• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与丹麦一项关于增强癌症患者权能的项目——经验及对进一步实践的早期建议。

User involvement in a Danish project on the empowerment of cancer patients - experiences and early recommendations for further practice.

作者信息

Jørgensen Clara R, Eskildsen Nanna B, Johnsen Anna T

机构信息

1Department for Disability Inclusion and Special Needs, School of Education, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, Birmingham UK.

2Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Aug 13;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0105-3. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-018-0105-3
PMID:30123531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6088427/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper reports on the process of involving former and current cancer patients and carers as co-researchers in a Danish mixed methods research project on patient empowerment of cancer patients in follow up (The Empowerment study 2015-2019). User-Involvement in health care research is a relatively new practice in Denmark and the Empowerment project was one of the first to systematically involve patients and carers in its research design, conduct and reporting. The paper has two aims: first, it provides a detailed account of the process of involving co-researchers in the Empowerment project and second, it presents findings from a workshop held with academic researchers and co-researchers on the project to discuss their experiences and recommendations for user-involvement in the Danish context.

METHODS

The Empowerment project adopted a consultative and collaborative approach to user involvement and co-researchers were involved from the early stages and all through the project. Users gave feedback on the proposal, helped develop project documents and research tools, acted as peer interviewers in qualitative interviews, participated in data analysis and development of questionnaires, and co-authored journal articles. The workshop held with the academic researchers and co-researchers consisted of two parallel focus groups and a joint group discussion, following an interactive and informal format to facilitate discussion and exchange of ideas.

FINDINGS

The focus group resulted in eleven recommendations for the further development of user-involvement in Denmark. Key issues encountered were the general lack of guidelines on user-involvement in the Danish context and the need for more organisational support. Particular issues, such as payment, recruitment and training, need to be carefully considered within individual projects and within the national context in which projects are carried out.

CONCLUSION

The paper adds to the current very limited knowledge base on user-involvement in the Danish context and provides a set of early recommendations for the further development of the practice in Danish Health Research. User-involvement needs to be developed with consideration to the local context, but common challenges also emphasise the usefulness of cross-country comparisons and knowledge exchange.

摘要

背景

本文报告了在一项丹麦混合方法研究项目中,让癌症患者及护理人员作为共同研究者参与其中的过程。该项目旨在研究如何在后续阶段增强癌症患者的自主权(“赋权研究”,2015 - 2019年)。在丹麦,让用户参与医疗保健研究是一种相对较新的做法,而“赋权项目”是最早系统地让患者和护理人员参与研究设计、实施及报告的项目之一。本文有两个目的:其一,详细阐述在“赋权项目”中让共同研究者参与的过程;其二,展示与该项目的学术研究人员和共同研究者举办的一次研讨会的结果,会上讨论了他们在丹麦背景下用户参与方面的经验及建议。

方法

“赋权项目”采用协商与合作的方式让用户参与,共同研究者从项目早期就参与进来并贯穿始终。用户对提案提供反馈,协助制定项目文件和研究工具,在定性访谈中担任同行访谈员,参与数据分析和问卷编制,并共同撰写期刊文章。与学术研究人员和共同研究者举办的研讨会由两个平行的焦点小组和一次联合小组讨论组成,采用互动和非正式的形式以促进讨论和思想交流。

结果

焦点小组针对丹麦用户参与的进一步发展提出了十一条建议。遇到的关键问题是丹麦缺乏用户参与的总体指导方针以及需要更多的组织支持。诸如报酬、招募和培训等具体问题,需要在各个项目以及开展项目的国家背景下仔细考虑。

结论

本文增加了丹麦背景下关于用户参与的当前非常有限的知识基础,并为丹麦卫生研究中该实践的进一步发展提供了一系列早期建议。用户参与需要结合当地情况来发展,但共同的挑战也凸显了跨国比较和知识交流的有用性。

