School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):662-672. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
About a third of women receiving pethidine for labour pain subsequently require an epidural, which provides effective pain relief but increases the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in labour is an alternative to pethidine, but is not widely used. We aimed to evaluate epidural analgesia progression among women using remifentanil PCA compared with pethidine.
We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 14 UK maternity units. We included women aged 16 years or older, beyond 37 weeks' gestation, in labour with a singleton cephalic presentation, and who requested opioid pain relief. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1:1) to either the intravenous remifentanil PCA group (40 μg bolus on demand with a 2 min lockout) or the intramuscular pethidine group (100 mg every 4 h, up to 400 mg in 24 h), using a web-based or telephone randomisation service with a minimisation algorithm for parity, maternal age, ethnicity, and mode of labour onset. Because of the differences in routes of drug administration, study participants and health-care providers were not masked to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who received epidural analgesia after enrolment for pain relief in labour. Primary analyses were unadjusted and analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN29654603.
Between May 13, 2014, and Sept 2, 2016, 201 women were randomly assigned to the remifentanil PCA group and 200 to the pethidine group. One participant in the pethidine group withdrew consent, leaving 199 for analyses. The proportions of epidural conversion were 19% (39 of 201) in the remifentanil PCA group and 41% (81 of 199) in the pethidine group (risk ratio 0·48, 95% CI 0·34-0·66; p<0·0001). There were no serious adverse events or drug reactions directly attributable to either analgesic during the study.
Intravenous remifentanil PCA halved the proportion of epidural conversions compared with intramuscular pethidine. This finding challenges routine pethidine use as standard of care in labour.
National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Award.
大约三分之一接受哌替啶分娩镇痛的女性随后需要硬膜外麻醉,硬膜外麻醉虽能有效缓解疼痛,但会增加器械性阴道分娩的风险。分娩时使用瑞芬太尼患者自控镇痛(PCA)是哌替啶的替代方法,但尚未广泛应用。我们旨在评估与哌替啶相比,使用瑞芬太尼 PCA 的女性硬膜外镇痛进展情况。
我们在英国 14 家产科单位进行了一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验。我们纳入年龄在 16 岁及以上、妊娠 37 周以上、单胎头位分娩且要求使用阿片类药物缓解疼痛的女性。我们将符合条件的参与者(1:1)随机分配到静脉内瑞芬太尼 PCA 组(按需给予 40μg 推注,锁定时间为 2 分钟)或肌肉内哌替啶组(每 4 小时给予 100mg,24 小时内最多给予 400mg),使用基于网络或电话的随机分配服务,采用最小化算法,根据产次、产妇年龄、种族和分娩方式进行分组。由于药物给药途径不同,研究参与者和医疗保健提供者无法对分组分配进行盲法。主要结局是登记时因分娩疼痛而接受硬膜外镇痛的女性比例。主要分析为未调整分析,并根据意向治疗原则进行分析。本研究在 ISRCTN 注册中心注册,编号 ISRCTN29654603。
2014 年 5 月 13 日至 2016 年 9 月 2 日,共有 201 名参与者被随机分配到瑞芬太尼 PCA 组,200 名参与者被随机分配到哌替啶组。哌替啶组有 1 名参与者撤回了同意,199 名参与者被纳入分析。瑞芬太尼 PCA 组硬膜外转化的比例为 19%(201 名中的 39 名),哌替啶组为 41%(199 名中的 81 名)(风险比 0.48,95%CI 0.34-0.66;p<0.0001)。在研究期间,没有与任何一种镇痛药物直接相关的严重不良事件或药物反应。
与肌肉内哌替啶相比,静脉内瑞芬太尼 PCA 将硬膜外转化的比例减半。这一发现对常规使用哌替啶作为分娩标准护理提出了挑战。
英国国家卫生研究院临床科学家奖。