Mulch G, Lewitzki W
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1977 Apr 27;215(2):135-45. doi: 10.1007/BF00455860.
We wanted to ascertain whether a physiological horizontal vestibular spontaneous nystagmus is existent, or whether the spontaneous and positional nystagmus seen in clinically healthy persons in the electronystagmogram -- when fixation had been excluded completely -- was always the result of earlier damages to the vestibular system (Jatho). For this purpose we tried to detect a spontaneous and positional nystagmus in 102 healthy persons from 6 age groups (17 each) between 11 and 70 years of age. When the ENG was registered with open eyes in darkness, 63 out of the 102 test persons had a horizontal spontaneous or positional nystagmus, however, under the Frenzel glasses there was a nystagmus in only 2 out of these test persons. With open eyes in darkness, the frequency and intensity was the same in all age groups. With this, we believe to have proved that a physiological horizontal vestibular nystagmus does exist. We share Kornhuber's opinion that the examination with the Frenzel glasses in a dark room, together with the head shaking test and positional test, at the present time represents the best method for differentiating between physiological and pathological spontaneous nystagmus.
我们想要确定是否存在生理性水平前庭自发性眼球震颤,或者在排除完全固定的情况下,在眼震电图中临床健康个体所见到的自发性和位置性眼球震颤是否始终是前庭系统早期损伤的结果(雅托)。为此,我们试图在102名年龄在11岁至70岁之间的6个年龄组(每组17人)的健康个体中检测自发性和位置性眼球震颤。当在黑暗中睁眼记录眼震电图时,102名测试对象中有63人出现水平自发性或位置性眼球震颤,然而,在使用弗伦泽尔眼镜的情况下,这些测试对象中只有2人出现眼球震颤。在黑暗中睁眼时,所有年龄组的频率和强度相同。据此,我们认为已证明生理性水平前庭眼球震颤确实存在。我们赞同科尔恩胡伯的观点,即在暗室中使用弗伦泽尔眼镜进行检查,连同摇头试验和位置试验,目前是区分生理性和病理性自发性眼球震颤的最佳方法。