相似文献

1
User involvement in a Danish project on the empowerment of cancer patients - experiences and early recommendations for further practice.患者参与丹麦一项关于增强癌症患者权能的项目——经验及对进一步实践的早期建议。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Aug 13;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0105-3. eCollection 2018.
2
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
3
Patient Engagement in Research Scale (PEIRS-22): Danish translation, applicability, and user experiences.患者参与研究量表(PEIRS - 22):丹麦语翻译、适用性及用户体验
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 7;9(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00526-2.
4
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
5
A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges.一项关于设立一项涉及非专业共同研究者的健康研究的益处与成本的联合研究,以及我们是如何克服这些挑战的。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 3;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3. eCollection 2016.
6
'Getting our voices heard in research: a review of peer researcher's roles and experiences on a qualitative study of adult safeguarding policy.在研究中让我们的声音被听到:对同伴研究者在成人保护政策定性研究中的角色和经历的综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 28;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00403-4.
7
"The Road We Travel": Developing a co-produced narrative for a photovoice project.《我们走过的路》:为摄影展项目制作合作叙事。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):632-643. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12709. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Exploring Elinor Ostrom's principles for collaborative group working within a user-led project: lessons from a collaboration between researchers and a user-led organisation.探索埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆在用户主导项目中进行协作式团队合作的原则:来自研究人员与用户主导组织合作的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 29;10(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00548-4.
9
Recommendations for successful involvement of patient partners in complex intervention research: a collaborative learning process.患者合作伙伴成功参与复杂干预研究的建议:一个协作学习过程。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 3;10(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00533-3.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in research: a survey on experience, opinions and training needs of gynecologic oncologists in two collaborative groups in Italy.患者及公众参与研究:对意大利两个协作组的妇科肿瘤学家的经验、意见及培训需求的调查
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 31;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00701-7.
2
The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.生活经历的重要性:关于患者和公众参与健康研究价值的范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70205. doi: 10.1111/hex.70205.
3
Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.确定患者合作伙伴在研究团队中的角色:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00664-1.
4
Asking those who know their needs best: A framework for active engagement and involvement of childhood cancer survivors and parents in the process of psychosocial research-A workshop report.让最了解需求的人参与:一项在心理社会研究中积极争取儿童癌症幸存者及其父母参与的框架 - 研讨会报告
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 May;7(5):e2071. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2071.
5
Public and patient involvement: a survey on knowledge, experience and opinions among researchers within a precision oncology European project.公众和患者参与:一项针对精准肿瘤学欧洲项目研究人员的知识、经验和意见的调查。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):814. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11262-x.
6
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
7
Good to know - This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research.好的,这是 PPIE!一个用于公众和患者参与儿科肿瘤学研究的培训工具的开发。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Jun;6(6):e1835. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1835. Epub 2023 May 11.
8
Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a mixed methods research protocol.认识患者合作伙伴对健康研究的贡献:一项混合方法研究方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 6;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00354-w.
9
Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.生成创新研究思路的方法和提高现代流行病学研究中患者和公众参与度的方法:综述、患者观点以及实施数字队列研究的指南。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e25743. doi: 10.2196/25743.
10
How to foster successful implementation of a patient reported experience measurement in the disability sector: an example of developing strategies in co-creation.如何促进在残疾领域成功实施患者报告体验测量:共同创造中制定策略的一个例子
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 24;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00287-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Power to the people: To what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this?权力属于人民:公众参与应用健康研究在多大程度上做到了这一点?
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Aug 17;2:28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0042-y. eCollection 2016.
2
The impact of using peer interviewers in a study of patient empowerment amongst people in cancer follow-up.在一项关于癌症随访患者赋权的研究中使用同伴访谈员的影响。
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):620-627. doi: 10.1111/hex.12655. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
The impact of involvement on researchers: a learning experience.参与对研究人员的影响:一次学习经历。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Sep 18;3:20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0071-1. eCollection 2017.
4
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
5
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.学会协同合作——一项关于公众参与的研究项目反思性分析的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.
6
A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges.一项关于设立一项涉及非专业共同研究者的健康研究的益处与成本的联合研究,以及我们是如何克服这些挑战的。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 3;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0021-3. eCollection 2016.
7
From tokenism to meaningful engagement: best practices in patient involvement in an EU project.从表面文章到有意义的参与:患者参与欧盟项目的最佳实践
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0004-9. eCollection 2015.
8
What Facilitates "Patient Empowerment" in Cancer Patients During Follow-Up: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Literature.促进癌症患者随访期间“患者赋权”的因素:文献的定性系统评价。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jan;28(2):292-304. doi: 10.1177/1049732317721477. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
9
Conceptualizing patient empowerment in cancer follow-up by combining theory and qualitative data.通过结合理论与定性数据来构思癌症随访中的患者赋权问题。
Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):232-238. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267403. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Patient empowerment: a systematic review of questionnaires measuring empowerment in cancer patients.患者赋权:对测量癌症患者赋权情况的问卷的系统评价
Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):156-165. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267402. Epub 2017 Jan 12.