Satchell Liam, Morris Paul, Akehurst Lucy, Morrison Ed
1Centre for Situated Action and Communication, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry 1 Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY UK.
2International Centre for Research in Forensic Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry 1 Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY UK.
Curr Psychol. 2018;37(3):661-667. doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9557-5. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
When in a vulnerable situation (such as walking alone at night), an approaching person may be seen as 'threatening'. Here, we are interested in how well participants' judgments of threat reflected the trait aggression of approaching target people. We use two similar experiments to demonstrate and replicate the relationship between judgments of threat and target aggression. In both studies participants judged how threatening they found 22 approaching people (presented in videos). In Study One, participants judged the targets whilst sitting at a computer. In Study Two, participants were standing and were either oriented facing the videos, or oriented away from the videos so they had to look over their shoulder. This was to emulate a potentially threatening person approaching from behind. Across both studies, there was strong evidence that the average judgments of the threat posed by the approaching targets accurately reflected the targets' trait aggression. It was also found that there was noteworthy variability in individual participants' ability to detect aggression, with a few participants even having an inverse relationship between threat and the target's aggression. This research demonstrates that judgments of how 'threatening' a person is can be used to accurately index trait aggression at a distance.
当处于易受伤害的情境中(比如夜间独自行走)时,接近的人可能会被视为“具有威胁性”。在此,我们感兴趣的是参与者对威胁的判断在多大程度上反映了接近目标人物的特质攻击性。我们通过两个相似的实验来证明和复制威胁判断与目标攻击性之间的关系。在这两项研究中,参与者都要判断他们觉得22个接近的人(以视频形式呈现)有多大威胁性。在研究一中,参与者坐在电脑前对目标进行判断。在研究二中,参与者站着,要么面向视频,要么背向视频,这样他们就得扭头看。这是为了模拟一个潜在威胁人物从背后接近的情景。在这两项研究中,都有强有力的证据表明,对接近目标所构成威胁的平均判断准确反映了目标的特质攻击性。研究还发现,个体参与者检测攻击性的能力存在显著差异,少数参与者甚至在威胁与目标攻击性之间呈现出负相关关系。这项研究表明,对一个人“具有多大威胁性”的判断可以用来准确地远距离衡量特质攻击性。