• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《BackTrack:一种基于社区的多组分干预措施对澳大利亚农村地区高危年轻人的成本效益分析》。

A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting.

机构信息

Health Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 18;19(16):10273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610273.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191610273
PMID:36011908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9408498/
Abstract

BackTrack is a multi-component, community-based program designed to build capacity amongst high-risk young people. The aim of this study was to conduct a benefit-cost analysis of BackTrack, which was implemented in Armidale, a rural town in New South Wales, Australia. Costs and benefits were identified, measured and valued in 2016 Australian dollars. Costs were estimated from program financial and administrative records. Benefits were estimated using a pre-post design and conservative economic assumptions. Benefits included education attendance or completion; employment; engagement with health service providers; reduced homelessness; economic productivity; reduced vandalism to local infrastructure; reduced youth crime; reduced engagement with the justice system; and program income generated by participants. The counterfactual baseline was zero educational outcome, based on discussions with BackTrack staff and expert informants. We tested this assumption compared to the assumption that participants had a Year 8 education. There was evidence of significant quantifiable improvements in several outcomes: high school attendance or completion, vocational education attendance or completion, unskilled or vocationally qualified employment and economic productivity. Reduced homelessness, engagement with health services and acquisition of job readiness skills, as well as reduced local infrastructure vandalism and reduced crime were further quantifiable improvements. The net social benefit of BackTrack was estimated at $3,267,967 with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.03, meaning that every dollar invested in BackTrack would return $2.03 in benefits. BackTrack represents a viable funding option for a government interested in addressing the needs of high-risk young people.

摘要

BackTrack 是一个多组件、基于社区的项目,旨在培养高风险年轻人的能力。本研究旨在对 BackTrack 进行效益成本分析,该项目在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的一个农村城镇阿米代尔实施。2016 年澳元对成本和效益进行了识别、衡量和评估。成本是根据项目财务和行政记录估算的。效益是使用前后设计和保守的经济假设来估算的。效益包括教育出勤率或完成率;就业;与卫生服务提供者的接触;减少无家可归;经济生产力;减少对当地基础设施的破坏;减少青少年犯罪;减少与司法系统的接触;以及参与者产生的项目收入。反事实基线是零教育成果,这是基于与 BackTrack 工作人员和专家信息提供者的讨论。我们测试了这个假设,即参与者接受了 8 年级教育,与这个假设进行了比较。有证据表明,在几个结果方面有显著的可量化的改善:高中出勤率或完成率、职业教育出勤率或完成率、非熟练或职业资格就业和经济生产力。减少无家可归、与卫生服务的接触和获得工作准备技能,以及减少对当地基础设施的破坏和减少犯罪,这些方面都有进一步的可量化的改善。BackTrack 的净社会效益估计为 3267967 美元,效益成本比为 2.03,这意味着每投资 1 美元在 BackTrack 上,就会获得 2.03 美元的收益。BackTrack 是政府为满足高风险年轻人的需求而选择的一种可行的资金来源。

相似文献

1
A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting.《BackTrack:一种基于社区的多组分干预措施对澳大利亚农村地区高危年轻人的成本效益分析》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 18;19(16):10273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610273.
2
Exploring Community-Based Options for Reducing Youth Crime.探索减少青少年犯罪的社区方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105097.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
5
Cost-benefit study of school nursing services.学校护理服务的成本效益研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jul;168(7):642-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5441.
6
Applying Strengths Model principles to build a rural community-based mental health support service and achieve recovery outcomes.应用优势模型原则建立基于农村社区的心理健康支持服务并实现康复成果。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Feb;18(1):3708. doi: 10.22605/RRH3708. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
INdividual Vocational and Educational Support Trial (INVEST) for young people with borderline personality disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.个体职业和教育支持试验(INVEST)用于边缘型人格障碍的年轻人:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04471-3.
8
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Interactions with youth justice and associated costs for young people with speech, language and communication needs.言语、语言和沟通需求的青年与少年司法及其相关费用的相互作用。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jul;56(4):797-811. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12628. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
Economic evaluation of a multi-strategy intervention that improves school-based physical activity policy implementation.多策略干预措施改善基于学校的身体活动政策实施的经济评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jun 28;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01215-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Community-Based Options for Reducing Youth Crime.探索减少青少年犯罪的社区方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 12;18(10):5097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105097.
2
Costing alcohol-related assault in the night-time economy from a societal perspective: The case of Central Sydney.从社会视角看夜间经济中与酒精相关的攻击行为成本:以悉尼市中心为例。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Jul;40(5):779-799. doi: 10.1111/dar.13242. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
3
Systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people.针对高危青少年干预措施的经济评估系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3450-x.
4
Improving the evidence base for services working with youth at-risk of involvement in the criminal justice system: developing a standardised program approach.改善针对有卷入刑事司法系统风险的青年的服务的证据基础:制定标准化项目方法。
Health Justice. 2018 Apr 16;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0066-5.
5
The Cost of Youth Suicide in Australia.澳大利亚青少年自杀的代价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;15(4):672. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040672.
6
A review of the economic impact of mental illness.精神疾病的经济影响综述。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Feb;43(1):43-48. doi: 10.1071/AH16115.
7
The Feasibility of Embedding Data Collection into the Routine Service Delivery of a Multi-Component Program for High-Risk Young People.将数据收集嵌入针对高危青少年的多组件项目常规服务提供中的可行性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 20;14(2):208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020208.
8
The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.定性研究方法在离散选择实验中的作用
Med Decis Making. 2017 Apr;37(3):298-313. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16683934. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
The quality and effectiveness of interventions that target multiple risk factors among young people: a systematic review.针对年轻人多种风险因素的干预措施的质量和效果:一项系统综述。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Feb;41(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12573. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
10
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 May;31(5):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0032-y.