Adelgais Kathleen M, Sholl J Matthew, Alter Rachael, Gurley Kristin Lauria, Broadwater-Hollifield Camille, Taillac Peter
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):167-178. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1495284. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Individual states, regions, and local emergency medical service (EMS) agencies are responsible for the development and implementation of prehospital patient care protocols. Many states lack model prehospital guidelines for managing common conditions. Recently developed national evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) may address this gap. Barriers to statewide dissemination and implementation of model guidelines have not been studied. The objective of this study was to examine barriers and enablers to dissemination and implementation of an evidence-based guideline for traumatic pain management across 5 states.
This study used mixed methods to evaluate the statewide dissemination and implementation of a prehospital EBG. The guideline provided pain assessment tools, recommended opiate medication dosing, and indications and contraindications for analgesia. Participating states were provided an implementation toolkit, standardized training materials, and a state-specific implementation plan. Outcomes were assessed via an electronic self-assessment tool in which states reported barriers and enablers to dissemination and implementation and information about changes in pain management practices in their states after implementation of the EBG.
Of the 5 participating states, 3 reported dissemination of the guideline, one through a state model guideline process and 2 through regional EMS systems. Two states did not disseminate or implement the guideline. Of these, one state chose to utilize a locally developed guideline, and the other state did not perform guideline dissemination at the state level. Barriers to state implementation were the lack of authority at the state level to mandate protocols, technical challenges with learning management systems, and inability to track and monitor training and implementation at the agency level. Enablers included having a state/regional EMS office champion and the availability of an implementation toolkit. No participating states demonstrated an increase in opioid delivery to patients during the study period.
Statewide dissemination and implementation of an EBG is complex with many challenges. Future efforts should consider the advantages of having statewide model or mandatory guidelines and the value of local champions and be aware of the challenges of a statewide learning management system and of tracking the success of implementation efforts.
各个州、地区以及当地的紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构负责制定和实施院前患者护理协议。许多州缺乏管理常见病症的院前示范指南。最近制定的国家循证指南(EBG)可能会填补这一空白。尚未对全州范围内传播和实施示范指南的障碍进行研究。本研究的目的是调查在5个州传播和实施创伤性疼痛管理循证指南的障碍和促进因素。
本研究采用混合方法评估全州范围内院前EBG的传播和实施情况。该指南提供了疼痛评估工具,推荐了阿片类药物剂量以及镇痛的适应症和禁忌症。向参与的州提供了实施工具包、标准化培训材料和针对该州的实施计划。通过电子自我评估工具评估结果,各州在该工具中报告传播和实施的障碍与促进因素,以及实施EBG后该州疼痛管理实践变化的信息。
在参与的5个州中,3个州报告了该指南的传播情况,1个州通过州示范指南程序传播,2个州通过地区EMS系统传播。2个州未传播或实施该指南。其中,1个州选择使用当地制定的指南,另1个州未在州一级进行指南传播。州一级实施的障碍包括州一级缺乏强制协议的权力、学习管理系统的技术挑战以及无法在机构层面跟踪和监测培训与实施情况。促进因素包括有州/地区EMS办公室的支持以及有实施工具包。在研究期间,没有参与的州显示向患者提供的阿片类药物有所增加。
全州范围内传播和实施EBG很复杂且面临诸多挑战。未来的努力应考虑制定全州示范或强制指南的优势以及当地支持者的价值,并意识到全州学习管理系统的挑战以及跟踪实施工作成功情况的挑战。