7
The Effects and Mechanisms of the Rapamycin-eluting Stent in Urethral Stricture Prevention in Rabbits.雷帕霉素洗脱支架在预防兔尿道狭窄中的作用及其机制。
Balkan Med J. 2022 Mar 14;39(2):107-114. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2021.2021-4-77.
8
Clinical outcomes of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent in all-comers population: Thailand Orsiro registry.全人群中应用超亲水性雷帕霉素洗脱支架的临床疗效:泰国 Orsiro 注册研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02310-0.
9
Vascular Wall Reactions to Coronary Stents-Clinical Implications for Stent Failure.血管壁对冠状动脉支架的反应——支架失败的临床意义
Life (Basel). 2021 Jan 17;11(1):63. doi: 10.3390/life11010063.
10
Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架:一项荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001394.
随机临床试验的荟萃分析比较可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架与第二代耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 13;10(5):462-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.002.
4
Angiographic outcomes of Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and Resolute Integrity durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents: results of the ORIENT trial.奥西罗生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与雷索卢特整合型耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架的血管造影结果:ORIENT试验结果
EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1623-1631. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00179.
5
Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial.随机多中心试验研究比较在慢性完全闭塞病变中应用可降解聚合物载紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与应用不可降解聚合物载依维莫司药物洗脱支架的血管造影结果:PRISON IV 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 23;10(2):133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.017.
6
Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.非常薄的支撑物可生物降解聚合物依维莫司洗脱和西罗莫司洗脱支架与全人群冠心病使用耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架(BIO-RESORT):一项三臂、随机、非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
7
Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.279. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
8
Biodegradable polymer stents vs second generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.可生物降解聚合物支架与第二代药物洗脱支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析与系统评价
World J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 26;8(2):240-6. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i2.240.
9
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.用于经皮冠状动脉血运重建的超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架对比:BIOSCIENCE试验的2年结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003255. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255.
10
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17.