• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性临床试验,旨在评估基于磁共振成像(MRI)的全髋关节置换术中患者特异性髋臼器械导向器的准确性。

A prospective clinical trial to assess the accuracy of an MRI-based patient-specific acetabular instrument guide in total hip arthroplasty.

作者信息

Inoue Daisuke, Kabata Tamon, Kimura Hiroaki, Tsuchiya Hiroyuki

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa Red Cross Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jan;29(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2279-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-018-2279-7
PMID:30132077
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to conduct a prospective clinical trial to investigate the accuracy of an MRI-based patient-specific acetabular instrument guide during THA.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective consecutive review of 14 hips in 14 patients who underwent primary THA with a posterolateral approach between September 2016 and February 2018. All preoperative planning and postoperative evaluations were completed on CT-based templating software. A pelvic MRI was taken to create a patient-specific surgical instrument guide. In order to assess the effect of increased experience on accuracy, we divided the cases into two groups according to when surgery was performed and investigated the absolute error in the acetabular component angle between preoperative planning and the postoperative state for each of the groups.

RESULTS

We did not experience postoperative complications such as implant early dislocation in any of the cases. The absolute errors of acetabular implant angle using the patient-specific instrument guide were 3.7° ± 2.2° inclination and 4.5° ± 3.9° anteversion. The absolute error of the initial group was 4.7° ± 2.1° inclination and 6.1° ± 4.0° anteversion; for the later group, it was 2.8° ± 1.8° inclination and 3.2° ± 2.9° anteversion. There was a significant difference in the absolute error of acetabular implant placement between the initial group and the later group.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe this study shows that MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation may be a useful alternative to surgical tracking during THA once the slight learning curve has been overcome.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是进行一项前瞻性临床试验,以调查在全髋关节置换术(THA)期间基于MRI的患者特异性髋臼器械导向器的准确性。

方法

我们对2016年9月至2018年2月期间采用后外侧入路接受初次THA的14例患者的14个髋关节进行了前瞻性连续回顾。所有术前规划和术后评估均在基于CT的模板软件上完成。进行骨盆MRI以创建患者特异性手术器械导向器。为了评估经验增加对准确性的影响,我们根据手术时间将病例分为两组,并调查每组术前规划与术后状态之间髋臼组件角度的绝对误差。

结果

我们在任何病例中均未遇到术后并发症,如植入物早期脱位。使用患者特异性器械导向器时髋臼植入角度的绝对误差为倾斜3.7°±2.2°,前倾角4.5°±3.9°。初始组的绝对误差为倾斜4.7°±2.1°,前倾角6.1°±4.0°;后期组为倾斜2.8°±1.8°,前倾角3.2°±2.9°。初始组和后期组之间髋臼植入物放置的绝对误差存在显著差异。

