• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估初级保健自动清洗消毒器中使用的清洁剂的功效和成本。

Assessing the efficacy and cost of detergents used in a primary care automated washer disinfector.

机构信息

College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2018 Aug 24;225(4):315-319. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.643.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.643
PMID:30141495
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cleaning of re-usable medical devices is a critical control point in the decontamination cycle, although defined end-points of the process are controversial.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate cleaning efficacy and cost of different detergent classes in an automated washer disinfector (AWD) designed for dental practice.

METHODS

Loads comprised test soiled dental hand instruments in cassettes and extraction forceps. Residual protein assayed using the International standard method (ISO 15883-5:2005) 1% SDS elution with ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) or GBox technology (on instrument OPA analysis). Short (60 minutes) and long (97 minutes) AWD cycles were used with four different classes of detergents, tap water and reverse osmosis water.

RESULTS

SDS elution analysis (N = 612 instruments) demonstrated four detergents with both wash cycles achieved equivalent cleanliness levels and below a threshold of 200 μg protein/instrument. GBox methodology (N = 575) using UK Department of Health threshold of 5 μg/instrument side demonstrated that tap water performed with the greatest efficacy for all types of instruments and cycle types.

CONCLUSIONS

Using International standard methodology, different detergent classes had equivalence in cleaning efficacy. Cheaper detergents used in this study performed with similar efficacy to more expensive solutions. Findings emphasise the importance of validating the detergent (type and concentration) for each AWD.

摘要

背景

可重复使用医疗器械的清洗是消毒循环中的一个关键控制点,尽管该过程的定义终点存在争议。

目的

研究自动清洗消毒器(AWD)中不同洗涤剂类别的清洗效果和成本,该 AWD 专为牙科实践而设计。

方法

将装有测试污染牙科手动器械和拔牙钳的盒式载物架装入负载。使用国际标准方法(ISO 15883-5:2005),用邻苯二甲醛(OPA)或 GBox 技术(器械 OPA 分析)洗脱 1% SDS 后测定残留蛋白。使用两种不同的 AWD 循环(60 分钟和 97 分钟)和四种不同类型的清洁剂、自来水和反渗透水。

结果

SDS 洗脱分析(N = 612 个器械)显示,两种清洗循环中使用的四种清洁剂均达到了相同的清洁水平,且低于 200 μg 蛋白/器械的阈值。使用英国卫生部 5 μg/器械的阈值,使用 GBox 方法(N = 575),对所有类型器械和循环类型的测试结果表明,自来水在所有器械和循环类型中均具有最高的清洁效果。

结论

使用国际标准方法,不同的清洁剂类别的清洁效果具有等效性。在本研究中使用的较便宜的清洁剂与更昂贵的解决方案具有相似的效果。研究结果强调了为每个 AWD 验证清洁剂(类型和浓度)的重要性。

相似文献

1
Assessing the efficacy and cost of detergents used in a primary care automated washer disinfector.评估初级保健自动清洗消毒器中使用的清洁剂的功效和成本。
Br Dent J. 2018 Aug 24;225(4):315-319. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.643.
2
A quantitative assessment of residual protein levels on dental instruments reprocessed by manual, ultrasonic and automated cleaning methods.定量评估手动、超声和自动清洗方法再处理的牙科器械上的残留蛋白水平。
Br Dent J. 2011 May 14;210(9):E14. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.144.
3
An investigation of the decontamination of Siqveland matrix bands.西克维兰德基质带去污的调查。
Br Dent J. 2007 Feb 24;202(4):E12; discussion 220-1. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.142. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
4
Influence of usage history, instrument complexity, and different cleaning procedures on the cleanliness of blood-contaminated dental surgical instruments.使用历史、器械复杂性及不同清洁程序对血液污染牙科手术器械清洁度的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;30(7):702-4. doi: 10.1086/598241.
5
Reducing the risk of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by improving the cleaning of neurosurgical instruments.通过改进神经外科器械的清洗来降低医源性克雅氏病的风险。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Nov;100(3):e70-e76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
6
Comparison of washer-disinfector cleaning indicators: impact of temperature and cleaning cycle parameters.清洗消毒器清洗指标的比较:温度和清洗周期参数的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Feb;42(2):e23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.10.005.
7
Cleaning endodontic files in a washer disinfector.在清洗消毒器中清洁根管锉
Br Dent J. 2008 May 24;204(10):E17; discussion 562-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.411. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
Effective cleaning and decontamination of the internal air and water channels, heads and head-gears of multiple contra-angle dental handpieces using an enzymatic detergent and automated washer-disinfection in a dental hospital setting.在牙科医院环境中,使用酶清洁剂和自动化清洗消毒器对多个高速手机的内部气路和水路、机头和机头等部件进行有效清洁和消毒。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Oct;128:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
9
Thermostable adenylate kinase technology: a new process indicator and its use as a validation tool for the reprocessing of surgical instruments.热稳定腺嘌呤激酶技术:一种新的过程指标及其在手术器械再处理验证中的应用。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Feb;74(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
10
In vitro evaluation of cleaning efficacy of detergents recommended for use on dental instruments.体外评估推荐用于牙科器械的清洁剂的清洁效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Nov;40(9):e255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Ultrasonic Cleaning Products With Various Disinfection Chemistries on Dental Instruments Contaminated With Bioburden.具有不同消毒化学组成的超声清洁产品对被生物负载污染的牙科器械的功效。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun;75(3):1632-1639. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.009. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
[Hygiene requirements for the reprocessing of medical devices. Recommendation of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)].[医疗器械再处理的卫生要求。罗伯特·科赫研究所(RKI)医院卫生与感染预防委员会(KRINKO)及联邦药品和医疗器械研究所(BfArM)的建议]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Oct;55(10):1244-310. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1548-6.
2
In vitro evaluation of cleaning efficacy of detergents recommended for use on dental instruments.体外评估推荐用于牙科器械的清洁剂的清洁效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Nov;40(9):e255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
3
Availability of manufacturers' information on efficacy and compatibility of detergents used for cleaning dental instruments.医疗器械清洁剂的功效和兼容性制造商信息的可获得性。
Br Dent J. 2012 May 25;212(10):E16. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.419.
4
A quantitative assessment of residual protein levels on dental instruments reprocessed by manual, ultrasonic and automated cleaning methods.定量评估手动、超声和自动清洗方法再处理的牙科器械上的残留蛋白水平。
Br Dent J. 2011 May 14;210(9):E14. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.144.
5
Quantitative measurement of the efficacy of protein removal by cleaning formulations; comparative evaluation of prion-directed cleaning chemistries.定量测量清洗配方去除蛋白质的效果;朊病毒导向清洗化学物质的比较评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Feb;74(2):144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
6
Pre-sterilisation cleaning of re-usable instruments in general dental practice.一般牙科诊所中可重复使用器械的灭菌前清洁。
Br Dent J. 2007 May 12;202(9):E22; discussion 550-1. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.124. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
7
Different experimental protocols for decontamination affect the cleaning of medical devices. A preliminary electron microscopy analysis.不同的去污实验方案会影响医疗器械的清洁效果。一项初步电子显微镜分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Apr;65(4):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 Jan 22.