Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Calle Ramón y Cajal s/n, Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Calle Ramón y Cajal s/n, Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
The kinematics of the lumbar region and the activation patterns of the erector spinae muscle have been associated with the genesis of low back pain, which is one of the most common complications associated with pregnancy. Despite the high prevalence of pregnancy-related low back pain, the biomechanical adaptations of the lumbar region during pregnancy remain unknown.
This study analyzes lumbar spine motion and the activation pattern of the lumbar erector spinae muscle in healthy pregnant women.
A case-control study.
The study involved 34 nulliparous women (control group) and 34 pregnant women in the third trimester (week 36 ± 1).
We recorded the parameters of angular displacement of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane during trunk flexion-extension, and the EMG activity of the erector spinae muscles during flexion, extension, eccentric and concentric contractions, and the myolectrical silence.
The participants performed several series of trunk flexion-extension movements, which were repeated 2 months postpartum. The position of the lumbar spine was recorded using an electromagnetic motion capture system. EMG activity was recorded by a surface EMG system and expressed as a percentage of a submaximal reference contraction.
Antepartum measurements showed a decrease (relative to control and postpartum measurements) in lumbar maximum flexion (52.5 ± 10.5° vs 57.3 ± 7.7° and 58.7 ± 8.6°; p < .01), the percentage of lumbar flexion during forward bending (56.4 ± 5.6% vs 59.4 ± 6.8% and 59.7 ± 5.6%; p < .01), and the time keeping maximum levels of lumbar flexion (35.7 ± 6.7% vs 43.8 ± 5.3% and 50.1 ± 3.7%; p < .01). Higher levels of erector spinae activation were observed in pregnant women during forward bending (10.1 ± 4.8% vs 6.3 ± 2.4% and 6.6 ± 2.7%; p < .01) and eccentric contraction (12.1 ± 5.2% vs 9.4 ± 3.1% and 9.1 ± 2.9%; p < .01), as well as a shortened erector spinae myoelectric silence during flexion.
Pregnant women show adaptations in their patterns of lumbar motion and erector spinae activity during trunk flexion-extension. These changes could be associated with the genesis of pregnancy-related low back pain, by means of biomechanical protection mechanisms against the increase on abdominal mass and ligamentous laxity.
腰椎的运动学和竖脊肌的激活模式与腰痛的发生有关,腰痛是与妊娠最相关的常见并发症之一。尽管妊娠相关性腰痛的发病率很高,但妊娠期间腰椎的生物力学适应性仍不清楚。
本研究分析了健康孕妇的腰椎运动和竖脊肌的激活模式。
病例对照研究。
研究纳入了 34 名未生育的女性(对照组)和 34 名妊娠 36 周(±1 周)的孕妇。
我们记录了腰椎在矢状面屈伸运动时的角度位移参数,以及在屈、伸、离心和向心收缩时竖脊肌的肌电图活动,以及肌电静默。
参与者进行了几组腰椎屈伸运动,2 个月后在产后再次进行。腰椎的位置通过电磁运动捕捉系统记录。肌电图活动通过表面肌电图系统记录,并表示为亚最大参考收缩的百分比。
产前测量显示,腰椎最大前屈度(相对于对照组和产后测量值)下降(52.5 ± 10.5°比 57.3 ± 7.7°和 58.7 ± 8.6°;p<.01),前屈时腰椎前屈度的百分比(56.4 ± 5.6%比 59.4 ± 6.8%和 59.7 ± 5.6%;p<.01),以及保持最大腰椎前屈度的时间(35.7 ± 6.7%比 43.8 ± 5.3%和 50.1 ± 3.7%;p<.01)。在向前弯曲时,孕妇的竖脊肌激活水平更高(10.1 ± 4.8%比 6.3 ± 2.4%和 6.6 ± 2.7%;p<.01)和离心收缩(12.1 ± 5.2%比 9.4 ± 3.1%和 9.1 ± 2.9%;p<.01),以及在屈肌时竖脊肌的肌电静默缩短。
孕妇在腰椎屈伸运动时表现出腰椎运动和竖脊肌活动模式的适应性变化。这些变化可能与妊娠相关性腰痛的发生有关,通过对腹部重量增加和韧带松弛的生物力学保护机制来实现。