• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与对研究人员的影响:一次学习经历。

The impact of involvement on researchers: a learning experience.

作者信息

Staley Kristina, Abbey-Vital Isabelle, Nolan Claire

机构信息

TwoCan Associates, Montague House, 4 St. Mary's Street, Ross on Wye, HR9 5HT UK.

Parkinson's UK, 215 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London, SW1V 1EJ UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Sep 18;3:20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0071-1. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-017-0071-1
PMID:29062545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5611580/
Abstract

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

The impacts of involvement in research are often described in terms of the difference made to the research, the people involved and less frequently the researchers. This paper focuses on the researchers' experiences of involvement, based on an evaluation of a pilot project supporting patient/carer involvement in research at Parkinson's UK. Telephone interviews were conducted with researchers from eight different research projects with involvement. The researchers reported gaining new knowledge from patients and carers. They used this knowledge to change their project designs, interventions and new devices. They also gained new skills in communicating with the public. Meeting patients for the first time had a profound impact on some researchers, causing a change in their professional values. Face-to-face contact seemed particularly important to gain a sense of the 'people behind the data', which suggests such meetings may result in impacts beyond those typically achieved through an exchange of documents. Involvement also influenced one researcher's choices and preferences, in terms of who to ask to take part in their study In summary, researchers often learn something new from talking to patients and carers. Facilitating this conversation seems important to maximise the impact of this learning. In future, it might be helpful for evaluations of involvement to ask researchers in more detail about what they learnt from patients/carers and how they applied their new skills and knowledge. This may help to understand how involvement can influence researchers' thinking to have an impact on research.

ABSTRACT

The impacts of patient/public involvement are often described in terms of the difference made to the research, the researchers and the people involved. Involvement often impacts on by influencing the design, delivery and dissemination. Patients/the public report gaining new skills and knowledge, increased self-confidence, and satisfaction from making a difference. There are fewer reports of the impacts on . This paper discusses the findings from an evaluation of a pilot project supporting patient/carer involvement in research at Parkinson's UK, focusing on the researchers' experiences. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with one researcher from each of the eight research projects which involved patients/carers in the pilot. The findings were analysed using theoretical thematic analysis. Learning can be described as acquiring new knowledge, behaviours, skills, values, or preferences. The researchers' reports reflected these different types of learning. They reported gaining new knowledge from patients and carers, which they recognised as distinct from their textbook knowledge of the condition. They used this learning to change their project designs and their new interventions and devices. They also gained new skills in communicating with patients and carers about the aims and significance of their research. Meeting patients for the first time had a profound impact on some researchers causing them to change their professional values. Face-to-face contact seemed particularly important to gain a sense of the 'people behind the data', which suggests such meetings may result in impacts beyond those typically achieved through an exchange of documents. The involvement also influenced one researchers' priorities and preferences, in terms of what questions to ask and of whom, in their project. Researchers learn from an exchange of knowledge with patients/ carers, which influences their plans and actions. This seems to be one way that involvement subsequently has an impact on research. Facilitating this exchange seems important to support mutual learning and to enhance the impact on researchers. Future evaluations of involvement might benefit from exploring what researchers learnt from patients/carers and how they applied their new skills and knowledge.

摘要

通俗易懂的总结

参与研究的影响通常从对研究、相关人员以及较少提及的研究人员所产生的差异方面来描述。本文基于对英国帕金森病协会支持患者/护理人员参与研究的一个试点项目的评估,聚焦于研究人员的参与体验。对来自八个不同参与研究项目的研究人员进行了电话访谈。研究人员报告称从患者和护理人员那里获得了新知识。他们利用这些知识来改变项目设计、干预措施和新设备。他们还在与公众沟通方面获得了新技能。首次与患者会面给一些研究人员带来了深刻影响,导致他们的职业价值观发生了变化。面对面接触对于了解“数据背后的人”似乎尤为重要,这表明此类会面可能产生的影响超出了通常通过文件交流所能达到的程度。参与还在选择让谁参与其研究方面影响了一位研究人员的选择和偏好。总之,研究人员经常从与患者和护理人员的交谈中学到新东西。促进这种交流对于最大化这种学习的影响似乎很重要。未来,对参与情况的评估或许更详细地询问研究人员从患者/护理人员那里学到了什么以及他们如何运用新技能和知识会有所帮助。这可能有助于理解参与如何能影响研究人员的思维从而对研究产生影响。

