Suppr超能文献

冷冻疗法与二氧化碳激光治疗跖疣的随机对照试验

Cryotherapy versus CO laser in the treatment of plantar warts: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Boroujeni Nahid Hemmatian, Handjani Farhad

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Molecular Dermatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Dermatol Pract Concept. 2018 Jul 31;8(3):168-173. doi: 10.5826/dpc.0803a03. eCollection 2018 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Warts are one of the most common infections in humans. Plantar warts are a subtype of non-genital warts, and several procedures and topical treatments have been used in its treatment. Cryotherapy is one of the most popular modalities, but it is time-consuming and remission rates vary in different studies. CO laser was the first laser used for treating warts. To date, no clinical trial has been done to compare CO laser with cryotherapy in the treatment of plantar warts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was performed in order to compare the efficacy and number of sessions needed to treat plantar warts in 60 patients who had received no previous treatment in the previous 3 months. They were randomly allocated to the cryotherapy or CO laser group. The number of sessions needed for response and the recurrence rate after a 3-month follow-up was compared in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with plantar warts were randomly allocated to either the CO laser or cryotherapy groups. Median age was 25 (range=18-53) and 27 (range= 18-75) years in the cryotherapy group and CO laser groups, respectively. Both groups were matched for age and sex (56% male and 44% female in the cryotherapy group and 34% male and 66% female in the CO laser group). The median number of sessions needed for complete resolution of the warts in the CO laser and cryotherapy groups were 1 (range=1-2) and 3 (range=1-12), respectively. The difference in the number of sessions was statistically significant between the 2 groups (P-value≤0.001). Recurrence rates after a 3-month follow-up was not statistically significant (P-value= 0.069).

CONCLUSION

The number of sessions needed to treat plantar warts was less using CO laser than cryotherapy; therefore, this modality can be a good addition to the already existing anti-wart armamentarium.

摘要

背景

疣是人类最常见的感染之一。跖疣是非生殖器疣的一种亚型,其治疗方法包括多种手术和局部治疗。冷冻疗法是最常用的方法之一,但耗时较长,且不同研究中的缓解率有所差异。CO2激光是最早用于治疗疣的激光。迄今为止,尚无临床试验比较CO2激光与冷冻疗法治疗跖疣的效果。

患者与方法

本随机对照试验旨在比较60例前3个月未接受过治疗的跖疣患者接受冷冻疗法或CO2激光治疗的疗效及所需治疗次数。将患者随机分为冷冻疗法组或CO2激光组。比较两组达到疗效所需的治疗次数及3个月随访后的复发率。

结果

60例跖疣患者被随机分为CO2激光组或冷冻疗法组。冷冻疗法组和CO2激光组的中位年龄分别为25岁(范围18 - 53岁)和27岁(范围18 - 75岁)。两组在年龄和性别上相匹配(冷冻疗法组男性占56%,女性占44%;CO2激光组男性占34%,女性占66%)。CO2激光组和冷冻疗法组使疣体完全消退所需的中位治疗次数分别为1次(范围1 - 2次)和3次(范围1 - 12次)。两组治疗次数的差异具有统计学意义(P值≤0.001)。3个月随访后的复发率无统计学意义(P值 = 0.069)。

结论

与冷冻疗法相比,CO2激光治疗跖疣所需的治疗次数更少;因此,这种方法可以成为现有抗疣治疗手段中的一个很好补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c93/6092077/2a53bea060de/dp0803a03g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验