Department of Psychology,Tufts University,Medford,MA 02155,USA.
Department of Psychology,Harvard University,Cambridge, MA 01238,USA.
Psychol Med. 2019 Jun;49(8):1335-1345. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001952. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
People with schizophrenia process language in unusual ways, but the causes of these abnormalities are unclear. In particular, it has proven difficult to empirically disentangle explanations based on impairments in the top-down processing of higher level information from those based on the bottom-up processing of lower level information.
To distinguish these accounts, we used visual-world eye tracking, a paradigm that measures spoken language processing during real-world interactions. Participants listened to and then acted out syntactically ambiguous spoken instructions (e.g. 'tickle the frog with the feather', which could either specify how to tickle a frog, or which frog to tickle). We contrasted how 24 people with schizophrenia and 24 demographically matched controls used two types of lower level information (prosody and lexical representations) and two types of higher level information (pragmatic and discourse-level representations) to resolve the ambiguous meanings of these instructions. Eye tracking allowed us to assess how participants arrived at their interpretation in real time, while recordings of participants' actions measured how they ultimately interpreted the instructions.
We found a striking dissociation in participants' eye movements: the two groups were similarly adept at using lower level information to immediately constrain their interpretations of the instructions, but only controls showed evidence of fast top-down use of higher level information. People with schizophrenia, nonetheless, did eventually reach the same interpretations as controls.
These data suggest that language abnormalities in schizophrenia partially result from a failure to use higher level information in a top-down fashion, to constrain the interpretation of language as it unfolds in real time.
精神分裂症患者以不同寻常的方式处理语言,但这些异常的原因尚不清楚。特别是,要从基于高层信息的自上而下处理的解释和基于底层信息的自下而上处理的解释中,经验性地区分这些解释一直具有挑战性。
为了区分这些解释,我们使用了视觉世界眼动追踪,这是一种在真实互动中测量口语处理的范式。参与者听取并模仿具有句法歧义的口语指令(例如“用羽毛挠青蛙”,这既可以指定如何挠青蛙,也可以指定要挠哪只青蛙)。我们对比了 24 名精神分裂症患者和 24 名在人口统计学上匹配的对照组如何使用两种类型的底层信息(韵律和词汇表示)和两种类型的高层信息(语用和语篇级表示)来解决这些指令的歧义意义。眼动追踪使我们能够实时评估参与者如何得出他们的解释,而参与者动作的录音则衡量他们最终如何解释指令。
我们发现参与者的眼动有一个惊人的分离:两组人在使用底层信息立即限制对指令的解释方面同样熟练,但只有对照组显示出快速使用高层信息的自上而下的证据。然而,精神分裂症患者最终确实达到了与对照组相同的解释。
这些数据表明,精神分裂症中的语言异常部分是由于无法以自上而下的方式使用高层信息来约束语言在实时展开时的解释。