摘要

患者/公众参与的影响通常从对研究、研究人员和相关人员所产生的差异方面来描述。参与往往通过影响设计、实施和传播来产生影响。患者/公众报告称获得了新技能和知识、增强了自信以及因做出贡献而感到满足。关于对研究人员的影响的报告较少。本文讨论了对英国帕金森病协会支持患者/护理人员参与研究的一个试点项目的评估结果,重点关注研究人员的体验。对八个涉及患者/护理人员参与试点的研究项目中的每个项目的一名研究人员进行了半结构化电话访谈。使用理论主题分析法对研究结果进行了分析。学习可以被描述为获取新知识、行为、技能、价值观或偏好。研究人员的报告反映了这些不同类型的学习。他们报告称从患者和护理人员那里获得了新知识,他们认识到这与他们关于该病症的书本知识不同。他们利用这种学习来改变项目设计以及新的干预措施和设备。他们还在与患者和护理人员就其研究的目的和意义进行沟通方面获得了新技能。首次与患者会面给一些研究人员带来了深刻影响,使他们改变了职业价值观。面对面接触对于了解“数据背后的人”似乎尤为重要,这表明此类会面可能产生的影响超出了通常通过文件交流所能达到的程度。参与还在项目中询问什么问题以及询问谁方面影响了一位研究人员的优先事项和偏好。研究人员通过与患者/护理人员的知识交流来学习,这会影响他们的计划和行动。这似乎是参与随后对研究产生影响的一种方式。促进这种交流对于支持相互学习以及增强对研究人员的影响似乎很重要。未来对参与情况的评估或许通过探索研究人员从患者/护理人员那里学到了什么以及他们如何运用新技能和知识而受益。

