Suppr超能文献

两种超薄可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在实际临床中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性注册研究中Genoss药物洗脱支架与Orsiro支架的对比

Safety and Efficacy of Two Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice: Genoss DES Stents Versus Orsiro Stents From a Prospective Registry.

作者信息

Jeon Ho Sung, Youn Young Jin, Lee Jung-Hee, Park Young Jun, Son Jung-Woo, Lee Jun-Won, Ahn Min-Soo, Ahn Sung Gyun, Kim Jang-Young, Yoo Byung-Su, Yoon Junghan

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70060. doi: 10.1002/clc.70060.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Orsiro and Genoss DES stents are biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (DESs) with ultrathin struts.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of these two ultrathin DESs in real-world practice.

METHODS

From a single-center prospective registry, we included 751 and 931 patients treated with the Genoss DES and Orsiro stents, respectively. After propensity score matching, we compared 483 patients in each group with respect to a device-oriented composite outcome (DOCO), which comprised cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization up to 2 follow-up years.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics. During the median follow-up period of 730 days (interquartile range, 427-730 days), there was no significant between-group difference in the DOCO rate (3.1% in the Genoss DES group vs. 2.9% in the Orsiro group, log-rank p = 0.847).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy between the Orsiro and Genoss DES stents during a 2-year follow-up period in real-world practice. However, this result should be confirmed in a large randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02038127.

摘要

背景

Orsiro和Genoss药物洗脱支架(DES)是具有超薄支架的可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架。

目的

在实际临床中研究这两种超薄药物洗脱支架的安全性和有效性。

方法

从一个单中心前瞻性注册研究中,我们分别纳入了751例接受Genoss DES治疗的患者和931例接受Orsiro支架治疗的患者。在倾向评分匹配后,我们比较了两组中各483例患者的器械导向复合结局(DOCO),该结局包括心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死以及在长达2年的随访期内临床指征的靶病变血运重建。

结果

倾向评分匹配后,两组在临床和血管造影特征方面无显著组间差异。在中位随访期730天(四分位间距,427 - 730天)内,DOCO发生率在组间无显著差异(Genoss DES组为3.1%,Orsiro组为2.9%,对数秩检验p = 0.847)。

结论

本研究表明,在实际临床中,Orsiro和Genoss DES支架在2年随访期内的安全性和有效性相当。然而,这一结果应在大型随机对照试验中得到证实。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02038127。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe18/11652947/dbdf9768ec3e/CLC-47-e70060-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验