Dandel Michael
German Centre for Heart and Circulatory Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, 10785 Berlin, Germany.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 1;25(8):272. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508272. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Ventricular pump function, which is determined by myocyte contractility, preload and afterload, and, additionally, also significantly influenced by heart rhythm, synchrony of intraventricular contraction and ventricular interdependence, explains the difficulties in establishing the contribution of myocardial contractile dysfunction to the development and progression of heart failure. Estimating myocardial contractility is one of the most difficult challenges because the most commonly used clinical measurements of cardiac performance cannot differentiate contractility changes from alterations in ventricular loading conditions. Under both physiological and pathological conditions, there is also a permanent complex interaction between myocardial contractility, ventricular anatomy and hemodynamic loading conditions. All this explains why no single parameter can alone reveal the real picture of ventricular dysfunction. Over time there has been increasing recognition that a load-independent contractility parameter cannot truly exist, because loading itself changes the myofilament force-generating capacity. Because the use of a single parameter is inadequate, it is necessary to perform multiparametric evaluations and also apply integrative approaches using parameter combinations which include details about ventricular loading conditions. This is particularly important for evaluating the highly afterload-sensitive right ventricular function. In this regard, the existence of certain reluctance particularly to the implementation of non-invasively obtainable parameter combinations in the routine clinical praxis should be reconsidered in the future. Among the non-invasive approaches used to evaluate ventricular function in connection with its current loading conditions, assessment of the relationship between ventricular contraction (e.g., myocardial displacement or deformation) and pressure overload, or the relationship between ejection volume (or ejection velocity) and pressure overload, as well as the relationship between ventricular dilation and pressure overload, were found useful for therapeutic decision-making. In the future, it will be unavoidable to take the load dependency of ventricular function much more into consideration. A solid basis for achieving this goal will be obtainable by intensifying the clinical research necessary to provide more evidence for the practical importance of this largely unsolved problem.
心室泵功能由心肌收缩力、前负荷和后负荷决定,此外,还受到心律、心室内收缩同步性和心室相互依存性的显著影响,这解释了为何难以确定心肌收缩功能障碍在心力衰竭发生和发展过程中的作用。评估心肌收缩力是最具挑战性的任务之一,因为最常用的心脏功能临床测量方法无法区分收缩力变化与心室负荷条件的改变。在生理和病理条件下,心肌收缩力、心室解剖结构和血流动力学负荷条件之间也存在着持续复杂的相互作用。所有这些都解释了为什么没有一个单一参数能够单独揭示心室功能障碍的真实情况。随着时间的推移,人们越来越认识到,与负荷无关的收缩力参数实际上并不存在,因为负荷本身会改变肌丝产生力的能力。由于使用单一参数是不够的,因此有必要进行多参数评估,并采用综合方法,使用包括心室负荷条件细节的参数组合。这对于评估对后负荷高度敏感的右心室功能尤为重要。在这方面,未来应重新考虑在常规临床实践中对采用非侵入性可获得的参数组合存在的某些抵触情绪。在用于评估与当前负荷条件相关的心室功能的非侵入性方法中,评估心室收缩(如心肌位移或变形)与压力过载之间的关系、射血容积(或射血速度)与压力过载之间的关系以及心室扩张与压力过载之间的关系,被发现对治疗决策有用。未来,不可避免地要更多地考虑心室功能的负荷依赖性。通过加强临床研究,为这个在很大程度上尚未解决的问题的实际重要性提供更多证据,将为实现这一目标奠定坚实基础。