相似文献

1
The impact of involvement on researchers: a learning experience.参与对研究人员的影响:一次学习经历。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Sep 18;3:20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0071-1. eCollection 2017.
2
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
3
'Is it worth doing?' Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research.“这值得做吗?”衡量患者及公众参与研究的影响。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jul 31;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5. eCollection 2015.
4
"We know that our voices are valued, and that people are actually going to listen": co-producing an evaluation of a young people's research advisory group.“我们知道我们的声音受到重视,而且人们真的会倾听”:共同开展一项针对青少年研究咨询小组的评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 20;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00419-4.
5
Who should I involve in my research and why? Patients, carers or the public?我应该让谁参与我的研究,为什么?患者、护理人员还是公众?
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00282-1.
6
Reporting and appraising the context, process and impact of PPI on contributors, researchers and the trial during a randomised controlled trial - the 3D study.在一项随机对照试验(3D研究)中报告和评估患者及公众参与(PPI)对参与者、研究人员和试验的背景、过程及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 14;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0098-y. eCollection 2018.
7
Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting.患者及护理人员参与方面错失的影响机会:一项关于研究优先级设定的混合方法案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 4;1:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0007-6. eCollection 2015.
8
Patient involvement in clinical trials: motivation and expectations differ between patients and researchers involved in a trial on urinary tract infections.患者参与临床试验:参与尿路感染试验的患者与研究人员的动机和期望存在差异。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Apr 1;5:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0145-3. eCollection 2019.
9
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: reflections and experiences of the PPI contributors and researcher.患者及公众参与博士研究:PPI参与者与研究者的思考及经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 11;6:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00201-w. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Barriers to Engagement With a Prostate Cancer Research and Genetic Risk Service Among UK Men of Black African or Black Caribbean Ancestry.了解英国非洲裔或加勒比裔黑人男性参与前列腺癌研究和遗传风险服务的障碍。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70282. doi: 10.1111/hex.70282.
2
Stakeholders' perspectives on communicating biosecurity to encourage behavior change in farmers.利益相关者对生物安全信息传播以鼓励农民改变行为的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 19;12:1562648. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1562648. eCollection 2025.
3
Development of a Framework for Youth- and Family-Specific Engagement in Research: Proposal for a Scoping Review and Qualitative Descriptive Study.制定针对青年和家庭的研究参与框架:范围综述和定性描述性研究的提案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 28;14:e65733. doi: 10.2196/65733.
4
Co-creating tools for embedding meaningful patient and public involvement and engagement in real-world data and evidence research in the pharmaceutical industry setting: a multistakeholder participatory co-design study.共同创建工具,以在制药行业环境中切实将患者和公众参与及融入真实世界数据与证据研究:一项多利益相关方参与式协同设计研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 17;15(2):e088914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088914.
5
The Views of Healthcare Professionals on iFall, a Smartphone Application for Falls Reporting in Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员对iFall(一款用于帕金森病跌倒报告的智能手机应用程序)的看法:一项定性研究。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2025 Feb 1;38(5):8919887251317728. doi: 10.1177/08919887251317728.
6
Engaging older adults in the process of aging research: a multimethod study evaluating the experience and efficacy of a citizen advisory group for a dementia risk reduction program.让老年人参与衰老研究过程:一项多方法研究,评估公民咨询小组对降低痴呆风险项目的体验及成效。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 27;10(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00643-6.
7
Confidence, attitude, and practice of scientific research among health professions' students in the United Arab Emirates.阿联酋卫生专业学生的科研信心、态度和实践。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304357. eCollection 2024.
8
'Practice what you preach'. Perspectives on the involvement of people with dementia and carers in community-based dementia friendly initiatives, a qualitative study.“言行一致”。关于痴呆症患者及其照料者参与社区痴呆友好型倡议的观点,一项定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 16;15:1387536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387536. eCollection 2024.
9
Individual Placement and Support for persons with alcohol and drug addiction in a Swedish context (IPS-ADAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.个体安置和支持在瑞典背景下的酒精和药物成瘾者(IPS-ADAS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Mar 27;25(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08007-x.
10
What motivates public collaborators to become and stay involved in health research?是什么促使公众合作者参与并持续投身于健康研究?
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 12;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00555-5.

本文引用的文献

1
It's not evidence, it's insight: bringing patients' perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE.这并非证据,而是深刻见解:将患者的观点纳入英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的卫生技术评估之中。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 24;2:4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0018-y. eCollection 2016.
2
Patients', clinicians' and the research communities' priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch.患者、临床医生和研究团体在治疗研究方面的优先事项:存在重大不匹配。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0003-x. eCollection 2015.
3
Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research?对个人的影响:患者和护理人员参与研究能获得什么、失去什么以及期望得到什么?
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):28-35. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101424. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
5
What has been the effect on trial outcome assessments of a decade of patient participation in OMERACT?十年来患者参与 OMERACT 对临床试验结果评估有何影响?
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;41(1):177-84. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130816. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
6
Patient and public involvement in health research: ethical imperative and/or radical challenge?患者和公众参与健康研究:道德的必然要求还是激进的挑战?
J Health Psychol. 2014 Jan;19(1):149-58. doi: 10.1177/1359105313500249. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
7
Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.患者及服务使用者参与研究:一项系统综述与综合框架
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1151-66. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
8
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.探究患者及公众参与对健康和社会照护研究的影响:一项系统综述
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
9
A model for developing outcome measures from the perspectives of mental health service users.从心理健康服务使用者的角度制定结果测量指标的模型。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011;23(1):41-6. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2010.545990.