• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的meta 分析:随机对照试验研究

Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Münster, Oberdürrbacher Street 6, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Apr;29(4):177-85. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834fc260.

DOI:10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834fc260
PMID:22273829
Abstract

CONTEXT

Remifentanil is a potent short-acting μ-opioid receptor agonist which is rapidly metabolised in the mother and fetus and may be ideal for labour analgesia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety of remifentanil compared with other analgesic techniques for labour pain.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched the central register of controlled trials of the Cochrane Library (till August 2011) and MEDLINE (till August 2011).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials investigating efficacy and safety of remifentanil administered via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device compared with any other analgesic technique for labour pain were included.

RESULTS

We finally included 12 randomised controlled trials (published from 2001 to 2011). Women treated with remifentanil had a lower risk of conversion to epidural analgesia (P < 0.001), a lower mean pain score after 1 h (P < 0.001) and had higher satisfaction scores (P < 0.05) in comparison with women receiving pethidine. Epidural analgesia decreased pain scores compared with remifentanil (P = 0.003). There was only a limited amount of data comparing remifentanil with nitrous oxide or fentanyl. Serious maternal or fetal adverse outcomes were not reported in these trials.

CONCLUSION

During labour, remifentanil-PCA provided superior analgesia and higher patient satisfaction compared with pethidine with a comparable degree of adverse events. Epidural analgesia provided superior pain relief in comparison with remifentanil. Due to a low number of reported adverse events, the safety issue of remifentanil use in labour remains an open question that needs to be addressed in future trials.

摘要

背景

瑞芬太尼是一种强效的短效 μ 阿片受体激动剂,在母亲和胎儿中迅速代谢,可能是分娩镇痛的理想选择。

目的

评估瑞芬太尼与其他镇痛技术在分娩疼痛方面的疗效和安全性。

资料来源

我们系统地检索了 Cochrane 图书馆的对照试验中心登记处(截至 2011 年 8 月)和 MEDLINE(截至 2011 年 8 月)。

入选标准

纳入比较瑞芬太尼通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)装置给药与任何其他分娩疼痛镇痛技术的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。

结果

我们最终纳入了 12 项随机对照试验(发表于 2001 年至 2011 年)。与接受哌替啶的女性相比,接受瑞芬太尼治疗的女性转为硬膜外镇痛的风险较低(P<0.001),1 小时后平均疼痛评分较低(P<0.001),满意度评分较高(P<0.05)。与瑞芬太尼相比,硬膜外镇痛降低了疼痛评分(P=0.003)。比较瑞芬太尼与笑气或芬太尼的数据有限。这些试验中没有报告严重的母亲或胎儿不良结局。

结论

在分娩过程中,瑞芬太尼-PCA 与哌替啶相比提供了更好的镇痛效果和更高的患者满意度,不良反应发生率相当。与瑞芬太尼相比,硬膜外镇痛能更好地缓解疼痛。由于报告的不良事件数量较少,瑞芬太尼在分娩中的安全性问题仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,需要在未来的试验中解决。

相似文献

1
Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.瑞芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的meta 分析:随机对照试验研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Apr;29(4):177-85. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834fc260.
2
Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour.瑞芬太尼患者自控镇痛与其他胃肠外方法用于分娩疼痛管理的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 13;4(4):CD011989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011989.pub2.
3
Intravenous remifentanil vs. epidural levobupivacaine with fentanyl for pain relief in early labour: a randomised, controlled, double-blinded study.静脉注射瑞芬太尼与硬膜外注射左旋布比卡因联合芬太尼用于分娩早期镇痛的随机对照双盲研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Feb;52(2):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01509.x. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
4
Efficacy and side effects of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia used in a stepwise approach for labour: an observational study.静脉注射瑞芬太尼患者自控镇痛在阶梯式分娩中的疗效和副作用:一项观察性研究。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Jan;22(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
5
The RESPITE trial: remifentanil intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus pethidine intramuscular injection for pain relief in labour: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.缓解疼痛试验:静脉注射瑞芬太尼患者自控镇痛(PCA)与肌肉注射哌替啶用于分娩镇痛的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 12;17(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1708-3.
6
Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour (RESPITE): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.静脉注射瑞芬太尼患者自控镇痛与肌肉注射哌替啶用于分娩镇痛(RESPITE):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):662-672. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31613-1. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
A comparison of remifentanil parturient-controlled intravenous analgesia with epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.瑞芬太尼产妇自控静脉镇痛与硬膜外镇痛的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Mar;118(3):598-603. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000077.
8
Labour analgesia: a randomised, controlled trial comparing intravenous remifentanil and epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl.分娩镇痛:瑞芬太尼静脉镇痛与罗哌卡因和芬太尼硬膜外镇痛的随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Mar;29(3):129-36. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834dfa98.
9
The analgesic efficacy of remifentanil for labour. Systematic review of the recent literature.瑞芬太尼用于分娩的镇痛效果:近期文献的系统评价
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016 Mar;160(1):30-8. doi: 10.5507/bp.2015.043. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
10
Intravenous remifentanil versus epidural ropivacaine with sufentanil for labour analgesia: a retrospective study.静脉注射瑞芬太尼与硬膜外注射罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 11;9(11):e112283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112283. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
A Survey of Obstetric Anaesthesia Services and Practices in the United Kingdom.英国产科麻醉服务与实践调查
Cureus. 2024 Oct 4;16(10):e70851. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70851. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Comparative efficacy of opioid and non-opioid analgesics in labor pain management: A network meta-analysis.阿片类药物和非阿片类药物在分娩镇痛管理中的比较疗效:网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 18;19(6):e0303174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303174. eCollection 2024.
3
Remifentanil at a Relatively Elevated Dose in Active Phase is Safe and More Suitable Than Fixed Lower Dose for Intravenous Labor Analgesia.
在活跃期使用相对高剂量的瑞芬太尼用于静脉分娩镇痛比固定低剂量更安全且更合适。
J Pain Res. 2023 Jul 24;16:2543-2552. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S419076. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of different delivery modalities of epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in labour: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.分娩时硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛不同给药方式的比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Mar;70(3):406-442. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02389-9. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
5
Anesthesia efficacy of bupivacaine in pregnant participants with breech presentation receiving external cephalic version: A protocol of systematic review of randomized controlled trials.布比卡因用于臀先露孕妇行外倒转术的麻醉效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20786. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020786.
6
Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.评估系统评价中质量或偏倚风险的方法学工具和敏感性分析,发表于高影响力的麻醉学期刊。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 18;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00966-4.
7
Qualitative exploration of women's experiences of intramuscular pethidine or remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour pain.肌肉注射哌替啶或瑞芬太尼自控镇痛用于分娩疼痛的女性体验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e032203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032203.
8
Remifentanil analgesia during external cephalic version for breech presentation in nulliparous women at term: A randomized controlled trial.足月未产妇臀位外倒转术中瑞芬太尼镇痛:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(11):e6256. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006256.
9
A randomized trial of remifentanil for analgesia in external cephalic version for breech presentation.瑞芬太尼用于臀位外倒转术镇痛的随机试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(49):e5483. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005483.
10
Remifentanil for labor analgesia: a comprehensive review.瑞芬太尼用于分娩镇痛:一项综述
J Anesth. 2016 Dec;30(6):1020-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2233-y. Epub 2016 Sep 12.