• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架:一项荟萃分析。

Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Monjur Mohammad Riashad, Said Christian F, Bamford Paul, Parkinson Michael, Szirt Richard, Ford Thomas

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001394.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2020-001394
PMID:33046595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7552849/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Determine whether an ultrathin biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent ('Orsiro'-BP-SES) has clinical benefits over second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing Orsiro BP-SES against DP-DES (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42019147136). The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF): composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation (TLR)) evaluated at the longest available follow-up.

RESULTS

Nine trials randomised 11 302 patients to either Orsiro BP-SES or DP-DES. At mean weighted follow-up of 2.8 years, the primary outcome (TLF) occurred in 501 of 6089 (8.2%) participants with BP-SES compared with 495 of 5213 (9.5%) participants with DP-DES. This equates to an absolute risk reduction of 1.3% in TLF in favour of Orsiro BP-SES (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; p=0.03). This was driven by a reduction in TVMI (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98; p=0.03). There were no significant differences in other clinical endpoints: cardiac death, TLR and stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

The Orsiro BP-SES shows promising clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared with contemporary second-generation DES at a short to medium term follow-up. More research is warranted to evaluate performance over a longer follow-up period and in different clinical and lesion subsets.

摘要

目的

确定超薄可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(“Orsiro”生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架)是否比第二代耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架具有临床优势。

方法

我们对比较Orsiro生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的随机临床试验进行了前瞻性系统评价和荟萃分析(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库登记号:CRD42019147136)。主要结局是靶病变失败(心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和临床指征的靶病变血运重建的复合终点),在最长可及随访时进行评估。

结果

9项试验将11302例患者随机分为Orsiro生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架组或耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架组。在平均加权随访2.8年时,6089例接受生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的参与者中有501例(8.2%)发生主要结局(靶病变失败),而5213例接受耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的参与者中有495例(9.5%)发生。这相当于靶病变失败的绝对风险降低1.3%,有利于Orsiro生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(比值比0.82;95%置信区间0.69至0.98;p=0.03)。这是由靶血管心肌梗死的减少所驱动的(比值比0.80;95%置信区间0.65至0.98;p=0.03)。其他临床终点(心脏死亡、靶病变血运重建和支架血栓形成)无显著差异。

结论

在短期至中期随访中,与当代第二代药物洗脱支架相比,Orsiro生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中显示出有前景的临床结局。需要更多研究来评估更长随访期以及不同临床和病变亚组中的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/8ab6a9d7939d/openhrt-2020-001394f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/b727186e601e/openhrt-2020-001394f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/c506239c96d1/openhrt-2020-001394f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/26f9f131ac84/openhrt-2020-001394f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/96011c690291/openhrt-2020-001394f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/c1148d0b236b/openhrt-2020-001394f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/8ab6a9d7939d/openhrt-2020-001394f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/b727186e601e/openhrt-2020-001394f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/c506239c96d1/openhrt-2020-001394f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/26f9f131ac84/openhrt-2020-001394f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/96011c690291/openhrt-2020-001394f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/c1148d0b236b/openhrt-2020-001394f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e133/7552849/8ab6a9d7939d/openhrt-2020-001394f06.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架:一项荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001394.
2
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.用于经皮冠状动脉血运重建的超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架对比:BIOSCIENCE试验的2年结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003255. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255.
3
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:随机 BIOFLOW V 试验 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019.
4
Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的安全性和有效性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5.
5
Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中小血管病变患者应用超薄壁支架与薄壁药物洗脱支架的长期疗效:BIOSCIENCE 随机试验的亚组分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e008024. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008024. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
6
Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中比较超薄可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的亚组分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331.
7
Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在钙化或小血管病变中的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009189. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
8
Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建中,生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱超微支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的非选择性应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006741. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006741.
9
Five-Year Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.生物可降解聚合物药物洗脱支架与第二代耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的 5 年结果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019 Oct;33(5):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06912-x.
10
1-Year Clinical Outcomes of All Comers Treated With 2 Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of the COMBO and Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro Stents.全人群患者接受 2 款生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架治疗 1 年的临床结局:COMBO 和 Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro 支架倾向性评分匹配比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 13;13(7):820-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-A Narrative Review.药物洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4643. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134643.
2
Durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in all-comers.在所有患者中比较耐用型与可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架。
Open Heart. 2025 Mar 3;12(1):e003104. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003104.
3
Comparative effectiveness of ultrathin vs. standard strut drug-eluting stents: insights from a large-scale meta-analysis with extended follow-up.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:随机 BIOFLOW V 试验 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1343-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.019.
2
Thin Composite-Wire-Strut Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Ultrathin-Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in BIONYX at 2 Years.薄型复合丝网管雷帕霉素洗脱支架与 BIONYX 研究中 2 年时的超亲支架西罗莫司洗脱支架比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 11;13(9):1100-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.230.
3
超小径药物洗脱支架与标准支架的比较效果:一项具有延长随访的大规模荟萃分析的见解。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 27;29(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01949-7.
4
Long-term safety of ultrathin bioabsorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin durable-polymer drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物药物洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的长期安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1465-1473. doi: 10.1002/clc.24139. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
5
Clinical outcomes of an ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent in all-comers population: Thailand Orsiro registry.全人群中应用超亲水性雷帕霉素洗脱支架的临床疗效:泰国 Orsiro 注册研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02310-0.
Comparison of the Ultrathin Strut, Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-eluting Stent in a Chinese Population: The Randomized BIOFLOW VI Trial.
在中国人群中比较超薄支架、可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架和持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架:随机 BIOFLOW VI 试验。
Clin Ther. 2020 Apr;42(4):649-660.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
4
Three-year clinical outcome of biodegradable hybrid polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent and the durable biocompatible polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent: A randomized controlled trial.载西罗莫司可生物降解杂交聚合物 Orsiro 支架和 Resolute Integrity 佐他莫司洗脱可降解聚合物支架的 3 年临床结果:一项随机对照试验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):1399-1406. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28654. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的比较(BIOSTEMI):一项单盲、前瞻性、随机优效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1243-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable or Durable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT.薄、极薄或超薄支架,生物可降解或耐用聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架:BIO-RESORT 的 3 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1650-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.054. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
7
BIOFLOW-IV, a randomised, intercontinental, multicentre study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of subjects with de novo coronary artery lesions: primary outcome target vessel failure at 12 months.BIOFLOW-IV 是一项随机、洲际、多中心研究,旨在评估 Orsiro 西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗初发冠状动脉病变患者的安全性和有效性:12 个月时的主要终点靶血管失败。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 6;15(11):e1006-e1013. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01214.
8
The Elusive Late Benefit of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents.可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架难以捉摸的晚期益处
Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):334-336. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038378.
9
The Newest Generation of Drug-eluting Stents and Beyond.最新一代药物洗脱支架及未来发展
Eur Cardiol. 2018 Aug;13(1):54-59. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2018:8:2.
10
40 Years of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: History and Future Directions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗40年:历史与未来方向
J Pers Med. 2018 Oct 1;8(4):33. doi: 10.3390/jpm8040033.