Suppr超能文献

辅助诊断以鉴别短暂性意识丧失患者的诊断标准:系统评价。

Diagnostic criteria to aid the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with transient loss of consciousness: A systematic review.

机构信息

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom; Department of Academic Neurology, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, United Kingdom.

The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham Hospital, Moorgate Road, Rotherham S60 2UD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Seizure. 2018 Oct;61:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) is a common presentation in primary care. Over 90% of these are due to epileptic seizures (ES), syncope, or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Misdiagnosis rates are as high as 30%.

METHODS

Systematic review of inter-ictal clinical criteria to aid differential diagnosis of TLOC. We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases, as well as relevant grey literature depositories and citations of relevant reviews and guidelines for studies giving sensitivity and specificity of inter-ictal clinical characteristics used to differentiate between causes of TLOC. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion and performed critical appraisal of included articles. We performed a narrative synthesis of included studies.

RESULTS

Of 1023 results, 16 papers were included. Two compared syncope, ES, and PNES; all others compared ES and PNES. All were at significant risk of bias in at least one domain. 6 studied patient symptoms, 6 medical and social history, 3 witness reports and 1 examination findings. No individual criterion differentiated between diagnoses with high sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of validated diagnostic criteria to help clinicians assessing patients in primary or emergency care settings to discriminate between common causes of TLOC. Performance may be improved by combining sets of criteria in a clinical decision rule, but no such rule has been validated prospectively against gold-standard diagnostic criteria.

摘要

背景

短暂性意识丧失(TLOC)是初级保健中的常见表现。这些表现中超过 90%是由于癫痫发作(ES)、晕厥或心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)引起的。误诊率高达 30%。

方法

对 TLOC 鉴别诊断的间歇期临床标准进行系统评价。我们检索了 Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 PsycInfo 数据库,以及相关灰色文献库和相关综述及指南的参考文献,以寻找用于区分 TLOC 病因的间歇期临床特征的敏感性和特异性的研究。两名独立审查员选择纳入的研究,并对纳入的文章进行批判性评估。我们对纳入的研究进行了叙述性综合。

结果

在 1023 项结果中,有 16 篇论文被纳入。其中 2 篇比较了晕厥、ES 和 PNES;其余均比较了 ES 和 PNES。所有研究在至少一个领域都存在显著的偏倚风险。其中 6 项研究了患者症状,6 项研究了医疗和社会史,3 项研究了目击者报告,1 项研究了检查结果。没有任何单一标准能以高敏感性和特异性区分诊断。

结论

目前缺乏经过验证的诊断标准来帮助临床医生在初级或急诊保健环境中评估患者,以区分 TLOC 的常见病因。通过将一组标准组合成一个临床决策规则,可能会提高性能,但还没有这样的规则针对黄金标准诊断标准进行前瞻性验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验