Suppr超能文献

跟腱断裂修复术后三种皮肤缝合方法的比较。

A comparison of three methods of skin closure following repair of Achilles tendon rupture.

作者信息

Park Young Hwan, Chang An Seong, Choi Gi Won, Kim Hak Jun

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan, 15355, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Injury. 2018 Oct;49(10):1942-1946. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

Abstract

Meticulous skin closure is required to avoid wound problems after Achilles tendon surgery. The purpose of our study was to compare postoperative complication rate, operation time, clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the wound among two topical skin adhesives (2-octyl cyanoacrylate and n-butyl cyanoacrylate) and conventional nylon skin sutures in Achilles tendon repair surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the records 122 consecutive patients (40 patient in nylon skin suture, 43 patients in 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and 39 patients in n-butyl cyanoacrylate) who underwent surgical repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture between 2012 and 2016. The primary outcome measure was the development of complications in the wound. Secondary outcome measures included the operative time, the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and patient satisfaction with the wound. There was no difference in complication rate in the wound (p = 0.694) and in ATRS (p = 0.824) among patients in the three groups. Mean operative time in nylon skin suture group was significantly longer than in the 2-octyl cyanoacrylate group and n-butyl cyanoacrylate group (p = 0.018 and p = 0.002, respectively). Patient satisfaction in the 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and n-butyl cyanoacrylate groups was significantly higher than in the nylon skin suture group (p = 0.015 and 0.018, respectively). The use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and n-butyl cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives for skin closure following repair of Achilles tendon rupture has equivalent effectiveness and safety compared to conventional nylon skin suture, but higher patient satisfaction. Despite its higher cost, these topical skin adhesives are viable alternatives for wound closure in patients who regard cosmetic outcomes as important.

摘要

跟腱手术后需要精细的皮肤缝合以避免伤口问题。我们研究的目的是比较两种外用皮肤粘合剂(2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和正丁基氰基丙烯酸酯)与传统尼龙皮肤缝线在跟腱修复手术中的术后并发症发生率、手术时间、临床结果及患者对伤口的满意度。我们回顾性分析了2012年至2016年间连续122例行急性跟腱断裂手术修复患者的记录(40例使用尼龙皮肤缝线,43例使用2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯,39例使用正丁基氰基丙烯酸酯)。主要观察指标是伤口并发症的发生情况。次要观察指标包括手术时间、跟腱完全断裂评分(ATRS)及患者对伤口的满意度。三组患者的伤口并发症发生率(p = 0.694)和ATRS(p = 0.824)无差异。尼龙皮肤缝线组的平均手术时间显著长于2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯组和正丁基氰基丙烯酸酯组(分别为p = 0.018和p = 0.002)。2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯组和正丁基氰基丙烯酸酯组患者的满意度显著高于尼龙皮肤缝线组(分别为p = 0.015和0.018)。跟腱断裂修复后使用2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和正丁基氰基丙烯酸酯外用皮肤粘合剂进行皮肤缝合与传统尼龙皮肤缝线相比,有效性和安全性相当,但患者满意度更高。尽管成本较高,但对于重视美容效果的患者,这些外用皮肤粘合剂是伤口闭合的可行替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验