Heart and Vascular Research Center, Department of Medicine, MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, Ohio.
L'Institut du Thorax, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Nantes, Nantes , France.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018 Nov 1;315(5):H1250-H1257. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00721.2017. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Mutations in voltage-gated Na channels have been linked to several channelopathies leading to a wide variety of diseases including cardiac arrhythmias, epilepsy, and myotonia. We have previously demonstrated that voltage-gated Na channel (Na)1.5 trafficking-deficient mutant channels could lead to a dominant negative effect by impairing trafficking of the wild-type (WT) channel. We also reported that voltage-gated Na channels associate as dimers with coupled gating properties. Here, we hypothesized that the dominant negative effect of mutant Na channels could also occur through coupled gating. This was tested using cell surface biotinylation and single channel recordings to measure the gating probability and coupled gating of the dimers. As previously reported, coexpression of Na1.5-L325R with WT channels led to a dominant negative effect, as reflected by a 75% reduction in current density. Surprisingly, cell surface biotinylation showed that Na1.5-L325R mutant is capable of trafficking, with 40% of Na1.5-L325R reaching the cell surface when expressed alone. Importantly, even though a dominant negative effect on the Na current is observed when WT and Na1.5-L325R are expressed together, the total Na channel cell surface expression was not significantly altered compared with WT channels alone. Thus, the trafficking deficiency could not explain the 75% decrease in inward Na current. Interestingly, single channel recordings showed that Na1.5-L325R exerted a dominant negative effect on the WT channel at the gating level. Both coupled gating and gating probability of WT:L325R dimers were drastically impaired. We conclude that dominant negative suppression exerted by Na1.5 mutants can also be caused by impairing the WT gating probability, a mechanism resulting from the dimerization and coupled gating of voltage-gated Na channel α-subunits. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The presence of dominant negative mutations in the Na channel gene leading to Brugada syndrome was supported by our recent findings that Na channel α-subunits form dimers. Up until now, the dominant negative effect was thought to be caused by the interaction of the wild-type Na channel with trafficking-deficient mutant channels. However, the present study demonstrates that coupled gating of voltage-gated Na channels can also be responsible for the dominant negative effect leading to arrhythmias.
电压门控钠通道中的突变与多种通道病有关,导致广泛的疾病,包括心律失常、癫痫和肌强直。我们之前已经证明,电压门控钠通道(Na)1.5 转运缺陷型突变体通道可能通过损害野生型(WT)通道的转运而导致显性负效应。我们还报告称,电压门控钠通道以二聚体形式存在,并具有偶联门控特性。在这里,我们假设突变型 Na 通道的显性负效应也可能通过偶联门控发生。这是通过使用细胞表面生物素化和单通道记录来测量二聚体的门控概率和偶联门控来测试的。如前所述,Na1.5-L325R 与 WT 通道共表达导致显性负效应,表现为电流密度降低 75%。令人惊讶的是,细胞表面生物素化显示 Na1.5-L325R 突变体能够转运,当单独表达时,40%的 Na1.5-L325R 到达细胞表面。重要的是,尽管当 WT 和 Na1.5-L325R 一起表达时观察到对 Na 电流的显性负效应,但与单独表达 WT 通道相比,Na 通道的总细胞表面表达没有显著改变。因此,转运缺陷不能解释内向 Na 电流降低 75%。有趣的是,单通道记录显示 Na1.5-L325R 在门控水平对 WT 通道产生显性负效应。WT:L325R 二聚体的偶联门控和门控概率均受到严重损害。我们得出结论,Na1.5 突变体施加的显性负抑制也可能是由于 WT 门控概率受损引起的,这是一种源自电压门控 Na 通道α亚基二聚化和偶联门控的机制。新的和值得注意的是,导致 Brugada 综合征的 Na 通道基因中的显性负突变的存在得到了我们最近的发现的支持,即 Na 通道α亚基形成二聚体。到目前为止,显性负效应被认为是由于野生型 Na 通道与转运缺陷型突变体通道的相互作用引起的。然而,本研究表明,电压门控 Na 通道的偶联门控也可能导致导致心律失常的显性负效应。