结论

我们认为本研究表明,一旦克服了轻微的学习曲线,基于MRI的患者特异性器械在THA期间可能是手术跟踪的一种有用替代方法。

相似文献

1
A prospective clinical trial to assess the accuracy of an MRI-based patient-specific acetabular instrument guide in total hip arthroplasty.一项前瞻性临床试验,旨在评估基于磁共振成像(MRI)的全髋关节置换术中患者特异性髋臼器械导向器的准确性。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jan;29(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2279-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
2
Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.改良 Watson-Jones 入路全髋关节置换术中仰卧位与侧卧位对髋臼杯准确定位的比较:一项随机单盲对照试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Accuracy and practicability of a patient-specific guide using acetabular superolateral rim during THA in Crowe II/III DDH patients: a retrospective study.髋臼上外侧缘患者特异性导板在Crowe II/III型发育性髋关节发育不良患者全髋关节置换术中的准确性和实用性:一项回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jan 14;14(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1029-1.
4
Accuracy of acetabular cup insertion in an anterolateral supine approach using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system.基于加速度计的便携式导航系统在前外侧仰卧位入路中髋臼杯置入的准确性。
J Artif Organs. 2021 Mar;24(1):82-89. doi: 10.1007/s10047-020-01206-8. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Preoperative planning for implant placement with consideration of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty: postoperative efficacy evaluation.全髋关节置换术中考虑骨盆倾斜的种植体植入术前规划:术后疗效评估
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 13;17:280. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1120-x.
6
Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.原发性骨关节炎全髋关节置换术中采用推荐的安全组件方向与固有解剖结构的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):e172. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01014.
7
Efficacy of a computed tomography-based navigation system for placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip.基于计算机断层扫描的导航系统在发育性髋关节发育不良全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体置入的疗效
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Sep-Dec;25(3):2309499017727954. doi: 10.1177/2309499017727954.
8
Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.全髋关节置换术后髋臼杯位置测量的准确性:放射学规划软件与三维计算机断层扫描的比较
Int Orthop. 2017 Apr;41(4):731-738. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3240-1. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?对于使用后外侧入路的右利手外科医生进行双侧全髋关节置换时,髋臼杯的方向是否存在差异?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 23;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0789-y.
10
Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls.能否定义一个比Lewinnek安全区更安全的目标区域来预防全髋关节置换术的不稳定?对56例髋关节置换术后脱位患者和93例匹配对照进行病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):657-661. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Early outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using point-of-care manufactured patient-specific instruments: a single university hospital's initial experience.使用即时制造的个体化患者专用手术器械行全髋关节置换术的早期结果:单家大学医院的初步经验。
BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02281-3.
2
Acetabular cup positioning in primary routine total hip arthroplasty-a review of current concepts and technologies.初次常规全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯的定位——当前概念与技术综述
Arthroplasty. 2023 Dec 1;5(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00213-3.
3
Feasibility and anteversion accuracy of a patient-specific instrument for femoral prosthesis implantation in total hip arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Intellijoint HIP: a 3D mini-optical navigation tool for improving intraoperative accuracy during total hip arthroplasty.Intellijoint HIP:一种用于提高全髋关节置换术中手术精度的3D微型光学导航工具。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2016 Nov 18;9:401-408. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S119161. eCollection 2016.
2
Patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty.个体化假体可提高全髋关节置换中髋臼假体安放的准确性。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct;98-B(10):1342-1346. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37808.
3
The current status and future prospects of computer-assisted hip surgery.
患者特异性股骨假体植入工具在全髋关节置换术中的可行性和前倾角准确性。
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Sep 13;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01152-5.
4
The accuracy and precision of acetabular implant measurements from CT imaging.基于CT成像的髋臼植入物测量的准确性和精确性。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Apr 28;11:1150061. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1150061. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient-specific total hip arthroplasty is superior to conventional methods for Crowe III and IV adult developmental hip dysplasia: a randomized controlled trial.针对成人Crowe III型和IV型发育性髋关节发育不良,定制型全髋关节置换术优于传统方法:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(3):212. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3488.
6
Validation of use of transverse acetabular ligament and mechanical angle guide device to orient the acetabular cup.髋臼横韧带及机械角度导向装置用于髋臼杯定向的验证
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11(Suppl 5):S766-S771. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.07.034. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
A Comparative Study of Patients' Subjective Feelings Toward Total Hip Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Instruments and Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty.患者对个体化截骨全髋关节置换术与传统全髋关节置换术的主观感受的对比研究。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):269-276. doi: 10.1111/os.12626.
8
A new method for intraoperative assessment of leg length, sizing and placement of the components in total hip replacement.一种新的方法,用于在全髋关节置换术中评估下肢长度、假体大小和位置。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):689-694. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02621-1. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
计算机辅助髋关节手术的现状与未来展望
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Mar;21(2):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.10.023. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
4
Value of computed tomography-based three-dimensional surgical preoperative planning software in total hip arthroplasty with developmental dysplasia of the hip.基于计算机断层扫描的三维手术术前规划软件在发育性髋关节发育不良全髋关节置换术中的价值
J Orthop Sci. 2015 Mar;20(2):340-6. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0683-3. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
5
Accuracy of an adjustable patient-specific guide for acetabular alignment in hip replacement surgery (Optihip).髋关节置换手术中用于髋臼对线的可调节患者特异性导向器(Optihip)的准确性。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014 Sep;228(9):876-89. doi: 10.1177/0954411914548469.
6
Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement.髋关节置换术中的骨盆位置和运动。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):876-83. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32107.
7
Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial.使用患者特异性器械与标准手术器械比较髋臼杯位置:一项随机临床试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):1030-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
8
Strict component positioning is necessary in hip resurfacing.在髋关节表面置换术中,严格的部件定位是必要的。
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Mar;18(2):290-7. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0351-4. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
9
Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA?基于 CT 的导航是否能提高陶瓷-陶瓷 THR 的长期生存率?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3054-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2378-4.
10
Does degree of the pelvic deformity affect the accuracy of computed tomography-based hip navigation?骨盆畸形程度是否影响基于 CT 的髋关节导航的准确性?
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Oct;27(9):1651-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 30.