Department of Physiotherapy , Faculty of Health Care, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Care, University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 18;24:5761-5770. doi: 10.12659/MSM.909183.
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a rehabilitation program in changing the perception of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study involved 65 respondents/patients with clinically confirmed multiple sclerosis (54 women, 11 men, average age 46.49 years). The evaluation of the effects of fatigue on the physical, psychological, and psychosocial aspects of life was assessed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). To test the effectiveness of the neurorehabilitation program, we enrolled 2 groups: the experimental group (EG, n=32, 29 women, 3 men, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 4.8 average, SD±1.77, min. 1.5 max 8.0) participated in the intervention and rehabilitation program over a period of 12 weeks and the control group (CG, n=33, 25 women, 8 men. EDSS average 5.12±1.74 SD, min. 2.0 max. 8.0). Each group of patients was divided into 3 sub-groups according to the severity of EDSS: a) 1-3.5, b) 4-6, and c) 6.5-8. For the statistical evaluation of the significance of the observed changes, the MANOVA/ANOVA model was used. RESULTS Between the input and output assessment of the MFIS individual areas questionnaire between the EG and the CG, there existed a statistically significant in the physical area (p<0.000), psychological area (p<0.000), and psychosocial area (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS Our results support the importance of an active approach in patients with multiple sclerosis using individualized rehabilitation intervention programs.
本研究的目的是评估康复计划对多发性硬化症患者疲劳感的改变效果。
研究共纳入 65 名(54 名女性,11 名男性)经临床确诊的多发性硬化症患者。使用修正后的疲劳影响量表(MFIS)评估疲劳对身体、心理和社会心理生活方面的影响。为了测试神经康复计划的有效性,我们招募了两个组:实验组(EG,n=32,29 名女性,3 名男性,扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)平均 4.8,SD±1.77,最小值 1.5,最大值 8.0)参加了为期 12 周的干预和康复计划,对照组(CG,n=33,25 名女性,8 名男性,EDSS 平均 5.12±1.74,SD,最小值 2.0,最大值 8.0)。根据 EDSS 的严重程度,每组患者分为 3 个子组:a)1-3.5,b)4-6,和 c)6.5-8。为了评估观察到的变化的显著性,使用 MANOVA/ANOVA 模型进行了统计评估。
在 EG 和 CG 之间的 MFIS 个体区域问卷的输入和输出评估之间,在身体区域(p<0.000)、心理区域(p<0.000)和社会心理区域(p=0.002)存在统计学显著差异。
我们的结果支持在多发性硬化症患者中采用个体化康复干预计划的积极方法的重要性。