Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;52(24):1557-1563. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099078. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
This review aims to analyse strength training-based sports injury prevention randomised controlled trials (RCT) and present best evidence recommendations for athletes and future research. A priori PROSPERO registration; CRD42015006970.
Systematic review, qualitative analysis and meta-analysis. Sorting of studies and quality assessments were performed by two independent authors. Qualitative analyses, relative risk (RR) estimate with robustness and strength of evidence tests, formal tests of publication bias and post-hoc meta-regression were performed.
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched to July 2017.
RCTs on strength training exercises as primary prevention of sports injuries.
Six studies analysed five different interventions with four distinct outcomes. 7738 participants aged 12-40 years were included and sustained 177 acute or overuse injuries. Studies were published in 2003-2016, five from Europe and one from Africa. Cluster-adjusted intention-to-treat analysis established RR 0.338 (0.238-0.480). The result was consistent across robustness tests and strength of evidence was high. A 10% increase in strength training volume reduced the risk of injury by more than four percentage points. Formal tests found no publication bias.
The included studies were generally well designed and executed, had high compliance rates, were safe, and attained consistently favourable results across four different acute and overuse injury outcomes despite considerable differences in populations and interventions. Increasing strength training volume and intensity were associated with sports injury risk reduction. Three characteristically different approaches to prevention mechanisms were identified and incorporated into contemporary strength training recommendations.
本综述旨在分析基于力量训练的运动损伤预防随机对照试验(RCT),并为运动员和未来研究提出最佳证据建议。事先 PROSPERO 注册;CRD42015006970。
系统评价、定性分析和荟萃分析。两名独立作者对研究进行分类和质量评估。进行定性分析、稳健性和证据强度测试的相对风险(RR)估计、正式的发表偏倚检验和事后荟萃回归。
截至 2017 年 7 月,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 SPORTDiscus。
作为运动损伤一级预防的力量训练练习的 RCT。
六项研究分析了五种不同的干预措施,有四个不同的结果。7738 名年龄在 12-40 岁的参与者发生了 177 次急性或过度使用损伤。研究发表于 2003-2016 年,其中五项来自欧洲,一项来自非洲。集群调整的意向治疗分析确立了 RR 0.338(0.238-0.480)。结果在稳健性测试中一致,证据强度很高。力量训练量增加 10%,受伤风险降低超过四个百分点。正式检验未发现发表偏倚。
纳入的研究设计和执行总体上较好,依从性高,安全性高,尽管在人群和干预措施方面存在很大差异,但在四个不同的急性和过度使用损伤结果中均取得了一致的有利结果。增加力量训练量和强度与运动损伤风险降低有关。确定并纳入了三种预防机制的特征性不同方法,纳入了当代力量训练建议。