Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Emerg Med J. 2018 Nov;35(11):701-703. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207735. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
Research in outpatient setting suggests that the presence of companions during a medical encounter can improve clinician-patient communication. It is not known if the presence of companions has a similar effect in the acutely stressful context of the ED. This study tested whether the presence of companions in the ED relate to stronger clinician-patient communication. We further explored effect modification by demographic factors (race/ethnicity, education and language) thought to compromise communication.
Participants were drawn from an observational cohort study of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=876) recruited from an urban academic medical centre between 2013 and 2016. Patient interviews occurred both in the ED and post-ED discharge; communication was assessed using the Interpersonal Processes of Care Survey with possible range of scores of 14-70. Companions were categorised as close others (ie, partner/spouse or child), non-close others (eg, neighbour) or no one.
Perceptions of clinician-patient communication were high (=57.1, =10.6;). There was no association between companions (close/non-close/no one) and clinician-patient communication, p=0.262. Demographic factors were unrelated to communication. There was a significant interaction between education and companions. Having a close other in the ED was associated with stronger clinician-patient communication only for patients with high school education or less, p=0.027.
Neither the presence of companions nor demographic factors were related to clinician-patient communication. The interaction effect suggesting that patients completing high school or less have the most to gain from the presence of close others warrants further exploration.
门诊环境中的研究表明,在医疗就诊时陪伴者的存在可以改善医患沟通。目前尚不清楚陪伴者在 ED 这种高度紧张的环境中是否具有类似的影响。本研究旨在检验 ED 中陪伴者的存在是否与更强的医患沟通相关。我们进一步探讨了被认为会影响沟通的人口统计学因素(种族/民族、教育和语言)的调节作用。
参与者来自于 2013 年至 2016 年间在城市学术医疗中心招募的疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(n=876)的观察性队列研究。患者访谈在 ED 和 ED 出院后进行;沟通使用人际护理过程调查进行评估,得分范围为 14-70。陪伴者分为亲密的人(即伴侣/配偶或孩子)、非亲密的人(如邻居)或无人陪伴。
医患沟通的感知度较高(=57.1,=10.6)。陪伴者(亲密/非亲密/无人)与医患沟通之间没有关联,p=0.262。人口统计学因素与沟通无关。教育和陪伴者之间存在显著的交互作用。在 ED 有亲密的人陪伴仅与接受过高中或以下教育的患者的医患沟通更强相关,p=0.027。
陪伴者的存在或人口统计学因素均与医患沟通无关。交互作用表明,完成高中或以下教育的患者从亲密他人的存在中获益最多,这值得进一步探讨。